Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013219
Original file (20080013219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 DECEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013219 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 17 March 1972, Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) to show the military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police). 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that Item 23b (Related Civilian Occupation and D.O.T. Number) shows 620.281 and this was never true.  He also states that his record of assignments show he served in MOS 95B.  Further, he states that he is applying for disability compensation and he needs his MOS corrected.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his application a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), page 3; and his release from active duty (REFRAD) orders.

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

Counsel provided no request or statement and submitted no additional documentation on behalf of the applicant's request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of 

Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 16 June 1969, for 3 years.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and upon completion of the required training he was awarded primary MOS 62A, Engineer Equipment Assistant, on 2 December 1969.  The applicant was later awarded secondary MOS 63A, Mechanic Helper, on 13 October 1970.  The applicant's MOS was later changed to 63B upon his promotion to E-4 on 18 May 1971.  He was awarded MOS 62B as his secondary MOS on 18 May 1971.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20, Record of Assignments, shows he served in MOS 11B (Honor Guard) from 19 March to 12 May 1970 and in MOS 95B from 28 August 1971 to 10 March 1972.

4.  The applicant submitted a copy of his REFRAD Special Orders Number 77, dated 17 March 1972, that lists his MOS as 95B.  

5.  The applicant was REFRAD, in pay grade E-4, on 17 March 1972, as an overseas returnee.  He was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  His DD Form 214, Item 23a shows the MOS 62B.  Item 23a also shows the applicant was awarded MOS 62B on 18 May 1971.  Item 23b shows the civilian occupation code of 620.281. 

6.  Army Regulation 635-5, in effect, at the time, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous service.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  Item 23a would list the Soldier's primary MOS code number and title. If the specialty represented by the MOS had a related civilian occupation, Item 23b would list the appropriate job title and code number from the dictionary of occupational titles (D.O.T.).  If not applicable, "N/A" would be entered in Item 23b.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that Item 23a of his DD Form 214, should reflect the MOS 95B.  The evidence of record shows the applicant served in MOS 95B during his period of active duty; however, there is insufficient evidence to show he was ever awarded the MOS as his primary or as his secondary MOS. Neither the evidence submitted with the application nor the evidence of record supports his request nor does it establish that Item 23a of his DD Form 214 should reflect MOS 95B.  The applicant is therefore not entitled to a correction of Item 23a of his DD Form 214.  It is noted that Item 23a erroneously does not reflect his primary MOS of 63B2.

2.  The applicant's REFRAD orders show his MOS as 95B in the standard name line.  However, this appears to be an administrative error based on the applicant serving in that MOS at the time the orders were processed.  In view of the preponderance of the evidence, those orders are an insufficient basis for changing Item 23a to read the same.  

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013219



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013219


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010893

    Original file (20110010893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command), item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), item 23a (Specialty Number and Title), item 23b (Related Civilian Occupation and D.O.T. code related to his SMOS; and item 25 should document 71C MOS training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018476

    Original file (20080018476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the RVN from 4 August 1970 through 15 March 1972. The applicant's record contains no orders awarding him either the BSM or the PH, and neither of these awards is included in the list of earned awards contained in Item 41 of his DA Form 20 or Item 24 of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000588

    Original file (20080000588.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant essentially states that item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of his DD Form 214 correctly shows that his PMOS was 55B (Ammunition Storage Specialist). The fact that the applicant believes that the entry in item 23b should show his PMOS title was noted; however, the preparation of this item was in accordance with regulations in effect at the time, and this block is merely a way to translate his PMOS title into the title and D.O.T. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005014

    Original file (20110005014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Number) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 11D (Armor Reconnaissance Specialist). Army Regulation 635-5 states that items 23a and 23b will document the codes and titles of the separating Soldiers PMOS. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's PMOS was 71B, not 11D; therefore, his DD Form 214 is correct as stated and there is an insufficient basis to grant relief in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067569C070402

    Original file (2002067569C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does reflect that he was awarded a secondary specialty of 71B (clerk typist) in April 1967 but there are no orders in available records that confirm the award and no evidence the applicant ever performed duties in that specialty. Item 23a (specialty number & title) reflects an entry of 71B20/Clerk Typist. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023534

    Original file (20110023534.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was honorably released from active duty to the control of the ARNG on 9 December 1969. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the correct specialty number and title. edition in effect at the time, both specialties 63B and 63H had an equivalent civilian occupation title of "Automobile Mechanic."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005410

    Original file (20090005410.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title), to show the military occupational specialty (MOS) 12A, Pioneer. Item 23a of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the MOS 52F, Electrician. Neither the evidence submitted with the application nor the evidence of record supports his request nor does it establish that Item 23a of his DD Form 214 should reflect MOS 12A.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004770C071029

    Original file (20070004770C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and, in effect, also that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be amended to show he held primary military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). The War Department received requests to award the CIB to non-infantry individuals and units employed as infantry during tactical emergencies. It is acknowledged that the applicant was awarded primary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021970

    Original file (20110021970.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and his military occupational specialty (MOS) of 16D2O (Hawk Missile Crewman). While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016609

    Original file (20140016609.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This was reflected in item 23b of the DD Form 214. With respect to increasing his VA rating, the ABCMR corrects military records and even when it does so, the Board does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits. __________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.