IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: April 14, 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080019660
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 24 (Statement of Service) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the correct amount of active service completed.
2. The applicant states that item 24 on his DD Form 214 is incorrect.
3. The applicant provides his DD Forms 214, dated 25 May 1965, in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 25 May 1964. He completed basic combat training at Fort Leonard Wood, MO, on 31 July 1964, and proceeded to Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN, on 14 August 1964 for advanced individual training.
3. On 13 October 1964, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for being absent without leave (AWOL) during the period on or about 1 October through
4 October 1964. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of $20.00 pay, 10 days of extra duty, and 10 days of restriction.
4. On 29 December 1964, the applicant pled guilty at a Special Court Martial to one specification of being AWOL during the period 2 November though
29 November 1964. The Court sentenced him to reduction to private (PV1)/E-1 and confinement at hard labor for 3 months (suspended for 3 months). The sentence was adjudged and approved on 29 December 1964.
5. On 5 January 1965, the applicant departed his unit in an AWOL status. He returned to his unit on 15 January 1965. However, he again departed his unit in an AWOL status on 17 January 1965 and returned to his unit on 18 January 1965.
6. On 27 January 1965, the applicant's suspended sentence to confinement at hard labor for 3 months was vacated and the unexecuted portion of the applicants sentence was ordered executed.
7. On 11 February 1965, the applicant pled guilty at a Special Court-Martial to two specifications of being AWOL during the periods 5 January 1965 through
16 January 1965 and 17 January through 18 January 1965. The applicant was sentenced to reduction to PVT/E-1, confinement at hard labor for 6 months, and a forfeiture of $50.00 pay per month for 6 months. The sentence was adjudged and approved on 11 February 1965.
8. On 22 April 1965, the applicants immediate commander initiated elimination action against the applicant by reason of unfitness.
9. On 6 May 1965, the separation authority approved the applicants elimination from the service and directed he be furnished a General Discharge Certificate. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 25 May 1965. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged with a character of service of under honorable conditions (General). Items 24a(1) (Net Service This Period) and 24b
(Total Active Service) show the entry 0 6 11 indicating he completed a total of
6 months and 11 days of creditable active military service. Item 32 (Remarks) of this form shows the applicant had 170 days of lost time under Title 10, U.S. Code (UCS), section 972.
10. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. The regulation directs, in pertinent part, that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service. It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate. Chapter 2 of the regulation, in effect at the time, contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214. A break-down of item 24 for enlisted personnel is as follows:
a. item 24a(1) shows the total service completed between the dates shown in item 16 (Date Inducted) or 19c (Date of Entry) and item 11d (Effective Date) of the DD Form 214, less time lost under Title 10, USC, section 972, and time lost subsequent to normal expiration of term of service;
b. item 24a(2) shows all prior service excluding any service shown in item 24a(1), and includes any period served in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) or the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) as a reservist not on active duty during current enlistment;
c. item 24a(3) shows the total of items 24a(1) and 24a(2);
d. item 24b shows the total active service the individual has completed beginning with the earliest period of active service up to an including current period of active duty, less any period served in the USAR or ARNGUS not on active duty, and less time lost under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972. Additionally, an explanation of lost time should be entered in item 32;
e. item 32 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks. For enlisted personnel, if an individual has lost any time prior to normal expiration of term of service (ETS) as indicated in section 6 of the DA Form 24 (Service Record), an entry is made here to show the total number of days lost with inclusive dates (for example 4 days lost under 10 USC 972 from 10 November 19xx through 13 November 19xx).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that his total active service is incorrectly shown on his DD Form 214.
2. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 May 1964 and was discharged on 25 May 1965. He would have been credited with 1 year and 1 day of active service had he not lost a total of 170 days due to being AWOL and/or confinement. Lost time that is not made good is deducted from a members period of service. Accordingly, the applicants total period of service was adjusted by subtracting his lost time. Therefore, the entry on the applicants DD Form 214 is correct and requires no further correction.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement. Therefore, he is not entitled to relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x____ ___x____ ____x___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________x____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080019660
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080019660
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004894
The applicant states, in effect, that he served more than 1 year of service, not 5 months and 9 days. Items 24a(1), 24a(3), and 24(b) of his DD Form 214 show he completed 5 months and 9 days. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of record shows the applicant's total service extended from 1 September 1965 to 17 August 1966 for a period of 11 months and 17 days.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011695
The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer and Discharge) be changed to show he was separated on 11 February 1967. Notwithstanding the entry in item 29 of the applicants DA Form 20, there is no convincing evidence that the applicant served in Germany through 11 February 1967 and was therefore discharged that same day. This information is consistent with his orders, unit clearance papers, and the 11 months and 28 days of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015841
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), ending on 30 September 1966, as follows: * Item 6 (Date of Birth (DOB), from 6 June 1927 to 6 May 1927 * Item 7a (Race) from NA to American Indian * Item 15 (Selective Service Local Board Number, City, County, and State) from NA to Board Number 3 * Item 16 (Date Inducted), from blank to actual date of induction * Item 24b (Total Active Service) from 20 years, 6 months,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021452
Items 8 (Prior Military Service) of his DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) indicates he previously served as a cadet in the USCG Academy from 10 July 1959 to 28 December 1960. He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of total Army active service which is correctly shown in items 24a (1) of his DD Form 214. With respect to item 24b, his DD Form 214 correctly shows completion of 1 year, 5 months, and 8 days of active service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014132
The applicant states, in effect, that item 22 of his DD Form 214 does not show his dates of creditable service. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 6 July 1964 for 3 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing in Item 22c of the applicant's DD Form 214 a credit of 7 months and 10 days and providing him a corrected separation document as a result of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012887
The applicant's available military records show he was ordered to active duty from the United States Army Reserve (USAR). The evidence shows the applicant entered active duty for 4 months ADUTRA on 29 November 1965, with prior service in the USAR. In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is not entitled to correction to Items 24a(1) and 24b of his DD Form 214, dated 22 April 1966, to show that he completed 8 months and 25 days of total active duty service and thus...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059242C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army on 11 August 1964. His DD Form 214, items 24a(1), 24a(3), and 24b show his net service that period, total service, and total active service, respectively, as 1 year, 1 month, and 14 days.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010604C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to list his total period of military service in the Regular Army and in the Maryland Army National Guard (MDARNG). An NGB Form 22 shows he had served in the MDARNG for 8 months and 8 days and was honorably discharged on 13 April 1961 to enlist in the Regular Army. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000716
The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he accrued a total of 3 days of time lost and not 22 days as is indicated. The record shows the ADRB reviewed the applicant's case on 19 March 1952, and after careful consideration of the evidence of record and independent evidence submitted by the applicant, determined he was properly discharged and voted to deny the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. Therefore, absent any evidence of record or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007482
His record contains a: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 2 July 1964, that does not list an SSN * DA Form 41 (Record of Emergency Data), dated 2 July 1964, that lists in item 7 (SSN) the entry "None" * DA Form 24 (Service Record) for the period 2 July 1964 through 5 October 1965 that shows the same SSN as shown on his DD Form 214 that was corrected by a pen and ink correction to show the same SSN he claims is correct * DA Form 20 (Enlisted...