IN THE CASE OF:  	Mr. 

      BOARD DATE:  	10 July 2013

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20130003920
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.




      
      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable.

2.  He states, in effect, he desires to receive VA benefits he deserves for serving his country.  He has been a productive member of society and he had no legal or drug problems since his discharge.  

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:		21 February 2013
b. Discharge Received:		General, Under Honorable Conditions
c. Date of Discharge:			27 December 2005
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE:		Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200 							Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4
e. Unit of assignment:			A Co, 44th Engineer Battalion, Fort Carson, CO
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:	7 April 2005, 4 years
g. Current Enlistment Service:	8 months, 21 days 
h. Total Service:			2 years, 8 month, 25 days
i. Lost time:				None
j. Previous Discharges:		RA-(030403-050406)/HD
k. Highest Grade Achieved:		E-4
l. Military Occupational Specialty:	21B10, Combat Engineer
m. GT Score:				118
n. Education:				GED Certificate
o. Overseas Service:			Korea/Southwest Asia
p. Combat Service:			Kuwait/Iraq (040820-050801)
q. Decorations/Awards:		PH, NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, KDSM, ASR
      CAB
r. Administrative Separation Board: 	No
s. Performance Ratings:		No
t. Counseling Statements:		Yes
u. Prior Board Review:			No

SUMMARY OF SERVICE:		

The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 April 2003, for a period of 3 years.  He was 22 years old at the time of entry with a GED Certificate.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 21B10, Combat Engineer.  He reenlisted on     7 April 2005, for a period of 4 years and he was 24 years old at the time.  His record also shows he served a combat tour and earned several awards including a PH and CAB.  He was serving at Fort Carson, CA, when his discharge was initiated.  He achieved the rank of 
SPC/E-4.  


SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES:

1.  The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates on 1 December 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for testing positive for amphetamines, methamphetamines, marijuana and ecstacy. 

2.  Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights.

3.  On 2 December 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement on his behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  

4.  On 12 December 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

5.  The applicant’s record of service does not contain any documented evidence of unauthorized absences or lost time.

6.  The applicant was discharged from the Army on 27 December 2005, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct (drug abuse), a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKK and a RE code of 4. 

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD:

1.  An Article 15, dated 15 November 2005 for wrongfully using amphetamines, methamphetamines and marijuana; the punishment consisted of reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $617 pay x 2 months, extra duty for 45 days and restriction for 45 days, (FG).

2.  The record of evidence contains a positive urinalysis report coded IU, dated 17 October 2005.

3.  He received a negative counseling statement dated 9 November 2005, for a positive urinalysis.

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: 

The applicant provided a DD Form 293; a DD Form 214; and Discharge Orders 348-0006.


POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

The applicant did not provide any with the application.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY:

1.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

2.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.

3.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered.  However, after examining his military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  

2.  The record confirms the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  It brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting an honorable discharge.  The applicant’s record of service was marred by an Article 15 and a positive urinalysis report.

3.  The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that his service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  

4.  The applicant contends he has been a productive member of society and he had no legal or drug problems since his discharge.  The applicant is to be commended for his efforts.  However, this contention is not a matter upon which the Army Discharge Review Board grants a change in discharge because it raises no matter of fact, law, procedure, or discretion related to the discharge process, nor is it associated with the discharge at the time it was issued.  

5.  The applicant desires to receive VA benefits he deserves for serving his country.  However, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.

6.  Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service being both proper and equitable, recommend the Board deny relief. 

SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing:  Records Review       Date:  10 July 2013        Location:  Washington, DC
          
Did the Applicant Testify:  NA

Counsel:  None

Witnesses/Observers: NA

Board Vote:
Character Change:  0	No Change:  5
Reason Change:	0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:		No
Change Characterization to:	No Change
Change Reason to:			No Change
Change Authority for Separation:	NA
Change RE Code to:		NA
Grade Restoration to:		NA
Other:					NA

Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTHC - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable Conditions


ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR20130003920



Page 5 of 5 pages


ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1