Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003156
Original file (20090003156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  		

		BOARD DATE:	  2 June 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003156 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect a more favorable Reentry (RE) Code.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he believes he was assigned the wrong RE Code because he was told that he would be able to reenter the Armed Forces in 2 years.  However, officials at the recruiting station in El Paso, Texas told him that he needs to have the RE Code changed before he can reenter the Armed Forces. 

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 31 October 1980 and enlisted in the Regular Army with a moral waiver in San Antonio, Texas on 2 November 2004 for a period of 3 years and 27 weeks, training as a chemical operations specialist and a cash enlistment bonus.  He completed his training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri and was transferred to Germany on 24 May 2005.

2.  On 9 June 2006, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against the applicant for disobeying a lawful order issued by the battalion commander not to go to an off limits area and for striking another Soldier in the eye.  His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2, a forfeiture of pay (suspended for 6 months), extra duty and restriction.
3.  On 8 March 2007, NJP was imposed against the applicant for the wrongful use of cocaine.  His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-1, a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.

4.  On 27 March 2007, the applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for commission of a serious offense.  He cited the applicant's disciplinary record as the basis for his recommendation and advised the applicant that he was recommending that he be issued a General Discharge.

5.  On 30 March 2007, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for a conditional waiver in which he agreed to waive appearance before an administrative separation board based on him receiving a general discharge.  He also declined the opportunity to submit a statement in his own behalf.

6.  The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge on 11 April 2007 and directed that the applicant be furnished a General Discharge Certificate.

7.  Accordingly, the applicant was discharged under honorable conditions on 20 April 2007, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph     14-2c (2), for misconduct (drug abuse).  He had served 2 years, 5 months and 
19 days of total active service and he was assigned a separation code of "JKK" and an RE Code of "4."

8.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army and the USAR.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 provides that a separation code of “JKK” will be issued to enlisted personnel separated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), due to misconduct.  An RE Code of “4” is issued for a “JKK” separation code.  

10.  An RE code of “4” indicates that a person is not qualified for continued Army service by virtue of being separated from the service with a nonwaivable disqualification such as commission of serious offenses, which includes the abuse of illegal drugs.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2.  The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.

3.  The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation        635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) for misconduct due to abuse of illegal drugs and he was properly assigned a separation code of “JKK” and an RE Code of “4” in accordance with the applicable regulations.

4.  Inasmuch as the applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the RE code issued to him at the time of separation was in error or unjust, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X___   ___X_     DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003156



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003156



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006583

    Original file (20090006583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 30 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c (2), Army Regulation 635-200 with a general discharge (GD), based on the wrongful use of marijuana, a controlled substance. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001433

    Original file (20090001433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 March 2008, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of misconduct – abuse of illegal drugs – and directed the applicant be furnished a general discharge. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009646

    Original file (20120009646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant’s separation proceedings failed to show any evidence or indication that the applicant was led to believe that he would be eligible to reenter the military services within 6 months or any period thereafter. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020011

    Original file (20090020011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 January 2008, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Separations), paragraph 14-12c, for commission of a serious offense (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004222

    Original file (20070004222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of her general discharge on 15 August 2006. The regulation shows that the separation program designator (SPD) "JKK", as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214, is appropriate for discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is "misconduct, commission of a serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs" and the authority for discharge under this SPD is "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2)." The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016441

    Original file (20110016441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states that the SPD code JKK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse). Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant was properly separated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019660

    Original file (20090019660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress, a change to his reentry eligibility (RE) code from RE-4 to a more favorable code that would allow him to reenter military service. The case analyst of record contacted the applicant on three separate occasions on 29 April and on 4 and 5 May 2010 to verify if he wanted an upgrade of his discharge through the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) prior to submitting his request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001108

    Original file (20150001108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 April 2013, the applicant's company commander notified him she intended to initiate separation action under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c(2) (Commission of a serious offense - abuse of illegal drugs), Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations). The applicant provides: a. The applicant requests his RE code be changed from RE-4 to RE-1 so that he can reenter the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001825

    Original file (20120001825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 provides that a separation code of “JKK” will be assigned to enlisted personnel separated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), due to misconduct. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) for misconduct due to abuse of illegal drugs and was properly assigned a separation code of “JKK” and an RE code of “4” in accordance with the applicable regulations. Inasmuch...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018880

    Original file (20080018880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 June 2008, the applicant's commanding officer informed him that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 14 (Separation for misconduct), paragraph 14-12c (Commission of a serious offense). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of "4" is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals separated for this reason. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that...