Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004381
Original file (20090004381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	27 August 2009  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090004381 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from "4" to "3."

2.  The applicant states that he made an error in judgment while he was home on Christmas Exodus leave.  He also states that he completed the Army Substance Abuse Program prior to being discharged, he maintains a steady job, he has not violated the law, and he has changed his life.  He concludes by stating that he is physically qualified to join the military, but he needs his RE code changed to be considered for a waiver.

3.  The applicant provides a course completion certificate, DD Form 214, and a Report of Mental Status Evaluation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s record shows that he enlisted in the U.S. Army National Guard on 19 May 2007 and entered active duty on 21 November 2007.

2.  The applicant provided his Army Substance Abuse Program certificate that shows, on 12 February 2008, he satisfactorily completed the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention Training Class.


3.  On 31 January 2008, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for wrongful use of marijuana between 3 December 2007 and 
3 January 2008.  His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of $620.00, 45 days of restriction, and 45 days of extra duty.

4.  On 1 February 2008, the applicant underwent a mental status evaluation that psychiatrically cleared him for any administrative action deemed appropriate by his command.
 
5.  On 11 February 2008, the applicant’s unit commander notified him of the intent to recommend that he be separated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, commission of a serious offense (testing positive for marijuana).

6.  On 11 February 2008, the applicant consulted with military counsel.  After being advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action, its effects and the rights available to him, the applicant elected to submit a statement on his behalf.  The applicant acknowledged that he may encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if a general discharge under honorable conditions was issued.  He further acknowledged that if he received a discharge certificate/character of service which was less than honorable, he may make an application to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) or to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for an upgrade of his discharge.  He acknowledged that he understood an act of consideration by either board did not imply that his discharge would be upgraded.  The applicant also acknowledged he understood that he would be ineligible to apply for enlistment in the U.S. Army for a period of 2 years after discharge.

7.  On 12 February 2008, the separation authority approved the applicant’s recommendation for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c.  The separation authority directed that the applicant be issued an Uncharacterized Discharge Certificate.

8.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 19 February 2008 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (drug abuse) with uncharacterized service and returned to his Army National Guard unit.  Item 26 shows he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of "JKK" and item 27 shows his RE code as "4."  The applicant was credited with completing 2 months of active service.



9.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administration Separations), sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14-12 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for acts or patterns of misconduct.  Paragraph 14-12c states that specific categories of commission of a serious military or civil offense include abuse of illegal drugs.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.  

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 states in pertinent part, that entry-level status for Army National Guard (ARNG) Soldiers begins upon enlistment in the ARNG or United States Army Reserve.  For Soldiers ordered to Initial Active Duty for Training (IADT) for one continuous period, entry level status terminates 180 days after training begins.  For Soldiers ordered to IADT for the split or alternate training option the period terminates 90 days after beginning Phase II of advanced individual training (AIT).  Soldiers completing Phase I of basic training or basic combat training (BCT) remain in an entry-level status until 90 days after beginning Phase II. 

11.  Additionally, the regulation states, in pertinent part, that the character of service will be uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in entry-level status.

12.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.  An RE code of 1 permits immediate reenlistment if all other criteria are met.  An RE code of 3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.  An RE code of 4 indicates separation from the last period of service with a disqualification which cannot be waived and ineligibility for reenlistment.

13.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 prescribes the specific authorities, reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  This regulation states, in pertinent part, that SPD code of "JKK" applies to persons discharged for misconduct (drug abuse).  

14.  The SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table states that when the SPD is "JKK" then and RE code of 4 will be assigned.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contends that he made an error in judgment, that he maintains a job, that he has turned his life around, and that he desires to reenter the military.  

2.  The available evidence shows the applicant was separated due to drug abuse. Therefore, he was assigned an RE code of 4 which is consistent with the reason for separation.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that his assigned RE code is in error or unjust.  Therefore, he has established no basis for changing his existing RE code.

3.  The evidence of record also confirms the applicant’s discharge processing was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations and the both the narrative reason for separation and the characterization of service are appropriate considering all the facts of the case.

4.  Absent any evidence of error or injustice in the discharge process, the assigned RE code is proper and equitable based on the authority and reason for discharge.  As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support a change of the RE code.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION











BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

      _______ _   _x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004381



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090004381



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012042

    Original file (20120012042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 August 2009, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, by reason of misconduct - commission of a serious offense and directed her service be uncharacterized. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate for a Soldier discharged for patterns of misconduct; however, the discharge authority may direct an honorable or general discharge if such are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001940

    Original file (20090001940.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table indicates that RE code 4 is the proper code to assign members separated with SPD code JKK. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. Evidence of record shows the applicant was recommended and approved for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of abuse of illegal drugs.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007043

    Original file (AR20100007043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense for use and possession of illegal drugs in that he tested positive for cocaine at a unit urinalysis (080104) and received an Article 15 for cocaine (080131), with an entry level separation, uncharacterized discharge. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003703

    Original file (AR20120003703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge and or a change to the narrative reason for discharge on the applicant's DD Form 214. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006616

    Original file (AR20130006616.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: The applicant did not provide any with the application. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013729

    Original file (20130013729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 March 2010, the applicant's commander notified him he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c(2), for misconduct–abuse of illegal drugs. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The RE code on the applicant's DD Form 214 was assigned...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001288

    Original file (AR20130001288.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, in a memorandum for record, the unit commander presented the reason for his recommendation for an honorable discharge; wherein, the chain-of-command had counseled the applicant that if he waived his right for an Administrative Review Board, and had no further incidents of misconduct, he would be recommended for an honorable discharge, and that to date, the applicant had fulfilled the stated requirements for an honorable discharge. On 7 April 2010, the separation authority...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023575

    Original file (20100023575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code JKK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of misconduct (drug abuse). His record shows he accepted nonjudicial punishment for wrongfully using cocaine and his reason for separation was misconduct (drug abuse). As such, evidence shows he was properly discharged and his separation code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012243

    Original file (AR20130012243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates on 5 March 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-drug abuse for wrongfully using cocaine. On 11 March 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008673

    Original file (AR20130008673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 17 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense), for having wrongfully used a controlled substance, to wit: marijuana. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 10 May 2010, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the...