Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001216
Original file (20090001216.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090001216 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that she be provided with a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period from 21 November 1990 to 3 January 1991.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that she was activated with her National Guard unit for Operation Desert Storm.

3.  The applicant provides copies of orders to and from active duty in support of her request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Arkansas Army National Guard on 30 June 1988. She completed initial active duty for training (IADT) and returned to her unit.

3.  Orders 228-257, dated 21 November 1990, issued by the Office of the Adjutant General, Arkansas Army Nation Guard, ordered the applicant's unit, the 148th Evacuation Hospital, to active duty for a period of 6 months.  The applicant is listed on an attached roster as one of the members.

4.  Orders 2-241, dated 3 January 1991, issued by 5th Personnel Service Company, Fort Polk, Louisiana, released the applicant and others from the 148th Evacuation Hospital, Fort Polk, Louisiana, and assigned them to Troop Command, Camp Robinson, North Little Rock, Arkansas.

5.  On 29 June 1994 the applicant was released from the Army National Guard at the expiration of her active Army National Guard commitment and transferred to the Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) with an honorable characterization of service.

6.  Block 18 (Remarks) of the applicant's NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service) lists her IADT period, but does not list any other period of active duty service.

7.  National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management) includes guidance for completion of the NGB Form 22.  It requires that all periods of active Federal service to include active duty, IADT, and Active Guard Reserve be listed in block 18.

8.  The applicant's Army National Guard Current Annual Statement, dated 19 July 1993, covers the period from 30 June 1988 through 29 June 1993.  It does not indicate any period active duty service.  The applicant reviewed and initialed this form on 19 September 1993.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states, in effect, that she was activated with her National Guard unit for Operation Desert Storm and served on active duty from 21 November 1990 to 3 January 1991.

2.  The applicant received orders activating her unit and releasing her from active duty; however there is no available evidence, such as pay records, to show that she actually served.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
 
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001216



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001216



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004524

    Original file (20140004524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 4 April 2005, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge and determined his discharge was both proper and equitable. His conviction, confinement, and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003379

    Original file (20080003379.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She also states that Block 24 shows her service as uncharacterized and this should be corrected. Her DD Form 214 shows that she had 1 month and 28 days of foreign service during her active duty mobilization, but it does not indicate the "from-to" dates of that service. However, if the San Antonio newspaper is correct in reporting the applicant's unit deployed on 13 January, and if the applicant's DD Form 214 is correct in stating she served 1 month and 28 days of foreign service, then she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015519

    Original file (20070015519.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 5 (Oversea Service) of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), which he signed on or about 20 March 1993 and last reviewed on December 1997, does not show that he served in Vietnam or show that he received any awards from Vietnam. The applicant provided copies of service medical records, dated February 1969. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015519

    Original file (20070015519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was assigned to Fort Carson, CO from 9 August 1968 through 12 March 1970. Item 5 (Oversea Service) of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), which he signed on or about 20 March 1993 and last reviewed on December 1997, does not show that he served in Vietnam or show that he received any awards from Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006290

    Original file (20110006290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards. Therefore, this military document alone is insufficient evidence as a basis to correct her DD Form 214 to show these awards. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001724

    Original file (20090001724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. an increase in her rank and pay grade from private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3 to an unspecified rank and pay grade; b. the time period during which she was mobilized and served on active duty in support of Operation Desert Storm; c. her social security account...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019892

    Original file (20130019892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he has 20 years of creditable service for retirement. The applicant provides copies of: * his history of events while in the ARNG, dated 21 October 2013 * a 21 October 2010 Army Review Boards Agency letter * a 2 July 2013 Connecticut National Guard letter * 22 August 2013 congressional correspondence * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) ending 26 November 1973 * National Guard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002430

    Original file (20070002430.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders Number 176-041 was published on 25 June 2001, ordering the applicant to full time National Guard duty, with an effective date of 19 August 2001 and a active duty commitment of 2 years, 10 months and 11 days. Her Army National Guard Retirement Point History Statement shows that she has 22 years, 10 months and 12 days of creditable service for retired pay. Retirement:" as 22 years, 10 month and 12 days; and b) recalculating her retired pay based on 22 years, 10 months and 12 days of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009726

    Original file (20120009726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) be "updated" to show all of her training and the exact dates of "tours." It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. A DD Form 214 is issued to Reserve component (RC) Soldiers who complete IADT with award of an MOS, complete 90...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007693

    Original file (20080007693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board’s denial of her request to correct her separation document (DD Form 214) to show that her pay grade was E-4 upon her release from active duty and to reflect that she participated in Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm. The DD Form 215 dated 18 March 1997 shows that the applicant's record was corrected to show specialist four, E-4. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...