Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004721
Original file (20090004721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        1 September 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004721 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) be corrected in Item 38 (Record of Assignments) to show only one entry for AWOL (absent without leave).

2.  The applicant states he was only AWOL on one occasion.

3.  The applicant provides page 3 (containing Item 38 entries) of his DA Form 20.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 29 August 1972.  During the period 2 October 1973 through 9 January 1974, he was AWOL from Fort Sill, 
OK and dropped from the rolls (DFR) of the Army as a deserter.  On 10 January 1974, he was apprehended by civil authorities in Memphis, TN and returned to military control at Fort Campbell, KY and assigned to the Personnel Control Facility (PCF).

3.  While assigned to the PCF, the applicant again went AWOL from 8 February 1974 through 3 April 1974.  His AWOL ended when he voluntarily returned to military control at the Fort Campbell PCF on 4 April 1974.

4.  DA Forms 188 (Extract Copy of Morning Report) confirm the applicant’s two separate periods of AWOL.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he was only AWOL from 2 October 1973 through 9 January 1974, and requests a second period of AWOL from 8 February 1974 through 3 April 1974 be removed from his records.

2.  Records show the applicant went AWOL from the Fort Campbell PCF on
8 February 1974, after having been AWOL from Fort Sill for 100 days, and surrendered to military control on 4 April 1974.

3.  The applicant’s records correctly reflect his two periods of AWOL totaling 155 days of lost time.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004721



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004721



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003134

    Original file (20090003134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge or general discharge under honorable conditions. Item 38 (Record of Assignments), in pertinent part, shows he was assigned to Company A, 65th Engineer Battalion, 25th Infantry Division (USARPAC, RVN) from 22 October 1969 through 8 October 1970. c. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations), in pertinent part, shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart per Headquarters,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065903C070421

    Original file (2001065903C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Department of the Army, Headquarters, United States Army Field Artillery Center and Fort Sill, Fort Sill, Oklahoma, Special Orders Number 340 reflects that the applicant was discharged by board action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 for the good of the service with a UD. It states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090169C070212

    Original file (2003090169C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also states that the discharge authority was asked to waive rehabilitation action on the basis of his commander's recommendation that he had served in four units. year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) should commence on the date of final action by the ADRB. In an unsworn statement, presented by the applicant during his court-martial, the applicant indicated that he had been a corporal when he was first punished under Article 15 of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007361

    Original file (20090007361.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Soldier listed on the SPCM orders has the same name as the applicant; however, the Service Number listed on the orders is different from the applicant's. Therefore, the SPCM order in question was clearly filed in his record as a result of an administrative error and should be removed from his record at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Headquarters, Special Troops, Fort Campbell,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102910C070208

    Original file (2004102910C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that on 30 July 1980, the applicant consulted with counsel and submitted a request for discharge from the service under chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board during its 15-year statute of limitations for an upgrade of her discharge. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate, but the separation authority may direct a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001617

    Original file (20110001617.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Item 6 (MOS) of his DA Form 2-1 shows his MOS as 57E. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any to show he completed training and was awarded MOS 36K.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015193

    Original file (20080015193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 March 1974, the applicant requested a discharge for the good of the Service - in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel). The applicant's military service records contain his DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 16 April 1974, with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate, with service characterized as under other than honorable conditions, in accordance with the provisions of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04106173C070208

    Original file (04106173C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a majority decision, the board granted his request to upgrade his discharge to honorable; however, did not change the reason for his discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 shows that a Soldier separated for misconduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, will have a separation code of JKQ entered on his DD Form 214. h. Item 27 – Reentry code. The applicant was discharged on 5 April 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067039C070402

    Original file (2002067039C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 July 1979, the applicant departed his unit at Fort Stewart in an AWOL status and remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Leonard Wood on 21 August 1979. On the same date, after consulting with counsel about his rights, the applicant requested discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The Board noted the applicant's contentions; however, the Board found no evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001435

    Original file (20150001435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In his request for discharge, he indicated he understood that if his request for discharge was accepted, he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. The applicant's record contains no documentation that shows he submitted a request for a hardship discharge or compassionate reassignment.