Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002054
Original file (20090002054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:		  19 May 2009 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090002054 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he received combat wounds to his leg and arm during the TET Counteroffensive campaign on 31 January 1968 and that he was hospitalized.  

3.  The applicant provides a Standard Form (SF) 502 (Clinical Record – Narrative Summary), dated 8 March 1968; and page 6 of a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Rating Decision in support of his application.   

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 22 September 1966.  He served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 31M (radio relay and carrier attendant) in Vietnam from 27 March 1967 through 26 March 1968.  He was subsequently released from active duty on
20 September 1968 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

4.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

6.  In support of his claim, the applicant provided a clinical record, dated 8 March 1968, which shows he was treated for "infected wounds, left pre-tibial area." However, there is no evidence that these wounds were the result of hostile action.

7.  The applicant also provided page 6 of a DVA Rating Decision which states, in pertinent part, that he was granted service-connection for scars, residuals of an injury to his left lower leg.  This page states that in November 2006 the applicant reported that he injured his left leg during a jump from a tower in Vietnam after receiving incoming fire.  This page also states that in February 2007 the applicant reported that he suffered a leg wound from falling 25 feet from a radio tower during the TET offensive, that he reported running down the radio tower as fast as he could cutting his leg in the process, that his wounds became infected, and that he was treated in a hospital and then went on convalescent leave.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions that he received combat wounds to his leg and arm during the TET Counteroffensive campaign on 31 January 1968 and that he was hospitalized were carefully considered.

2.  There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the available records.    Contemporaneous medical evidence of record shows the applicant was treated for infected wounds of his left leg in Vietnam more than a month after the incident.  However, there is no evidence which shows these wounds were the result of hostile action in Vietnam.  The DVA documentation provided by the applicant states that in 2006 he reported that he injured his left leg during a jump from a tower after receiving incoming fire.  In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the documentation provided by the applicant is not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002054



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002054



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103474C070208

    Original file (2004103474C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a 1-page medical record from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) dated 15 January 2004; a 1-page medical record from the DVA dated 21 January 2000; a 1-page medical record from the DVA dated 24 April 2003; an extract from his service medical records; a 3-page attachment to a DVA claim; a letter dated 6 March 1969; a letter addressed to the National Archives and Records Administration dated 26 October 1999; and his DD Form 214. In pertinent part, it states that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013482

    Original file (20110013482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show he was wounded in action in Vietnam. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart. In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish the wound for which the award is being made required treatment by medical personnel and the medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003702C070206

    Original file (20050003702C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 October 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050003702 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021588

    Original file (20140021588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He should be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 31 January 1968, at the beginning of the TET Offensive [Republic of Vietnam], which were not reported. c. He was wounded during the attack when he was pushed to the cement sidewalk while running to his assigned bunker and sustained injuries to his right leg, including deep lacerations, blood loss, and bruising. His DD Form 214 shows he was credited with the completion of 3 years, 10 months, and 20 days of total active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106650C070208

    Original file (2004106650C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Purple Heart. However, there are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart, and there is no evidence in his records that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action. In the absence of military records, which show the applicant was wounded or injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070823C070402

    Original file (2002070823C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that, on or about 29 March 1969, he was injured in a rocket attack while serving in Vietnam, but was not awarded the Purple Heart. In support of his application, the applicant submitted a 9 October 2001 statement from a former fellow soldier with whom he served in Vietnam; a copy of orders showing that this fellow soldier was assigned to the 520th Personnel Service Company; a 5 October 2001 statement from a second former soldier who states the he worked on the same...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003778

    Original file (20090003778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating decision states the applicant had been treated for a wound he sustained to his left knee in February 1969. The applicant was wounded a second time in the left knee, in February 1969. While the evidence shows he received treatment by medical personnel for a wound that he sustained to his left knee, there is no evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004887C070208

    Original file (20040004887C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submitted a copy of medical records from the DVA which shows that he was granted a service connected rating of 0 percent for residuals of shrapnel injury to the left anterior thigh effective 10 April 2003. The applicant is entitled to the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 14 March 1968 to 18 December 1969 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026430

    Original file (20100026430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No combat injuries or wounds are recorded on his medical records; however, an entry "scar to left leg" was entered on his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination). In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 is not available for review, his service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his record is void of any official Army telegrams or Western Union telegrams, and there is no conclusive evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012962

    Original file (20070012962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...