Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002710
Original file (20090002710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 June 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090002710 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 18a (Net Active Service This Period) and Item 18c (Total Active Service) of her DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that she needs her DD Form 214 corrected to show she completed 180 "hours" of active duty service to qualify for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) programs.  She states that she served on active duty from 9 April to 1 August 1979 which is more than 180 hours.  She further states that she can provide her leave and earnings statements for February 1979 through March 1984, if required. 

3.  In support of her application, the applicant provides copies of her active duty for training (ADT) orders, DD Form 214, NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service), and her United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) discharge orders.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that she enlisted in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG), in pay grade E-1, on 14 February 1979, for 6 years.  On 9 March 1979, she was issued orders ordering her to ADT for completion of military occupational specialty training (MOS).  She entered on active duty on 8 April 1979.  Her orders stated that she was to begin basic training on 13 April 1979 and advanced individual training (AIT) on 1 June 1979.  She completed her training and she was awarded MOS 76P, Stock Control Supplyman, on 29 June 1979.

3.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 1 August 1979 and reverted back to the PAARNG.  She was issued a DD Form 214 that shows in Item 18a she was credited with completing 3 months and 24 days of net active service.  Item 18c also shows she was credited with completing 3 months and 
24 day of total active service, a period of 2,760 hours (not including the end date 1 August 1979).

4.  The applicant submits a copy of her NGB Form 22 that shows she was discharged from the PAARNG on 20 May 1984.  Her NGB Form 22 also shows she was on ADT from 8 April 1979 to 1 August 1979.  She also submits her USAR orders showing she was discharged on 13 March 1985.  

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 would be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from the active Army.  A DD Form 214 would also be prepared for all personnel of the USAR and the ARNG released after completion of 90 days or more of active duty for training or full-time training duty. The total amount of active service time from the date of entry to the date of release would be entered in Items 18a and 18c of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is not entitled to correction of Items 18a and 18c of her DD Form 214.  



2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant entered on ADT on 8 April 1979.  She completed her training, was awarded a MOS, and was released from active duty on 1 August 1979.  She was issued a DD Form 214 that properly shows a credit of 3 months and 24 days net active service, a period of 2,760 hours (not including the end date of 1 August 1979).  

3.  There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, which would indicate that her DD Form 214 is in error or unjust.  Therefore, she is not entitled to a correction of her DD Form 214.

4.  The applicant might be confusing "hours" of active duty with "days" of active duty.  The VA requires the completion of 180 days of active duty to determine eligibility for many of its benefits.  However, even if this is the case, there is no error on the applicant's DD Form 214.  The available evidence shows she completed only 3 months and 24 days of active duty (i.e., 116 days).

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002710



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002710



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006740

    Original file (20120006740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Although the applicant remained a member of the ARARNG until 9 March 1981 and a member of the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) until 21 September 1984, his record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011673

    Original file (20120011673.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military record shows he enlisted in the Maryland ARNG (MDARNG), in pay grade E-1, on 10 January 1976, for 6 years. The evidence of record also shows the information entered in Items 18a through f are the correction computations of his period of ARNG service from 10 January through 13 March 1976 and AD service from 14 March through 18 June 1976. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correction to the following on this DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003169

    Original file (20130003169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) with an effective date of 10 September 1979 be corrected to show his correct dates of active service. The applicant provides his: * DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 September 1979 * General Discharge Certificate, dated 10 September 1979 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 9d (Effective Date) contains the entry "75 04 28" or 28 April 1975. c. Item 18a (Net Active Service This Period) contains the entry "0...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010976.

    Original file (20090010976..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 9d (Effective Date) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). Item 9d on the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "79 08 17" [17 August 1979]. Evidence of record shows the applicant was ordered to active duty on 10 August 1979.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022061

    Original file (20100022061.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 March 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022061 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides three DD Forms 214. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 February 1979 to show the date entered active duty this period as 1 March 1977.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011596

    Original file (20090011596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that this DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 26 October 1979 and his subsequent DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 19 April 1986 shows he entered active duty on 27 September 1979. The applicant's service personnel records contain a Certification of Military Service issued on 15 November 2001 which shows he was a member of the Regular Army from 1 December 1976 to 26 September 1979 and that he was honorably discharged for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025724

    Original file (20100025724.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. On 29 March 1978, RCPAC issued an AGUZ Form 115 documenting the applicant's retirement points for the period 6 January 1977 through 5 January 1978 and it shows he served on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023025

    Original file (20100023025.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 February 1991 to show: * the actual amount of time he served * he served during Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm * he completed airborne training in August 1985 * all authorized awards 2. c. The regulation states for item 14 (Military Education) to list formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010844

    Original file (20100010844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 5 January 1979 to show his entry date as 1 June 1974. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the OKARNG for a period of 6 years on 25 July 1975. The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of active service shows the following entries: * item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty (AD) This Period) shows "77 07 21" * item 9d (Effective Date (of Separation This Period) shows "79...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020291

    Original file (20120020291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided evidence to show that her DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 February 1979 is in error. The applicant's active duty service and prior inactive service appear to be correct on her DD Form 214 for the period end 31 May 1997.