Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003155
Original file (20090003155.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 July 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003155 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show a 4th award of the Purple Heart and promotion to pay grade E-8.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was not awarded the Purple Heart with 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster (4th award).  He further states, in effect, that an entry in his records showing his status as dropped from the rolls of the Army during the time he was being medically treated for his wound(s) related to the incident for which he is requesting the 4th award of the Purple Heart negatively impacted his military career to include his not initially remaining on active duty and then his not being promoted to pay grade E-8.  

3.  The applicant provides a Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated May 1969, Standard Form 514 (Consultation Sheet), dated 29 September 1969, DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), and a photocopy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) in support of this application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 June 1962.  He was awarded the military occupational specialty of light weapons infantryman.  The applicant continued to serve on active duty through subsequent reenlistments until he was discharged due to expiration term of service on 31 July 1970.  The highest rank he attained during this period of active duty was staff sergeant.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 January 1978, was promoted to sergeant first class, and continued to serve on active duty through subsequent reenlistments until he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired) on 31 August 1991 for length of service and placed on the Retired List on 1 September 1991.  He completed 21 years, 9 months, and 15 days of creditable active service.

4.  The applicant's records contain Headquarters, 24th Evacuation Hospital, General Orders Number 61, dated 15 March 1969, showing award of the Purple Heart with the 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster, i.e. 4th award.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 
31 August 1991 shows four awards of the Purple Heart.  Therefore, this portion of his request will not be further discussed. 

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) contains an entry showing he was dropped from the rolls, which was then lined through.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he did not initially remain on active duty because of the negative impact from being carried in a dropped from the rolls of the Army status while he was being treated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center for wounds incurred from hostile action in Vietnam in March 1969.  However, the applicant has not submitted any evidence to support this contention.

2.  The applicant's contention that his being carried in a dropped from the rolls of the Army status had a negative effect on his getting promoted to master sergeant is speculative.  The applicant has not submitted any evidence to support this contention.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board must make a presumption of regularity.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.  To grant the applicant's request would be giving him a benefit not afforded to other Soldiers.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X__  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003155



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003155



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001958C070208

    Original file (20040001958C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart, Army Good Conduct Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm. The applicant is requesting that his 11 August 1969 DD Form 214 be corrected in that awards that he is entitled to are not reflected on that form; however, the applicant’s military service continued after that date, and he was placed on the temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004109C070208

    Original file (20040004109C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the spelling of his last name be corrected on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge), and that his DD Form 214 show award of the Purple Heart (first oak leaf cluster). His record should reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars (one for each campaign). The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004110C070206

    Original file (20050004110C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with 1 bronze service star, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Army Commendation Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), and the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no general orders in the applicant’s service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005197C070206

    Original file (20050005197C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Purple Heart with Third Oak Leaf Cluster, a second award of the Bronze Star Medal, and the Army Commendation Medal. Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division General Orders Number 724, dated 22 January 1970, show the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 January 1968 to date of separation on or about 12 January 1970. Records show the applicant should have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019290

    Original file (20080019290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General orders show the applicant was awarded three awards of the Air Medal. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 April 1968 through 28 November 1969; b. amending his DD Form 214 to add the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (Second Oak Leaf...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105444C070208

    Original file (2004105444C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 June 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004105444 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant provides a self authored statement, dated 21 February 2004; an DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 30 April 1969; a photograph of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071025C070402

    Original file (2002071025C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, the Board concludes that the applicant was wounded under qualifying conditions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089116C070403

    Original file (2003089116C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction for his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Purple Heart, a second award of the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device and to show he received a Certificate of Achievement for Vietnam service. The applicant’s military records contain...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005438

    Original file (20120005438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect all awards and decorations earned, including the: * Bronze Star Medal with 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster with "V" Device * Army Commendation Medal with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster with "V" Device * Purple Heart with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster * Combat Infantryman Badge 2. He should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 14 March 1968 to 22 February 1970...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017274

    Original file (20090017274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he wounded as a result of hostile action on 16 July 1968 in Vietnam and was awarded the Purple Heart. Despite the lack of general orders awarding the applicant the Purple Heart with first oak leaf cluster, the evidence shows he is qualified for award of the Purple Heart with first oak leaf cluster for wounds received as a result of hostile action on 30 January 1969 as verified by the Vietnam casualty roster. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...