Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001251
Original file (20090001251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090001251 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his reentry (RE) code be changed from RE-3 to RE-1A.   

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his RE code of RE-3 was based on him being a non-citizen and that it should be changed to RE-1A based on the fact he has now obtained United States citizenship and wishes to continue his military service.  

3.  The applicant provides a certificate of naturalization and a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 20 September 1995, and that he was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 92A (Automated Logistical Specialist).   

3.  The applicant's record shows that he was selected for reassignment to Fort Huachuca, Arizona, on 9 September 2001, which required him to have a minimum of 13 months remaining to his expiration term of service (ETS) date.  

4.  On 19 September 2001, after being advised of the options available to him to acquire sufficient remaining service to satisfy the commitment based on his reassignment, the applicant refused to take the necessary action to meet the length of service requirement.  He was then advised that his failure to comply with the commitment would prohibit him from reenlistment or extension of enlistment.  He was informed that he could be eligible to join the Reserve Component.  

5.  Subsequent to counseling, the applicant completed a Declination of Continued Service Statement (DCSS) and confirmed he had been counseled on the effects his refusal would have on his Army career and on any future decision he might make concerning reenlistment or enlistment after separation.  The applicant authenticated the DCSS with his signature in Section B (Soldier's Acknowledgment of Counseling).  

6.  On 25 February 2002, the applicant completed an in-service enlistment contract for the Army National Guard (ARNG).  

7.  On 22 June 2002, the applicant was honorably released from active duty, in the rank of sergeant, under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation
635-200, by reason of completion of required service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed a total of 6 years, 9 months, and 3 days of active military service, and that he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of MBK and an RE code of RE-3.    

8.  The applicant served in the ARNG from 23 June 2002 through 22 June 2004, at which time he was honorably discharged, by reason of expiration of service obligation after completing a total of 9 years of military service.  The NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) he was issued at the time shows he was assigned a RE code of RE-1.  


9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (statutory or other directives), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.   

10.  Table 2-3 of the SPD code regulation identifies the SPD codes applicable to enlisted personnel and lists the SPD code of MBK as being applicable to members separated under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of completion of required service and indicates note 6 is applicable.  Note 6 states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code of MBK is applicable to members with a DCSS in force who are REFRAD and transferred to the Reserve Component.  The Department of the Army SPD/RE Cross Reference Table indicates that Soldiers separated under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200 who receive the SPD code of MBK will receive an RE code of RE-3 or RE-1.  It further stipulates, in pertinent part, that when a Soldier's record indicates he has a DCSS in force RE-1 will be disregarded and the RE-3 code will be assigned. 

11.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the United States Army Reserve (USAR).  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.  RE-4 applies to persons who have a nonwaivable disqualification.  RE-3 applies to persons who have a waivable disqualification.  

12.  Paragraph 3-23 of the above regulation provides guidance on determining enlistment/assignment eligibility and states that RA enlistment eligibility will be based on the last discharge or separation.  If the last period of service was in a Reserve Component (RC) qualification will be based on that separation/ discharge.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that the RE code of RE-3 he was assigned upon his REFRAD should be changed to an RE-1A was carefully considered.  However, by regulation, an RE-3 is the proper code to assign members separated at the completion of their required active service when a DCSS is in force.  

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant refused to take action to acquire the remaining service necessary to meet the length of service requirement for reassignment and he signed a DCSS on 19 September 2001.  The DCSS remained in force at the time of his 22 June 2002 REFRAD.  Therefore, absent any evidence of an error or injustice related to the assigned RE code, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.  

3.  By regulation, RA enlistment eligibility will be based on the last discharge or separation.  If the last period of service was performed in a RC, qualification will be based on that separation/discharge.  

4.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant served in the ARNG from 
23 June 2002 through 22 June 2004, at which time he was honorably discharged by reason of completion of required service and assigned an RE code of RE-1.  As a result, it appears he is eligible to reenlist in the RA based on that last RE code.  Therefore, a change of the RE-3 code he was assigned upon his REFRAD is not necessary for him to enlist in the RA at this time.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001251



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001251



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016827C080407

    Original file (20070016827C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that in October 2007, he attempted to enlist in the United States Army Reserve (USAR); however, his recruiter informed him that he required a waiver of his RE-3 code to enlist. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his REFRAD on 4 January 1998, shows he separated under the provisions of Chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of completion of required service, and that he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of MBK and an RE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009755

    Original file (20120009755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He adds he made it clear to the retention office that if he could not get his choice in duty locations he would reenlist for the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). The SPD/RE Code Cross-Reference Table indicates the SPD code of MBK will have an RE code of 3 assigned when a Soldier's record contains a DCSS. As such, there is no error or injustice in either the SPD or RE codes he was assigned at the time of his release from the RA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003546

    Original file (20150003546 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty this period on 1 February 2005; was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 25 February 2011 in accordance with AR 635-200, chapter 4, based on completion of required active service; and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve) to complete his Reserve obligation. Records show the applicant signed a DCSS; therefore, he was ineligible for continued active service. The evidence of record shows RE code "4"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014807

    Original file (20130014807.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The SPD code of MBK is the correct code for RA Soldiers eligible to reenlist, or with a DCSS in force, who are discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, upon the completion of their enlistment and transferred to the Reserve components to complete military service obligation. The SPD code of MBK has a corresponding RE code of "RE-3" when a Soldier's record indicates the Soldier has signed a DCSS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014171C080407

    Original file (20070014171C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeffrey C. Redmann | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code MBK is the appropriate code to assign to RA Soldiers who are eligible to reenlist with a Declination of Continued Service Statement (DCSS) in force who are REFRAD on completion of enlistment and transferred to the USAR to complete their military service obligation and are separated under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010267

    Original file (20090010267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It stipulates that the SPD code of MBK will be assigned to Soldiers separated under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of completion of required service, who have a DCSS in force and are REFRAD and transferred to the RC. However, by regulation, an RE-3 is the proper code to assign members REFRAD at the completion of their required active service when a DCSS is in force.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003095

    Original file (20140003095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 28 June 2000; was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 18 December 2005 in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4, based on completion of required active service; and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation. The evidence of record shows the applicant signed a DCSS; therefore, he was ineligible for continued...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020962

    Original file (20130020962.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SPD code of "LBK" is the correct code for RA Soldiers REFRAD for completion of required active service under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200 who sign a DCSS or are ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment at the completion of their enlistment. The SPD code of "MBK" is the correct code for Soldiers REFRAD for completion of required active service under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200 when eligible to reenlist and are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020942

    Original file (20110020942.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SPD code of "MBK" is the correct code for Soldiers REFRAD for completion of required active service under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200. This code is used for RA Soldiers eligible to reenlist or with a DCSS who are REFRAD on completion of enlistment and transferred to the Reserve components to complete military service obligation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011234

    Original file (20130011234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of Item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "1" instead of "3." Only when there is evidence to support an incorrect RE code or when there is an administrative error will an applicant be advised to request a correction; b. an RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. They are fully qualified for enlistment if all...