RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        29 September 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050004110


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Michael J. Fowler             |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Lester Echols                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Paul M. Smith                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Leonard G. Hassell            |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the
Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his award of the Purple Heart was
not added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of
Transfer or Discharge).

3.  The applicant provides a Purple Heart certificate, dated 30 July 1971.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 23 December 1971.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 10 March 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant enlisted into the Regular Army on 16 June 1969 and
successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training.  He
was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 71B (Clerk Typist).  He
was later awarded MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

4.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to Headquarters and
Headquarters Company, 4th Battalion, 9th Infantry on or about 25 August
1970.  He was reassigned to E Company, 4th Battalion, 9th Infantry on or
about 3 September 1970.  He was reassigned to Headquarters and Headquarters
Company, 4th Battalion, 3rd Infantry on or about 21 November 1970.  He was
reassigned to E Company, 4th Battalion, 3rd Infantry on or about 3 December
1970.

5.  The applicant's name appears on the Vietnam Casualty Roster for
receiving wounds by hostile forces on 27 July 1971.


6.  Headquarters, 23rd Infantry Division General Orders 00969, dated 25
January 1971, show that the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation
Medal for meritorious achievement during the period 1 September 1970
through 31 December 1970.

7.  Headquarters, 23rd Infantry Division General Orders 6749, dated 15 June
1971, show that the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with
"V" Device (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) for heroism on 16 February 1971.

8.  The applicant departed Vietnam on or about 30 July 1971 after being
credited with participating in two campaigns.  On 23 December 1971, the
applicant was honorably separated in the rank of Sergeant/E-5 after
completing 2 years,
6 months, and 19 days of creditable active service.

9.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense
Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with 1 bronze service star, the
Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Army
Commendation Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), and the Combat Infantryman
Badge.

10.  There are no general orders in the applicant’s service personnel
records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

11.  The applicant provides a Purple Heart certificate, dated 30 July 1971,
that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on
27 July 1971.

12.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the
Army Good Conduct Medal.  His records do not contain any adverse
information and his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows his
conduct and efficiency ratings as "excellent" throughout his period of
service.

13.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign
Participation Credit Register) shows that, at the time of the applicant’s
assignment to the 4th Battalion, 3rd Infantry, it was cited for award of
the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the
period 8 February 1971 through 29 July 1971 based on Headquarters,
Department of the Army General Orders Number 42, dated 1972.

14.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time,
provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations.
It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of
continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after
27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service
on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  At the
time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as
"excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service.

15.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent
part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the
wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required
treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.  This regulation also provides that there is no statute of
limitations on a request for award of the Purple Heart.

16.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of a
bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed
in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service
stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which
show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.  However, his name appears on
the Vietnam Casualty Roster and he also provided a Purple Heart award
certificate.  The Purple Heart certificate is accepted as sufficient
evidence to show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  It appears the applicant has met the regulatory requirements for award
of the Army Good Conduct Medal for a qualifying period from 16 June 1969
through 23 December 1971.

3.  Evidence of record confirms that the applicant was awarded the Army
Commendation Medal with "V" Device (1st Oak Leaf Cluster).  This award
should be added to his DD Form 214.

4.  The applicant was assigned to a unit during a period of time the unit
was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with/Palm Unit
Citation.  His participation in two campaigns entitles him to two bronze
service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal.  These awards should
be added to his DD Form 214.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 23 December 1971.  Therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 22 December 1974.  Although the applicant did not file
within the ABCMR's statute of limitations, it is appropriate to waive
failure to timely file in this case based on the fact there is no statute
of limitations on requests for award of the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

__LE____  __ PMS _  __ LGH _  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected:

      a.  by deleting the entry Army Commendation Medal (1st Oak Leaf
Cluster) from the applicant's DD Form 214;

      b.  by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the
period 16 June 1969 through 23 December 1971; and

      c.  by amending his DD Form 214 to show award of the Purple Heart,
the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device
(1st Oak Leaf Cluster), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm
Unit Citation, and two bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam
Service Medal.




                            ____ Lester Echols _____
                                      CHAIRPERSON


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050004110                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |29 September 2005                       |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0014.0000                           |
|2.                      |107.0015.0000                           |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]