Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004615
Original file (20090004615.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 August 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004615 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that an entry in item 18 (Remarks) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected.

2.  The applicant states that the entry "FULL SEPARATION" in item 18 on his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show "SEVERANCE PAY."  He contends that his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) shows "Separation with Severance Pay" not "Full Separation."  He also claims that he was supposed to receive retired pay at age 60 instead of severance pay but he got the "run of round."  He points out that he would like to retire at age 60 and pay off the severance pay.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214; a DA Form 199; and discharge orders from the Army National Guard in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was ordered to active duty from the Army National Guard on 
9 December 1996.  He trained as a maintenance supervisor and an automated logistical specialist.  

2.  On 22 August 2006, a PEB found the applicant physically unfit due to right ankle osteoarthritis.  The PEB recommended a combined rating of 10 percent and that the applicant be separated with severance pay.  On 13 September 2006, the applicant concurred with the PEB’s findings and waived a formal hearing.   
3.  On 13 September 2006, the applicant was afforded the opportunity to transfer to an inactive status or be discharged with severance pay.  He elected to be discharged with entitlement to receive disability severance pay.  He acknowledged he understood that this election was final and conclusive for all purposes and may not be changed.  He also acknowledged that "I understand by making this election I will not be entitled to receive or apply for Guard retirement." 

4.  On 31 October 2006, the applicant was honorably released from active duty by reason of physical disability with severance pay. 

5.  Item 18 on the applicant's DD Form 214 states, in pertinent part, "ENTITLED TO FULL SEPARATION PAY IN THE AMOUNT OF $92,174.40."  

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation states, in pertinent part, that for a Soldier receiving separation/readjustment or non-disability severance pay (as indicated by the finance office), enter the type of pay and amount in item 18 on the DD Form 214.   

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows the applicant was released from active duty by reason of physical disability with severance pay.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the entry "ENTITLED TO FULL SEPARATION PAY IN THE AMOUNT OF $92,174.40" in item 18 on his DD Form 214 to show "ENTITLED TO SEVERANCE PAY IN THE AMOUNT OF $92,174.40."

2.  The applicant's contention that he was supposed to receive retired pay at age 60 was noted.  However, he did not elect to be transferred to the Retired Reserve with entitlement to apply for retirement benefits upon reaching age 60.  Evidence of record shows he concurred with the PEB's findings and he elected to be discharged with entitlement to receive disability severance pay.  In addition, he acknowledged he understood that this election was final and conclusive for all purposes and may not be changed.  He further acknowledged that "I understand by making this election I will not be entitled to receive or apply for Guard retirement." 







BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: 

	a.  deleting the entry "ENTITLED TO FULL SEPARATION PAY IN THE AMOUNT OF $92,174.40" in item 18 on his DD Form 214; and

	b.  adding the entry "ENTITLED TO SEVERANCE PAY IN THE AMOUNT OF $92,174.40" in item 18 on his DD Form 214.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004615



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004615



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021668

    Original file (20110021668.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she was transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60 instead of discharged due to disability with severance pay. In view of the foregoing, the applicant's record should be corrected to show she elected Reserve Retirement in lieu of severance pay as follows: a. correcting her DD Form 214 and/or any related documents to show she was separated due to physical disability - other with an SPD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000043C070205

    Original file (20060000043C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states the civilian handling his case recommended he not take the 10 percent severance pay because he would have to pay it back when he started to receive his retired pay. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 21 August 2005 and his DA Form 199 (Physical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007277

    Original file (20120007277.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states a physical evaluation board (PEB) found him unfit for service and recommended his discharge with severance pay. In a memorandum from the applicant to the USAPDA, Subject: Disability Election: Separation with Severance Pay or Transfer to the Retired Reserve, dated 7 September 2004, he provided his election of severance pay or transfer to the Retired Reserve. e. He also provided the following additional documentation in response the advisory opinion: * a memorandum from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001278

    Original file (20110001278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AHRC stated the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code [on his DD Form 214] would be "LBK" based on completion of required active service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4. b. AHRC directed the TC to enter the following statement in item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214: "The Soldier has been separated by reason of physical disability and has elected Reserve Retirement In-Lieu of Severance; No Severance Pay is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018547

    Original file (20070018547.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined that he was medically unfit and recommended separating him for disability with severance pay. The applicant underwent a PEB that determined he was physically unfit and recommended his separation for disability with severance pay. Evidence of record shows that the applicant did not receive the severance pay indicated on his separation orders or his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004167

    Original file (20130004167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she was transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60 instead of discharged due to disability with severance pay. Army Regulation 635-40 states that when a Soldier has a disability rating of less than 30 percent and has at least 20 qualifying years for retirement for non-Regular service, "You have the option of accepting discharge with disability severance pay and forfeiting retirement for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026196

    Original file (20100026196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant elected not to concur with the PEB's findings and recommendations and requested a formal hearing. b. the PEB also noted the applicant had a rating of less than 30% and at least 20 qualifying years of service for Reserve retirement under the provisions of chapter 67 of Title 10, U.S. Code (USC); therefore, he had the option of accepting disability severance pay and forfeiting his Reserve retirement pay, or he had the option of requesting a transfer to inactive Reserve status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019406

    Original file (20100019406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his records be corrected so that he may receive retired pay at age 60. Since he was originally eligible for retired pay at age 60, has repaid his severance pay, and his orders and NGB Form 22 assigned him to the Retired Reserve, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct his record by voiding his 30 September 1991 disability discharge with severance pay and to show he was transferred to Retired Reserve on that same date. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012639

    Original file (20080012639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the State of North Carolina published orders on 2 January 1996 which indicate the applicant was being processed for separation and that he was authorized disability severance pay. Since it appears the applicant was not properly informed that if he accepted severance pay then he would not be eligible for retired pay, and since he understands that granting his request would require him to pay back his severance pay, it would be equitable to restore the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028826

    Original file (20100028826.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would like his DD Form 214 to show the proper disability rating at the time of his retirement. The applicant provides his DD Form 214, dated 31 December 2001, and a DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings). His DD Form 214 appropriately shows he was retired on 31 December 2001 for the purpose of early retirement under TERA with a type of separation of "Voluntary Early Retirement"; a separation authority of "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 12"; a separation code of...