Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 1997009264
Original file (1997009264.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 20 May 1999
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR1997009264


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Loren G. Harrell Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Ernest M. Willcher Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr., Member
Ms. Margaret V. Thompson Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected “former spouse” coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

3. The applicant states that the divorce decree ordered the FSM to leave her as the SBP beneficiary. He did not keep paying premiums because he was court-ordered to do so; he did it because he wanted her to have this income.

4. The FSM’s military records show that he entered the Army on 13 June 1949. He and the applicant married on 16 July 1966. He retired, in pay grade E-6, on 1 August 1969.

5. In 1974, the FSM elected SBP, “spouse only” coverage during one of the Open Enrollment periods.

6. On 10 September 1991, the FSM and the applicant divorced. The divorce decree states in part that the applicant “shall be entitled to the Plaintiff’s military survivor’s benefit.”

7. The FSM died on 6 August 1998. The applicant applied for SBP benefits and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Denver (DFAS-DE) denied her request because a deemed election had not been made within one year of the date of divorce.

8. Public Law 92-245, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. It declared a 12-month Open Season for those members who retired prior to enactment of the law.

9. Public Law 93-155, enacted 16 November 1973, extended that Open Season from 12 to 18 months (21 September 1972 – 20 March 1974).

10. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act, dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses.

11. Public Law 99-145, dated 8 November 1985, permitted retirees to elect SBP coverage for a former spouse under spouse coverage provisions vice insurable interest provisions.

12. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

13. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(2) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election. If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The FSM failed to comply with the letter of the law by making a written request to change his SBP coverage from “spouse only” to “former spouse” and the applicant failed to make a written request for a deemed election within one year of the date of divorce. However, the Board concludes that it was the FSM’s intent to provide SBP “former spouse” coverage for the applicant as he continued to pay SBP costs until his death.

2. In view of the foregoing, it would be in the interest of justice to correct the FSM’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM concerned changed his SBP “spouse” coverage to “former spouse” coverage on 10 September 1991, the date of his divorce, thereby entitling the applicant to an SBP annuity effective 6 August 1998, the date of the FSM’s death.


2. DFAS will conduct an audit of the FSM’s records to determine if any SBP costs are owed. If so, such costs will be deducted from the applicant’s SBP annuity until such costs are paid back.

BOARD VOTE:

__EMW__ __HOF__ __MVT__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                           Ernest M. Willcher
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR1997009264
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 19990520
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001548

    Original file (20090001548.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that she be provided an annuity under the FSM’s Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009158

    Original file (20110009158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. There is no evidence the FSM attempted to change his elected SBP from spouse to former spouse prior to his death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005777C070208

    Original file (20040005777C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 March 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040005777 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007567

    Original file (20120007567.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 14 May 1996, the applicant and the FSM were divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement (or during an open-season election prior to his/her divorce), or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003619C070205

    Original file (20060003619C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a DA Form 5002 (SBP Election); the FSM’s Alimony Support Statement; a General Power of Attorney; a DFAS-CL Form 5890-2 (Designation of Beneficiary Information); the FSM’s Retiree Account Statement; the FSM’s Last Will and Testament; the FSM’s and the applicant’s joint bank account statement; an Assignment of Proceeds of Insurance with a listing of funeral expenses; a divorce decree; and the FSM’s Certificate of Death. There is no evidence that either the FSM or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015647

    Original file (20080015647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased ex-husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse at the full base pay rate. The applicant states, in effect, she and the FSM, who was already retired from the Army, married in December 1985 and had two children together. There is no evidence that shows the FSM submitted a written request to DFAS to change the SBP coverage from spouse and children to former...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004116

    Original file (20070004116.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Copies of DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) dated 13 November 1979 which shows the deceased retiree elected spouse only SBP coverage. The divorce decree did not award the SBP to the applicant nor did the applicant provide a deemed election to DFAS within one year from the date of divorce. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002391C070206

    Original file (20050002391C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The FSM and the applicant divorced in 1989. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM requested his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019282

    Original file (20130019282.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired, and now deceased, former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity. On 13 December 2012, by letter, DFAS officials notified the applicant that in order for a former spouse to be eligible for an SBP the member would have to request in writing to change the SBP election from spouse to former spouse, or the divorce decree...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013553

    Original file (20060013553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage, although the 1983 divorce decree did not entitle her to make a request for a deemed election. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. But neither...