Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006799
Original file (20090006799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	15 September 2009  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090006799 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for shrapnel wounds he received on 4 July 1969.  

2.  The applicant states he received a Bronze Star Medal for actions on 4 July 1969.  He contends he was wounded by shrapnel in his left arm in this incident and was treated by a medic.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of general orders, dated 10 September 1969, in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 September 1967 for a period of three years.  At the completion of basic combat training and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 67N (UH-1 helicopter repairman).  His highest grade attained was specialist five, E-5.  

3.  The applicant served in Vietnam from 4 September 1968 to 29 August 1969.

4.  Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile), General Orders Number 11878, dated 10 September 1969, show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (First Oak Leaf Cluster) for actions on 4 July 1969. These orders state, in part, "Specialist M_____ was serving as a door gunner on an OH-6A helicopter when the aircraft's sister ship crashed because of enemy fire.  The pilot of his ship immediately landed in a stream bed near the crash site.  With complete disregard for his own safety, Specialist M______ proceeded through an area of known enemy activity to the crash site.  After unsuccessfully attempting to free the pinned pilot and door gunner, he returned to his aircraft for tools to assist him in the rescue operation.  While enroute back to the downed ship, the ordnance in the damaged aircraft exploded, knocking him to the ground.  At this time he was ordered back to the ship by his pilot…and the United States Army."

5.  There are no orders in the applicant's personnel records which show he was awarded the Purple Heart.  His DA Form 20 does not list any wounds as a result of hostile action in item 40 (Wounds).  His name is not included on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.  

6.  The applicant was separated on 17 September 1970.  His DD Form 214 does not show entitlement to award of the Purple Heart.  He subsequently served in the U.S. Army Reserve.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  Paragraph 2-8b(2) states that for the purpose of considering an award of the PH, a “wound” is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained while in action in the face of the armed enemy or as a result of a hostile act of such enemy.  The regulation states that the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury.  The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he was wounded by shrapnel in his left arm and was treated by a medic.  

2.  By regulation, in order to award the Purple Heart it is necessary to establish that a Soldier was wounded in action, that the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the treatment record must have been made a matter of official record.  However, there are no medical documents available which indicate the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action and his name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

3.  General orders show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device (First Oak Leaf Cluster) for action on 4 July 1969.  However, these orders do not indicate he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  

4.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090006799





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090006799



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006831

    Original file (20120006831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states the aircraft commander and he were severely injured and medically evacuated to the 67th Evacuation Hospital at Pleiku and to the 61st Medical Battalion in Qui Nhon. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 16 October 1971 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 30 September 1980 * Honorable Discharge Certificate * Self-authored memoir of the events that led to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005433

    Original file (20150005433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By that time the enemy force had moved within 100 meters and despite helicopter gun ship support, the helicopters were raked by crew served automatic weapons fire and small arms as they landed. The commander ordered that aircraft to pick him up, with his aircraft following in support. [Applicant's] fire kept the enemy away from them.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012127

    Original file (20100012127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The two eyewitness statements provided by the applicant both give an account of the helicopter hovering, in an attempt to drop supplies in an LZ which was under direct enemy fire. The report, which was performed at the time, shows that the helicopter crash in which the applicant was injured was investigated and determined by safety officials to have been the result of an accident, not the result of enemy action or sabotage. Two eyewitness accounts of the incident state the helicopter was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004386

    Original file (20110004386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The human remains recovered from the crash site were so limited they precluded any determination of the cause of death and the 10 April 2009 Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command J-2 Report does not address the cause of the crash. The only evidence to document the cause of the crash is the statement from Mr. Vek that he shot down the aircraft. His statement is supported by his military award for shooting down a helicopter in the location of and at the time the FSM's aircraft went missing.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019638

    Original file (20110019638.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * 2 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Forms 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claims), dated 12 August 2008 and 22 August 2011 * VA Form 21-4142 (Authorization and Consent to Release Information to the VA), dated 24 September 2011 * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Form 232 (Technical Report - U.S. Army Aircraft Accident), dated 24 October 1966 * Medical Evaluation * Transmittal letter, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010867

    Original file (20070010867.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 1300 (Report of Casualty), dated 17 November 1967, shows that the casualty status was "Non Battle" and that the FSM died on 8 November 1967 in the Republic of Vietnam as a result of injuries sustained while a pilot of military aircraft which crashed into the water. Because there was no definitive determination that the crash was caused by hostile action, and not the result of mechanical failure or other accident, regrettably there is insufficient evidence on which to base award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018483

    Original file (20110018483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Air Medal with 9th Oak Leaf Cluster and "V" Device * Purple Heart * Any additional awards and decorations to which he is entitled 2. Counsel requests the applicant be awarded the Purple Heart for injuries sustained while serving during combat in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). A review of his personnel service records failed to show evidence and he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004049

    Original file (20080004049.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a self-authored letter, dated 28 February 2008; a DD Form 214 that was issued to him on 17 April 1969; a DD Form 214 that was issued at the time of his release from discharge for physical disability on 29 June 1970; a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); orders, dated 27 July 1968, which awarded him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 26 July 1968; a Standard Form (SF) 600 (Health Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care), which appears to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019081

    Original file (20140019081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record contains numerous documents that show he was involved in an aviation accident on 10 February 1969, in which the CH-47 Chinook helicopter he co-piloted crashed while he and fellow crewmembers were conducting resupply operations at Firebase Erskine. Documentation and witnesses indicate enemy ground fire caused the crash of the CH-47 Chinook helicopter on 10 February 1969, which wounded the entire crew and killed 3 Marines. The evidence of record does not support the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016118

    Original file (20090016118.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She also indicates that search and rescue did not indicate weather as being a factor in the search effort started within 2 hours of the crash and that the investigating authority properly declared the cause of the crash as "unknown" and without evidence of hostile fire postulated pilot error as a likely cause since mechanical malfunctions and radio problems could be reasonably eliminated and evidence of hostile fire existed. The applicant provides a letter, dated 10 April 2003, from the...