Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010484
Original file (20110010484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110010484


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award.

2.  The applicant states he served for 2 years, 2 months, and 28 days, during the Vietnam War, which qualifies him for the AGCM.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim)
* DD Form 214
* Special Orders Number 230, Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Oakland, CA, dated 18 August 1970
* internet printout on the AGCM from Wikipedia.com

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 January 1968.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 51B (Carpenter).

3.  His records show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about      20 May 1968 to on or about 17 August 1970.  During his service in Vietnam he was assigned to the:

* 508th Engineer Detachment, from on or about 25 May 1968 to on or about 9 November 1968
* 213th Engineer Detachment, from on or about 10 November 1968 to on or about 17 August 1970

4.  On 18 August 1970, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 7 months, and 16 days of net service during this period of active duty, including 2 years, 2 months, and 28 days of foreign service.  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four (SP4)/E-4.

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* National Campaign Medal [sic]

6.  There is no evidence in the available records that shows he was awarded the AGCM; however, there is no evidence of a commander's disqualification for the award.  Additionally, there is no evidence of any convictions by courts-martial or receipt of nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).  

7.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he consistently received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service.  


8.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the AGCM.
 
9.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

10.  A review of the applicant's records indicates he is entitled to additional awards which are not shown on his DD Form 214.

11.  Special Orders Number 41, Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Campbell, KY, dated 14 February 1968, awarded him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).

12.  Special Orders Number 121, Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Leonard Wood, Fort Leonard Wood, MO, dated 30 April 1968, awarded him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.

14.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the units to which the applicant was assigned, subordinate to the U.S. Military Assistance Command, were cited for the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for the period          8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973, by Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974.


15.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with the Vietnam Service Medal for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  A silver service star is authorized to be worn in lieu of five bronze service stars.  Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following eight campaigns: 

* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase IV (2 April 1968 – 30 June 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V (1 July 1968 – 1 November 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI (2 November 1968 – 22 February 1969)
* Tet 69 Counteroffensive, 1969 (23 February 1969 – 8 June 1969)
* Vietnam Summer – Fall 1969	(9 June 1969 – 31 October 1969)
* Vietnam Winter – Spring 1970 (1 November 1969 – 30 April 1970)
* Sanctuary Counteroffensive (1 May 1970 – 30 June 1970)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII	(1 July 1970 – 30 June 1971)

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requested the AGCM, for service on active duty between          3 January 1968 and 18 August 1970.  The evidence of record shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service, and there is no evidence he was subject to any disciplinary or derogatory actions during his period of service.  There is no evidence of a commander's disqualification statement pertaining to his first award of the AGCM; therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award), for the period 3 January 1968 through 18 August 1970, and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

2.  Special orders awarded him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), which are not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards.

3.  The applicant served a qualifying period of service in Vietnam for entitlement to the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960); however, it is believed that this award is erroneously represented on his DD Form 214 by the entry "National Campaign Medal."  Therefore, it would be appropriate to delete the erroneous entry "National Campaign Medal," and replace it with the proper entry for the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).

4.  General orders awarded his unit in Vietnam the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, during his period of assignment with the unit; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award.

5.  Records show he participated in eight campaigns during his service in Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show          1 silver service star and 3 bronze service stars, to be affixed to his previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period   3 January 1968 through 18 August 1970;

   b. Amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 to delete the entry "National Campaign Medal;" and 

   c. Amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 to add the: 

* AGCM (1st Award)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* 1 silver service star and 3 bronze service stars to be affixed to his previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal

      
      
      ____________x__________
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015543



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010484



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003435

    Original file (20090003435.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. Although there are no orders awarding him the AGCM, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 16 September 1968 through 22 April 1970. Therefore, since he had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010983

    Original file (20120010983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision pertaining to his request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 4 December 1967 to 6 November 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026974

    Original file (20100026974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add: * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with bronze service stars * Vietnam Campaign Medal [Correctly known as the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960)] * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 1st Oak Leaf Cluster [indicating 2nd Award] * Expert...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013379

    Original file (20110013379.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 20 * Special Orders Number 39, Headquarters, U.S. Army Combat Surveillance School/Training Center, Fort Huachuca, AZ, dated 8 February 1968 * Republic of Vietnam Certificate of Service * an extract of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) * Record of Proceedings, Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR2000050662 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. With respect...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008074

    Original file (20090008074.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also contains Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam, General Orders 610, dated 8 March 1970, which awarded him the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for his meritorious service in the RVN during the period July 1969 through April 1970. The regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's REFRAD provided for entering all awards earned during the period in item 24 and periods of RVN service in item 30. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015621

    Original file (20060015621.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to correction of his records to show the award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the: a. AGCM first award for the period 24 July 1967 to 1 March 1970, Air Medal Fourth Award with "V" Device, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, Aircraft Crewman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015065

    Original file (20080015065.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080015065 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 7 May 1970, be corrected to add the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with 4 bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device (1960), Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028578

    Original file (20100028578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * correction of the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) letter, dated 11 November 2010, to show his correct name and award of the Legion of Merit (LOM) * correction of the NPRC letter to show three awards of the Overseas Service Medal instead of the Overseas Service Ribbon * copies of the orders and the citation for award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device 2. The applicant states: * he was awarded the LOM upon retirement * he completed two tours of duty in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012147

    Original file (20140012147 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to show any evidence that he was awarded or authorized the AM, ARCOM for meritorious service (or meritorious achievement), or the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14) Bar. The applicant's military personnel records fail to reveal evidence of a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (1st Award). As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013132

    Original file (20080013132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show all awards to which he is entitled. The evidence of record includes official orders awarding the applicant the PH and the BSM and these awards were omitted from Item 24 of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...