Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003359
Original file (20090003359.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	11 August 2009    

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003359 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank/pay grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5. 

2.  The applicant states that he was discharged from active duty prior to receiving his promotion orders. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and promotion orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s records show he was a member of the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG) and he was ordered to active duty on 19 September 2008 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  He was honorably released from active duty and returned to his PAARNG unit on 8 January 2009.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 lists his rank and pay grade in items 4a and 4b as specialist (SPC)/E-4.  Item 12h (effective date of pay grade) shows 25 August 2006.  





3.  The applicant provided a copy of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Military and Veteran Affairs Orders 342-1017, dated 8 December 2008.  These orders show the applicant was promoted to SGT/E-5, effective
8 December 2008.  The statement of "Soldier promoted while deployed" is listed on the orders.  These orders were not contained in the applicant’s military personnel file.

4.  The Integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System and the applicant's Personnel Qualification Record show his rank/pay grade as SGT/E-5 with a date of rank of 8 December 2008.   

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations) provides guidelines for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  Paragraph 2-9 instructs the preparer to enter in items 4a/4b the rank/pay grade in which serving at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The available evidence shows the order promoting the applicant to the rank/pay grade of SGT/E-5 was dated 8 December 2008 and his DD Form 214 was issued on 8 January 2009.  It appears the promotion order was not received early enough to be annotated on the applicant’s DD Form 214.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show his promotion to SGT/E-5 with an effective date of rank of 8 December 2008. 

BOARD VOTE:

_____X___  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION










BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing his rank/pay grade as SGT/E-5 and his date of rank as 8 December 2008.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003359



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003359



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000691

    Original file (20130000691.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He adds that based on the policy memorandum for determining the grade of officers when retiring for physical disability, the promotion packet should have been submitted to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) and he should have been promoted to CW3. The evidence of record shows the applicant was recommended for promotion to CW3 on 1 November 2010 and the earliest date he was eligible for promotion was 13 November 2010. The applicant was not promoted to CW3 by the PAARNG or granted Federal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062705C070421

    Original file (2001062705C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG) on 28 May 1985, in the pay grade of E-1. Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of her DD Form 214 shows the entry “85 05 28” (28 May 1985).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021057

    Original file (20120021057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of items 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The applicant provides: * promotion orders * Certificate of Promotion * leave and earnings statement (LES) * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His promotion orders showing he was promoted to SGT effective 1 September 2012 and his September 2012 LES showing his pay grade as E-5 are accepted as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012124

    Original file (20100012124.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank as staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. These orders directed the applicant's release from active duty in the rank of SGT with an effective date of 11 March 2010. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of SSG/E-6 on 30 September 2009 and this was the rank he held on his date of separation from active duty as evidenced by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015976

    Original file (20100015976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 January 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100015976 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and promotion orders in support of this request. His DD Form 214 rendered for the period 21 June 2005 through 14 January 2008 shows he was honorably discharged due to disability with entitlement to severance pay and contains the following pertinent information: * item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) shows "SGT" * item 4b (Pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020701

    Original file (20110020701.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the DA Form 1059 for the rating period ending 31 July 2007 and orders dated January and June 2008 show his rank as SGT, his records do not contain promotion orders or any other documentation that shows he held this rank at the time of his active duty service from 22 September 2006 to 31 July 2007. In the absence of promotion orders that show he was promoted to the rank of SGT prior to his release from active duty on 31 July 2007, there is insufficient evidence upon which to grant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028858

    Original file (20100028858.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was retired in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. He also provides: * a Certificate of Retirement showing his rank as SPC * a memorandum, dated 2 September 2009, and Retiree Account Statement, dated 29 September 2009, from DFAS showing his rank as SGT * a Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 17 June 2010, showing his DOB as 8 March 1984 and his rank as SGT 13. He states his DOB is 8 March 1984; however, his record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009438

    Original file (20100009438.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show the applicant was promoted to SGT effective 1 October 2005. The applicant's separation orders consistently show his rank as SGT and that he was placed on Retired List in the grade of rank of SGT/E-5. A thorough review of the applicant's military service records shows that his DD Form 214 is the only document that shows the rank/pay grade of SSG/E-6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003115

    Original file (20140003115.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a document titled, "Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel," dated 10 March 2013, that lists his name as a promotable SGT. Finally, the applicant's retirement or release from assignment order should be amended to show he was placed on the retired list in the rank and grade of SSG/E-6. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * promoting him to SSG/E6 effective 28 March 2013...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008727

    Original file (20130008727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 prior to placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). The applicant provides: * DA Form 2339 (Application for Voluntary Retirement) * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) * a memorandum, subject: Grade Determination Request (applicant's name), dated 5 November 2012 * 2 pages of a Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel, as of 5 October 2012 * DD Form 214WS...