Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004894
Original file (20090004894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE: 	       4 August 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004894 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that items 24a(1) (Net Service This Period), 24a(3) (Total), and 24b (Total Active Service) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he served more than 1 year of service, not 5 months and 9 days.

3.  The applicant provides his Armed Forces of the United States identification card and a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 September 1965 and he trained as a pioneer.  On 17 August 1966, he was discharged with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Undesirable Habits and Traits of Character) for unfitness.

3.  Item 11d (Effective Date) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 17 August 1966.  Item 16 (Date Inducted) of his DD Form 214 shows he was inducted on 1 September 1965.  Items 24a(1), 24a(3), and 24(b) of his DD Form 214 show he completed 5 months and 9 days.  Item 32 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry, "188 days lost under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972; from 7 Feb 66 thru 29 Mar 66; from 2 Apr 66 thru 2 Apr 66; from 4 Apr 66 thru 17 Aug 66."

4.  Item 44 (Time Lost Under Section 972, Title 10, U.S. Code, and Subsequent to Normal Date ETS [Expiration Term of Service]) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he had 188 days of lost time during the periods 7 February 1966 to 29 March 1966 (51 days), 2 April 1966 to 2 April 1966 (1 day), and 4 April 1966 to 17 August 1966 (136 days).

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation, in effect at the time, stated, in pertinent part, that lost time under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972, and time lost subsequent to normal expiration of term of service will be subtracted from item 24a(1).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Evidence of record shows the applicant's total service extended from 1 September 1965 to 17 August 1966 for a period of 11 months and 17 days.  However, he was AWOL for 188 days, which equates to 6 months and 8 days.  Therefore, his 6 months of lost time was subtracted from his total service in accordance with the governing regulation.  As a result, items 24a(1), 24a(3) and 24b of his DD Form 214 correctly show he completed 5 months and 9 days of creditable service of his 2-year active duty obligation.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  __X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004894



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004894



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019660

    Original file (20080019660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 24 (Statement of Service) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the correct amount of active service completed. On 27 January 1965, the applicant's suspended sentence to confinement at hard labor for 3 months was vacated and the unexecuted portion of the applicant’s sentence was ordered executed. For enlisted personnel, if an individual has lost any time prior to normal expiration...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012887

    Original file (20080012887.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's available military records show he was ordered to active duty from the United States Army Reserve (USAR). The evidence shows the applicant entered active duty for 4 months ADUTRA on 29 November 1965, with prior service in the USAR. In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is not entitled to correction to Items 24a(1) and 24b of his DD Form 214, dated 22 April 1966, to show that he completed 8 months and 25 days of total active duty service and thus...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021452

    Original file (20090021452.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Items 8 (Prior Military Service) of his DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) indicates he previously served as a cadet in the USCG Academy from 10 July 1959 to 28 December 1960. He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of total Army active service which is correctly shown in items 24a (1) of his DD Form 214. With respect to item 24b, his DD Form 214 correctly shows completion of 1 year, 5 months, and 8 days of active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012518

    Original file (20100012518.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 11d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 25 July 1966 to show 2 August 1967. The applicant states * Item 11d of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 July 1966 should show 2 August 1967 * The entries in items 24 are wrong and only show he served 7 days of service 3. Evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted on 19 July 1966 and discharged on 25 July 1966 after serving 7 days for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015841

    Original file (20140015841.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), ending on 30 September 1966, as follows: * Item 6 (Date of Birth (DOB), from 6 June 1927 to 6 May 1927 * Item 7a (Race) from NA to American Indian * Item 15 (Selective Service Local Board Number, City, County, and State) from NA to Board Number 3 * Item 16 (Date Inducted), from blank to actual date of induction * Item 24b (Total Active Service) from 20 years, 6 months,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017409

    Original file (20140017409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 188 (Extract Copy of Morning Report), dated 10 December 1965, indicates the following duty status changes pertaining to the applicant: * Duty to AWOL 0600 hours, 8 November 1965 * AWOL to absent sick (injury) automobile accident, Great Lakes Naval Hospital, effective 15 November 1965, Line of Duty undetermined 7. His DD Form 214 shows: a. his characterization of service was honorable; b. he completed 10 months and 20 days of creditable active duty service; and c. he had 8 days of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004729C071108

    Original file (20070004729C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Rowland C. Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that the days lost in block 29 (Dates of Time Lost During This Period) are incorrect. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting 97 days...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015021

    Original file (20130015021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 24a(1) (Net Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer of Discharge) ending on 2 May 1966. His record contains the following documents issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Reception Station: * SO Number 101, dated 3 May 1966, enlisting him in the Regular Army (RA) on 3 May 1966 for 3 years * amendment of DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge memorandum, dated 5 May 1966, wherein his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011695

    Original file (20100011695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer and Discharge) be changed to show he was separated on 11 February 1967. Notwithstanding the entry in item 29 of the applicant’s DA Form 20, there is no convincing evidence that the applicant served in Germany through 11 February 1967 and was therefore discharged that same day. This information is consistent with his orders, unit clearance papers, and the 11 months and 28 days of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000716

    Original file (20090000716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he accrued a total of 3 days of time lost and not 22 days as is indicated. The record shows the ADRB reviewed the applicant's case on 19 March 1952, and after careful consideration of the evidence of record and independent evidence submitted by the applicant, determined he was properly discharged and voted to deny the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. Therefore, absent any evidence of record or...