Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004876
Original file (20090004876.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	1 September 2009  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004876 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.

2.  The applicant states that he was a combat photographer for a period of
9 months in the Republic of Vietnam but was not awarded the Vietnam Service Medal or Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.  

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214 and letters of support from his former commanders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 23 January 1970, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for 3 years.  He completed his initial training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 84C (Motion Picture Photographer).

3.  First Basic Combat Training Brigade, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry, Fort Ord, CA, Special Orders Number 48, dated 14 March 1970, awarded the applicant the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

4.  On 31 July 1970, the applicant departed Fort Monmouth, NJ for duty in Hawaii.  He was assigned for duty with the U.S. Army Special Photographic Detachment on 26 August 1970.

5.  On 23 February 1973, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He had attained the rank of specialist five (SP5), pay grade E-5 and he had completed 3 years, 1 month, and 1 day of creditable active duty service.

6.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal.  It does not show award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.

7.  In a letter dated 1 March 2009, the former commander of the Special Photographic Detachment from 14 May 1970 until March 1971 wrote that, beginning in September 1970, the applicant participated in 90-day assignments to the Republic of Vietnam.  The author cannot recall exact dates.  While on these temporary duty assignments, the applicant was not under the operational control of any in-country command and he was responsive only to requests generated by the Department of the Army staff.  The author also provided a copy of his DD Form 214 showing that at the time of his release from active duty, his last assignment was with the U.S. Army Special Photographic Detachment in Hawaii.

8.  In a letter dated 1 March 2009, the follow-on former commander of the Special Photographic Detachment from 4 January 1971 to February 1974 wrote that he recalled the applicant being a member of the unit when he arrived.  The applicant had completed multiple trips to the Republic of Vietnam for periods up to approximately 3 months at a time.  The applicant provided meritorious service to his country in difficult and sometimes dangerous situations.


9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.  This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after       3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included service on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days in the Republic of Vietnam or contiguous areas, except that time limit may be waived for personnel participating in actual combat operations.  A bronze service star is authorized for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each designated campaign (1) while assigned or attached to and present for duty with a unit during the period in which it participated in combat or (2) under orders in the combat zone and in addition meets any of several requirements including:  being awarded a combat decoration; being furnished a certificate by a commanding general of a corps, higher unit, or independent force that he actually participate in combat; or serving at a normal post of duty.  

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).  This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.

2.  The available evidence convincingly shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam on more than one occasion in a temporary duty status as a motion picture photographer.  However, he was not attached to or regularly serving with any organization that participated in or directly supported military operations in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is authorized award of the Vietnam Service Medal without a bronze service star. 

3.  Special Orders show that the applicant was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.  Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award.

4.  The available evidence does not confirm that the applicant served a qualifying period (6 months) in the Republic of Vietnam for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.  Therefore, there is an insufficient basis for granting the applicant's requested relief on this issue.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

_____x___  ___x_____  _____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004876



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004876



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003268

    Original file (20150003268.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. The regulation in effect at the time provided that the total active duty service outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which the service was performed would be entered in item 22c. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011283

    Original file (20100011283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Air Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, or a marksmanship qualification badge with Rifle (M-14) Bar. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019301

    Original file (20130019301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: a. his service in Vietnam and Korea; and b. award of the Vietnam Service Medal. The applicant states: * his Congressman helped him obtain additional documents from his medical records which show he served more than 5 months in Vietnam * he obtained notarized eyewitness statements from former fellow unit members who confirm his service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101626C070208

    Original file (2004101626C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart, with Two Oak Leaf Clusters, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Vietnam Service Medal [it is believed the applicant meant the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, since the Vietnam Service Medal is shown on separation document] be added to his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States, Report of Transfer or Discharge. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records to show that he was awarded the Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003400

    Original file (20120003400.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The NPRC award replacement authorization letters state the applicant's awards include the Air Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Automatic Rifle Bar, and the Army Aviation - Aircraft Crewman Badge. The fact that another Soldier,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010484

    Original file (20110010484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 20 May 1968 to on or about 17 August 1970. Records show he participated in eight campaigns during his service in Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show 1 silver service star and 3 bronze service stars, to be affixed to his previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 3 January 1968 through 18 August 1970; b. Amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019658

    Original file (20090019658.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for the award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by permanently awarding him the Basic Aviation Badge. The Board also recommends item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 with an effective date of 1 December 1971 be amended to show he was awarded or is authorized the: * Basic Aviation Badge * Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000975

    Original file (20150000975.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) – * Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 506th Infantry from 19 September 1968 to 20 September 1969 * 198th Medical Detachment 2 from 2 September 1969 to 26 March 1970 * Exclusively ”excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings c. Item 40 (Wounds) – fragment wounds left knee, 14 January 1969 d. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Meritorious...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007718

    Original file (20090007718.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was wounded in action on 23 May 1968 and again on 19 September 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014811

    Original file (20080014811.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Records show that the applicant participated in two campaign periods during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 19 June...