Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002418
Original file (20090002418.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	         2 JUNE 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090002418 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) be corrected to show his first name as "J----" instead of "M-----." 

2.  The applicant states that he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal for his service in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  However, the recommending official entered his father's first name instead of his on the DA Form 638 which was prepared in a hurry as his unit was trying to process multiple awards in a limited amount of time.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 21 December 2005; a copy of his Enlisted Record Brief, dated 1 January 2009; a copy of Orders 04-261-00067, issued by the 89th Regional Readiness Command, Wichita, KS, on 17 September 2004; and a copy of the DA Form 638, dated 26 August 2005, in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 

provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 14 December 2002.  Item 1 (Name-Last, First, Middle) of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows his first name as "J----."  He authenticated this form by placing his signature in the appropriate block using his first name as "J----."  

3.  The applicant’s records further show he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom on 26 September 2004 and subsequently served in Iraq from 12 December 2004 to 19 December 2005.  He was honorably released from active duty to the control of his USAR unit on 21 December 2005.  Item 1 (Name-Last, First, Middle) of his DD Form 214 shows his first name as "J----." He authenticated this form using his first name as "J----." 

4.  On 26 August 2005, the applicant’s squad leader recommended him for award of the Army Achievement Medal.  He listed his first name as "M-----."    The award was approved by his battalion commander on the same date.  His battalion adjutant assigned Permanent Orders Number 239-30 on 27 August 2005 and placed his signature in the appropriate block.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military decorations, Good Conduct Medal, service medals and ribbons, combat and special skill badges and tabs, unit decorations, and trophies.  It states in pertinent part that the DA Form 638 will be used to initiate, process, and approve award recommendations of all U.S. Army individual decorations, to include valor and heroism decorations.  The recommender will, to the extent possible, verify data on the DA Form 638 concerning the awardee from official Army personnel documents.  Typing the recommendation is not required.  Recommendations may be handwritten or hand-printed, but must be clearly legible.  Use only black ink for machine readability (copier, fax, or microfiche).  For historical purposes, both the DA Form 638 indicating disapproval/downgrading and the certificate for the approved award should be forwarded for filing in the OMPF.  Commanders are authorized to correct minor errors (incorrect spelling of names, initials, social security numbers, erroneously numbered oak leaf clusters, and so forth) appearing on awards orders published by other commanders by issuing an amendment to the orders.  Amendment of orders will be prepared according to Army Regulation 600-8-105 (Military Orders), paragraph 2–23.  When an error cannot be corrected by an amendment to the orders, it will be returned to the command which issued the erroneous order or, in the event that the command no longer exists, to Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command for corrective action.  Award orders issued/announced on the DA Form 638 will be amended or revoked using separate permanent orders in accordance with applicable regulations.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant was recommended for an award of the Army Achievement Medal.  The recommending official erroneously listed an incorrect first name on the DA Form 638.  The applicant is therefore entitled to correction of this form to show his correct first name.  

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Permanent Orders Number 239-30 of the applicant's DA Form 638, dated 27 August 2005, to reflect his correct first name as J---- vice M-----.



      _______XXX_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002418



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002418



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018266

    Original file (20080018266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submitted a copy of a DA Form 638 and certificate, dated 22 June 2005, that show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service in assigned duties during hostilities in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom from 9 August 2004 to 30 September 2005. Although the applicant's period of service in Iraq appears to be inconsistent with his pay records at DFAS, the applicant submitted sufficient documents in the form of a certificate showing award of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009522

    Original file (20090009522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his deployments and awards are not listed on his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that individuals authorized the Afghanistan Campaign Medal must have served in direct support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF). DFAS records, orders for the applicant's unit, and his orders for the award of the Joint Service Achievement Medal are sufficient evidence to conclude he was deployed to Afghanistan from 23 May 2003 - 8 September 2003 (20030523 -...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002757

    Original file (20130002757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the Air Medal (2nd Award) * award of the Aviation Badge * all training and courses she completed 2. * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of her DD Form 214 does not show award of the Air Medal or Air Medal (2nd Award) * item 14 (Military Education) of her DD Form 214 does not show completion of the Primary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012165

    Original file (20090012165.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his previous request for award of the Bronze Star Medal. b. a second email Subject: Text Correction from C-----r, dated 16 February 2006, instructs Sergeant S-----s to change the wording of the text on the applicant's DA Form 638 to 200 missions; and c. the certificate for award of the Bronze Star Medal for CPT J----e B-----e which shows, in pertinent part, that CPT J----e B-----e was "awarded the Bronze Star Medal for exceptionally...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012277

    Original file (20080012277.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected by adding the awards of the Bronze Star Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, Combat Action Badge, and Meritorious Unit Commendation to his separation document (DD Form 214) and military file. The Certificate of Award and DA Form 638 with Permanent Orders C285-04, dated 12 October 2006, issued by Headquarters, United States Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command (Airborne), Fort Bragg shows that the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002188

    Original file (20110002188.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * her orders to deploy in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) * a letter, dated 18 July 2008, from Medical Task Force 66, Baghdad, Iraq * two DA Forms 638 (Recommendation for Awards) with attached documents CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of her DD Form 214 shows she was awarded or is authorized the: * Meritorious Service Medal * Army Commendation Medal (5th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009689

    Original file (20120009689.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation and the Iraq Campaign Medal. Units based in the continental United States are excluded from this award, as are other units outside the area of operations. The Joint Meritorious Unit Award may not be awarded to any Department of Defense activity which has received any other unit award for the same achievement or period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025521

    Original file (20100025521.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states service members qualified for the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal by reason of service between 19 March 2003 and 28 February 2005, in an area for which the Iraq Campaign Medal was subsequently authorized, will remain qualified for that medal. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013733

    Original file (20140013733.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides the following as evidence in support of his request: * a memorandum from Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, Texas to Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), subject: Approval of CAB for 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division * a memorandum from Headquarters, 3rd Grey Wolf Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, Texas, dated 28 September 2005,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017989

    Original file (20080017989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A recommendation for the approval of the award was made by the unit commander and the battalion commander approved the recommendation. One indicator, according to the applicant, was his having been submitted for an Army Achievement Medal as an end of tour award while all other officers in the unit were put in for a Bronze Star Medal, including the commander. It is noted that both the battalion and the brigade commanders recommended to the award approval authority that the Army Commendation...