Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003702C070206
Original file (20050003702C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:          18 October 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050003702


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John Slone                    |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Linda Simmons                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Kenneth Lapin                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier request for award
of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, his previous request for award of the
Purple Heart was denied based on the fact that there were no military
records stating that he was wounded.  He also points out that Army Board
for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR2004106706
states he was awarded 10 percent disability from the Department of Veterans
Affairs (DVA) for residuals, shell fragment wounds to the right leg, but he
did not submit any support of that award.

3.  The applicant provides an undated eyewitness statement from his company
commander at the time in question and page one of a DVA Rating Decision,
dated 19 October 2004.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were
summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the
ABCMR in Docket Number AR2004106706, on 1 February 2005.

2.  The applicant provides an undated eyewitness statement from his company
commander at the time in question.  He attests that he was Bravo Company
commander of the 1st Battalion, 2nd Infantry of the 1st Infantry Division
and that the applicant served with him from February to October 1969 as his
radio telephone operator.  He attests that the applicant's job placed him
in constant harms way, that he was exposed to enemy small arms fire,
artillery fire, land mines and booby traps, and that he was wounded.

3.  The applicant also provided page one of a DVA Rating Decision, dated
19 October 2004, which shows he was granted service connected disability
compensation (10 percent) for residuals, shell fragment wounds to right leg
with retained foreign bodies.  This page does not indicate what records
were considered by the DVA.

4.  The applicant's submissions are new evidence which will be considered
by the Board.

5.  The applicant was inducted on 13 June 1968.  He was awarded military
occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (light weapons infantryman) and served in
this MOS in Vietnam from 5 December 1968 through 15 January 1970.   On
15 January 1970, the applicant was released from active duty.

6.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the
applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of
hostile action in Vietnam.

7.  On 15 January 1970, the applicant underwent a separation physical
examination which makes no mention of any injuries or wounds sustained as a
result of hostile action in Vietnam.  There are no other service medical
records available.

8.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part,
that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that
the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required
treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the
applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the
applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action
in Vietnam, the statement from the applicant's company commander at the
time in question and the DVA Rating Decision are not sufficient as a basis
for an award of the Purple Heart.  Regrettably, there is insufficient
evidence on which to base an award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

JS______  _LS_____  _KL____  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of
the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR2004106706, dated 1 February 2005.




            ___John Slone_________
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050003702                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |20050201                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051018                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011917

    Original file (20080011917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence of record which verifies his injuries were a result of hostile action in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in July 1969 and showing this award on his DD Form 214. ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017519

    Original file (20080017519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statement provided by the applicant is not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017793

    Original file (20130017793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served in Vietnam from 8 June 1969 to 11 January 1970. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for those wounds/injuries, and his treatment was made a matter of record, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012969

    Original file (20110012969.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart. On 12 March 2002, the applicant submitted a DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) to the ABCMR requesting award of the Purple Heart. The medical records the applicant provides show he was initially seen by medical personnel on 21 November 1969 for a foreign body in the lower third of his left leg.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064741C070421

    Original file (2001064741C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel also noted that the DVA rating decision granted service connection for shrapnel wounds to his shoulder and that the wounds are consistent with his history of being wounded in Vietnam. The rating decision states that the applicant’s service medical records were reviewed when his claim was considered and denied in 1989. The Board noted that the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the Good Conduct Medal or any unit awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021322

    Original file (20090021322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided his Hearing Officer's Decision, dated 20 May 1996, that shows the VA granted him service connection for residuals, shell fragment wound of the left thigh. The fact that the applicant provided documentation from VA granting him service connection for residuals, shell fragment wound of the left thigh is not sufficient evidence to conclude that he is entitled to the award of the Purple Heart. There is no medical evidence available that shows the applicant was wounded or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024144

    Original file (20110024144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a statement from his spouse and a VA rating decision as new evidence that will be considered by the Board. d. Reasonable doubt was resolved in favor of the applicant and it was determined he suffered shell fragment wounds to the left leg during combat in World War II that have resulted in the three tender scars of the left lower leg shown by objective findings during his latest VA examination. The available evidence shows the VA granted the applicant service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071920C070403

    Original file (2002071920C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in Vietnam in 1971. He states that the applicant received medical treatment by the medic on duty in the camp, and that the applicant did not want to be admitted to the hospital, but instead chose to remain with the unit. The Board considered the eyewitness statements provided in support of the applicant’s claim for award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014361

    Original file (20090014361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for wounds he received in the Republic of Vietnam. There are no orders in the applicant's military service records awarding him the Purple Heart. In the absence of military records which show that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds resulting from hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018346

    Original file (20080018346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Good Conduct Medal. Evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result...