Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005520
Original file (20070005520.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  4 October 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070005520 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Joyce A. Wright

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Susan A. Powers

Chairperson

Mr. Edward E. Montgomery  

Member

Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, as the mother of the deceased former service member (FSM), in effect, that the FSM be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM was killed in Iraq in May 2005 and that the finding of accidental death should be changed to reflect death as a result of hostile action.  She states that the evidence in the accident investigation report supports the conclusion that the conduct of the Iraqi civilians which caused the vehicle accident was intentional and hostile.  

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored summary of her perception and understanding of the events which led to the death of her son.  

4.  In support of her request the applicant provides several unsigned/unsworn statements from fellow Soldiers who served with her son, the FSM. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 May 2003.  He successfully completed basic combat training and advanced individual training at Fort Knox, Kentucky.  On completion of his OSUT (one station unit training), he was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS), 19K, M-1 Armor Crewman.  The FSM was promoted to sergeant (SGT/E-5) on 1 March 2005.

2.  The FSM was deployed to Iraq in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  

3.  The DD Form 1300 (Report of Casualty) submitted on 21 July 2005 established that the FSM died outside a medical treatment facility as a result of injuries incurred in a non-hostile, vehicular accident.  

4.  The applicant provided several unsworn and unsigned statements from Soldiers who allegedly served with her son, the FSM.  They describe the events that occurred prior to and on the date of the FSM's death. 

5.  On 25 January 2007, the Chief, Military Awards Branch, U. S. Army Human Resources Command (AHRC), prepared a memorandum to a Member of Congress, in reply to his letter, dated 17 January 2007, on behalf of the applicant concerning her desire to have her late son, the FSM, awarded the Purple Heart for injuries he received during his service in Iraq.  After AHRC reviewed the criteria for award of the Purple Heart and the casualty report for the FSM, they advised her he was ineligible for this award because he died in an incident that had been classified, as "non-hostile."  

6.  AHRC advised the applicant if she felt that the decision was unfair or unjust, she had the right to appeal to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).  The ABCMR, was the highest authority for adjudicating these matters. 

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.   The regulation further provided examples of some events or situations that clearly do not justify award of the Purple Heart.  These examples include:  accidents, explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for her son, the FSM, to be awarded the Purple Heart and the supporting evidence were carefully considered.  However, by regulation, in order to support award of the Purple Heart, there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being considered was received as a direct result of, or was caused by hostile enemy action. 

2.  The evidence shows that the FSM died in an incident that was classified as, "non-hostile."  Unfortunately, Soldiers who are accidentally injured or killed in combat zones are not entitled to award of the Purple Heart.  The Board noted that the FSM was not recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart by proper authority at the time of his death.

3.  The applicant contends that the findings in the accident report should be changed to intentional and hostile.  The evidence, she states, supports the conclusions that conduct by Iraqi civilians caused the vehicle accident and their actions were hostile.  

4.  The unsworn and unsigned statements provided by the applicant along with her claim were considered; however, they are inadequate and do not support a change to the information recorded and reported in the report of casualty.  Each of these Soldiers was questioned at the time the accident was being investigated. It is logical to assume they provided a sworn/signed statement at that time. Assuming statements were submitted to investigators by these Soldiers these statements would have more value in deciding the issues(s) before the Board than the currently available statements.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

__SAP___  __EM___  __QS___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board unanimously determined during their review that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  The Board believes that the collision, on 22 May 2005, that resulted in the death of the former service member concerned was cause by hostile action and he is therefore entitled to award of the Purple Heart.

2.  As a result the Board recommends that all Department of the Army Records of the former service member be corrected by posthumously awarding him the Purple Heart for the incident resulting in his death and issuing an appropriate document to reflect this award.




___Susan A. Powers_________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070005520
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20071004
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE
20050522
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
107
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001149

    Original file (20150001149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the mother of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Action Badge. A review of the FSM's military personnel records failed to reveal orders or other evidence that he was awarded the Purple Heart or Combat Action Badge. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Combat Action Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009646

    Original file (20140009646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In this case, the evidence of record shows the FSM was involved in an accidental discharge of a weapon system in Vietnam and later received treatment for this injury. The FSM's service record is void of any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009777

    Original file (20140009777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart to her late father-in-law, a former service member (FSM). A Disposition Form which shows on 5 October 1943 he was admitted to the 93rd Evacuation Hospital for an accidental gun-shot wound to his left thigh while serving in Italy. He was scheduled for transfer to the Walter Reed General Hospital, Washington, DC, for further observation and treatment with a disposition date of 31 January 1944. e. A Clinical Record Brief which shows he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018322

    Original file (20080018322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 September 2008, by letter, the Chief, Military Awards Branch, HRC-Alexandria, VA notified the applicant that after a careful review of the documentation submitted by him, it was determined that the collapse of the bridge was not influenced by enemy action or sabotage and that the report of interment erroneously showed the date of death as 17 April 1951 as a result of a shrapnel wound to the leg, but the evidence suggests that the FSM died on 30 March 1951 as a result of drowning. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102653C070208

    Original file (2004102653C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief of the Military Awards Branch stated that the basic criteria for award of the Purple Heart required that it be awarded to soldiers for wounds or injuries received as a direct result of enemy action. While the statement described what happened on 21 February 1969, the major general does not state that he was present when the aircraft crashed or that he witnessed the aircraft being hit by enemy fire causing it to crash. Notwithstanding the evidence submitted by the applicant, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017278

    Original file (20140017278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no available evidence that indicates the FSM's death resulted from hostile actions perpetrated by an enemy of the United States. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded to any member who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the armed services, has been wounded or killed or who has died or may hereafter die after being wounded: a. in any action against an enemy of the United States; b. in any action with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021321

    Original file (20100021321.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased brother, a former service member (FSM), to show awards of the: * Purple Heart * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * any and all awards as a result of his service in Vietnam 2. The evidence of record shows the FSM was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows the FSM sustained wounds or injuries as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016099

    Original file (20080016099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant, the father of the former service member (FSM), requests his late son be awarded the Purple Heart for injuries he sustained while serving in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. The applicant submitted documents showing the FSM was injured in combat while in a combat zone and was ultimately evacuated from a combat zone for treatment of those injuries; however, these documents do not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010867

    Original file (20070010867.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 1300 (Report of Casualty), dated 17 November 1967, shows that the casualty status was "Non Battle" and that the FSM died on 8 November 1967 in the Republic of Vietnam as a result of injuries sustained while a pilot of military aircraft which crashed into the water. Because there was no definitive determination that the crash was caused by hostile action, and not the result of mechanical failure or other accident, regrettably there is insufficient evidence on which to base award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004386

    Original file (20110004386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The human remains recovered from the crash site were so limited they precluded any determination of the cause of death and the 10 April 2009 Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command J-2 Report does not address the cause of the crash. The only evidence to document the cause of the crash is the statement from Mr. Vek that he shot down the aircraft. His statement is supported by his military award for shooting down a helicopter in the location of and at the time the FSM's aircraft went missing.