Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002815
Original file (20090002815.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        27 MAY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090002815 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the reentry (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from RE-4.

2.  The applicant states he is unable to enlist because of his RE code.  He states he was told his narrative reason for separation would permit him to enlist after
2 years.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant entered the Regular Army (RA) on 15 May 2003 on a 4-year enlistment.  Trained as a Combat Engineer in military occupational specialty (MOS) 21B, he completed the Basic Airborne Course and was assigned to the 37th Combat Engineer Group (Airborne), Fort Bragg, NC.

2.  On 4 August 2005, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for wrongfully using marijuana on or between 8 June 2005 and 8 July 2005.

3.  The applicant’s commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) for misconduct -
commission of a serious offense (positive urinalysis for marijuana on 8 July 2005).  The commander recommended a general discharge.
4.  On 3 October 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the nature and impact of the proposed discharge action.  He elected to submit a statement in his own behalf in which he apologized and asked for a second chance.

5.  The discharge request was processed through the applicant’s chain of command to the approving authority.  On an unknown date, the approving authority approved the applicant’s discharge and directed he be issued a general discharge.

6.  On 18 November 2005, the applicant was separated with a general discharge under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs.  He was issued a separation program designator (SPD) code of “JKK” and an RE code of RE-4.

7.  On 29 August 2006, the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) seeking a change in characterization and reason for discharge.  On 20 September 2007, the ADRB denied his request.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 14-12c contains the policy for the separation of personnel for the commission of a serious military or civil offense, if the specific circumstances of the offense warrant separation and a punitive discharge is, or would be, authorized for the same or a closely related offense under the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM).  Abuse of illegal drugs is classified as serious misconduct.

9.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes the basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.  RE 1 and 2 permit immediate reenlistment if all other criteria are met.  RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.  An RE code of 4 indicates separation from the last period of service with a disqualification which cannot be waived and ineligibility for enlistment.

10.  The SPD Codes/RE Code Cross Reference Table states that when the SPD code is “JKK” then an RE code of “4” will be given.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant wants his RE code changed.
2.  The applicant tested positive for marijuana use during an 8 July 2005 random urinalysis.  He was processed for separation.  During the separation process, the process and his rights were explained to him.  He therefore knew, or should have known he would receive an RE-4 and that he would be ineligible to reenter the service again.  He provides no evidence to show he was told he could reenlist after 2 years.

3.  The applicant’s discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations.  The RE code he was assigned is in accordance with the narrative reason and authority for his separation.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________XXX________________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002815



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002815


3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003125

    Original file (20130003125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previously-denied request to upgrade his general under honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge and to change his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code to a more favorable code. On 24 May 2006, the applicant was discharged accordingly. His SPD and RE codes were assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, due to misconduct – drug abuse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080008120

    Original file (AR20080008120.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He also asks that his 2007 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect his combat and other service awards as well as his complete military training. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designated Codes), Table 2-3, states that the SPD code of JKK denotes involuntary discharge by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003146

    Original file (20090003146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander advised the applicant of his right to consult with counsel, submit statements in his own behalf, obtain copies of documents that would be sent to the separation authority supporting the proposed separation, to waive any of these rights, and to withdraw any waiver of rights at any time prior to the date the discharge authority directs or approves his separation. On 27 January 2005, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002326

    Original file (20090002326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his RE (Reentry) Code be changed to permit him to return to military service. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant enlisted and entered active duty as a Regular Army Soldier on 2 October 2002. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designated Codes), Table 2-3, states that the SPD code of JKK denotes involuntary discharge by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003920

    Original file (AR20130003920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 December 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. He received a negative counseling statement dated 9 November 2005, for a positive urinalysis. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007125

    Original file (20080007125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the record of his Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) hearing and associated documents in support of his application. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of Paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs) based on his multiple incidents of illegal use of marijuana and cocaine. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001974

    Original file (20080001974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 September 2006, the applicant was informed that he was being processed for separation under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 for misconduct (drug abuse). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. A separation code of "JKK" applies to persons who are separated under the provisions of chapter 14, Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011602

    Original file (20060011602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On that same day, the applicant's commander recommended that he be separated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct-commission of a serious offence, prior to his ETS date. The applicant's separation code of "JKK" is consistent with the basis for his separation and the RE Code applied to his DD Form 214 is consistent with the separation code; therefore, the applicant is not entitled to a change of his separation code or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008819

    Original file (20100008819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 April 1985, the separation authority waived counseling and rehabilitative requirements and directed the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct - drug abuse, with issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code of "JKK" (as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214) is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012945

    Original file (20120012945.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)) Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states SPD code JKK is the...