Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003462
Original file (20090003462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE: 	        1 July 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003462 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the mother of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that her late son be posthumously promoted to the rank of sergeant.

2.  The applicant states that the FSM had previously been promoted to sergeant while serving in Iraq but he was reduced in rank after being charged with driving under the influence in July 2005 in Germany.  She contends that the FSM was able to complete the requirements for reinstatement of his rank and that he was to go before the advisory board in January 2006.  However, on 21 December 2005, the FSM died from critical injuries suffered in a car crash on 17 December 2005 in Germany.  The applicant indicates that she is not seeking any additional benefits and that she would like the FSM to be remembered as he would have been if not for the accident, which was not his fault.

3.  The applicant provides a certificate of death; a Report of Casualty; a recommendation for promotion; and a copy of the FSM's Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Evaluation Report in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 August 2000 for a period of 5 years.  He was promoted to sergeant effective 1 December 2003.  On 18 December 2004, he was honorably discharged for immediate reenlistment.  He reenlisted on 19 December 2004 for a period of 4 years.

2.  On 22 August 2005, the applicant was reduced to specialist.
3.  On 21 December 2005, the FSM died as the result of a motor vehicle accident in Germany.  The FSM's certificate of death and Report of Casualty show his rank as specialist.

4.  There is no evidence of record which shows the FSM was recommended for promotion to sergeant by a local promotion selection board prior to his death.

5.  In support of her claim, the applicant provided a recommendation for promotion, dated 2 October 2008, from the FSM's commander at the time in question.  He states, in pertinent part, that the FSM was about to attend the NCO board to regain his rank to sergeant and that if he had not died on 21 December 2005 he would have been shortly promoted to sergeant and moved into a team leader position.  He respectfully requests that the FSM be posthumously promoted to the rank of sergeant.

6.  Paragraph 1-22b(1) of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) states, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for a posthumous promotion a Soldier must have been officially recommended before the date of death.  Promotion to the grades of sergeant and staff sergeant must have been recommended by a local promotion selection board.
 
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence of record which shows the FSM was officially recommended by a local promotion selection board for promotion to sergeant prior to his death on 21 December 2005.  In the absence of such a recommendation, the 2 October 2008 recommendation from the FSM's commander is not sufficient as a basis for a posthumous promotion to the rank of sergeant.  Regrettably, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003462



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003462



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017024

    Original file (20100017024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicants, the parents of a deceased former service member (FSM), request correction of the FSM's record to show: * on the DD Form 261 (Report of Investigation - Line of Duty and Misconduct Status), dated 11 March 2009, the FSM's death was "in line of duty" instead of "not in line of duty - due to own misconduct" * The FSM's promotion to first lieutenant (1LT), effective 26 November 2008 2. The IO's approved findings of the LOD investigation show a finding of "Not in the Line of Duty -...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005520

    Original file (20070005520.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's request for her son, the FSM, to be awarded the Purple Heart and the supporting evidence were carefully considered. The Board noted that the FSM was not recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart by proper authority at the time of his death. As a result the Board recommends that all Department of the Army Records of the former service member be corrected by posthumously awarding him the Purple Heart for the incident resulting in his death and issuing an appropriate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001149

    Original file (20150001149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the mother of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Action Badge. A review of the FSM's military personnel records failed to reveal orders or other evidence that he was awarded the Purple Heart or Combat Action Badge. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Combat Action Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102653C070208

    Original file (2004102653C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief of the Military Awards Branch stated that the basic criteria for award of the Purple Heart required that it be awarded to soldiers for wounds or injuries received as a direct result of enemy action. While the statement described what happened on 21 February 1969, the major general does not state that he was present when the aircraft crashed or that he witnessed the aircraft being hit by enemy fire causing it to crash. Notwithstanding the evidence submitted by the applicant, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007660

    Original file (20090007660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the former service member (FSM) be posthumously promoted to sergeant first class (E-7). The available service medical records do not include any records from the FSM's first period of active duty. The available evidence shows that the applicant was considered by the 1987 SFC promotion board but not selected for promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001912

    Original file (20150001912.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her late husband's records to show she applied for Active Duty Death Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for child-only coverage in a timely manner. Given the circumstances surrounding this case, and based on the applicant's eligibility for Active Duty Death SBP at the time of the FSM's death and her desired SBP election, it would be equitable to correct the FSM's records to show she applied for Active Duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019265

    Original file (20090019265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-4 (Line of Duty Policy, Procedures, and Investigations) prescribes policies and procedures for investigating the circumstances of disease, injury, or death of a soldier. Hostile Casualty – a person who is the victim of a terrorist activity or who becomes a casualty "in action." His death was described as resulting from nonhostile causes because it was not the "direct result of hostile action, sustained in combat."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001737

    Original file (20090001737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show the type of death as hostile instead of non-hostile. The evidence of record shows that the FSM became a casualty due to circumstances not directly attributable to hostile action or terrorist activity. There is no evidence that the helicopter crash was a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005033

    Original file (20090005033 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090005033 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. According to the DD Form 1300 provided by the applicant and contained in the FSM's official military personnel file (OMPF), the FSM died on 22 February 2002 from "injuries received in a government-owned helicopter that crashed" near Basilan Island, Philippines. The evidence clearly shows that the FSM died as a result of a helicopter accident.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004462

    Original file (20110004462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. He was separated in the rank of CPL. There is no evidence the FSM was again advanced to or served in the rank of SGT prior to his discharge.