Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001124
Original file (20090001124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090001124 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, a change to the reason for his discharge and to his reentry eligibility (RE) code.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was falsely accused of being a homosexual by another Soldier.  He claims collective action was taken against him to affect his discharge and that it is time to look at the quality of his entire 8 years of service and resolve this matter.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) Case Report and Directive completed on him in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 20 September 2000.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 88N (Traffic Management Coordinator).  He was promoted to the rank of specialist (SPC) on 1 May 2003 and this was the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.

2.  The applicant's record shows that during his active duty tenure he earned the National Defense Service Medal, Korea Defense Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, and Overseas Service Ribbon.  His record documents no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition.

3.  On 25 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate action to separate the applicant under the provisions of chapter 15, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of homosexual conduct. 
The unit commander cited the applicant's engagement in homosexual acts with another male Soldier as the basis for taking the action.  The unit commander recommended the applicant receive a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

4.  On 25 July 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the basis of the contemplated separation action and its effects, the rights available to him, and the effect of any action he took to waive those rights.  Subsequent to receiving this legal counsel, the applicant completed a conditional waiver of his rights, which included his voluntary waiver of his right to have his case considered by an administrative separation board, contingent on receiving not less than an honorable discharge (HD).  The applicant elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf and confirmed that he was making the conditional waiver request of his own free will and had not been subjected to any coercion whatsoever by any person.

5.  On 26 July 2005, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of chapter 15, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct and directed the applicant receive an HD.  On 28 July 2005, the applicant was discharged accordingly.  The DD Form 214 he was issued confirms he held the rank of SPC and had completed a total of 4 years, 10 months, and 9 days of active military service at the time of his discharge.  It further confirms that based on the authority and reason for his discharge, he was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of JRA and an RE code of 4.

6.  On 11 June 2008, the ADRB, after carefully examining the applicant's record of service and the issues presented by the applicant, determined the applicant's discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change the reason for his discharge.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the policy for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 15 contains the policy for discharging members for homosexual conduct, which includes homosexual acts, statements that demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts, or homosexual marriage or attempted marriage.  The criteria for discharge under these provisions include a Soldier engaging in, attempting to engage in, or solicit another person to engage in, a homosexual act or acts.

8.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes the basic eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including Regular Army RE codes.  RE-4 applies to persons who have a nonwaivable disqualification.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code JRA is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of chapter 15, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE-4 code will be assigned to members separated under these provisions with an SPD code of JRA.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that the reason for his discharge was unjust has been considered was carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant's separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation, which includes the assignment of SPD code JRA and RE code 4.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.

3.  The record further confirms that the applicant completed a conditional waiver of his rights contingent on receiving an HD and that he was discharged under the terms of this voluntary conditional waiver.  It also shows that the applicant waived his right to have his case considered by an administrative separation board and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.  Therefore, it is clear the applicant took no action to contest the basis for his discharge during his separation processing.

4.  Absent any evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant showing any error or injustice related to his discharge processing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support a change to the reason for his discharge.

5.  Further, although not requested by the applicant, given an RE code change was included in his ADRB application, this issue was also carefully considered during this process.  However, the evidence of record confirms the RE-4 code he was assigned at discharge was and remains valid based on the authority and reason for his discharge.  Therefore, it would also not be appropriate to change his RE code at this time.

6.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant and his counsel have failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001124



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001124



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020630

    Original file (20090020630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals are assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The "JRA" Separation Code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 15, Army Regulation 635-200, Homosexual Conduct (Acts). The evidence of record shows the applicant’s RE code was assigned based on the fact that she was separated under the provisions of chapter 15 of Army Regulation 635-200 for...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130016702

    Original file (AR20130016702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 25 June 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130016702 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The separation authority directed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003368

    Original file (20120003368.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 December 1984, the applicant's commander recommended the applicant's discharge under the provisions of paragraph 15-3a of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), due to homosexuality. The applicant was processed for discharge based on his own sworn statement that he was a homosexual, had engaged in homosexual acts, and approached others for the same.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079622C070215

    Original file (2002079622C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This board determined that the applicant did participate in a homosexual activity; and it recommended that he be discharged under the provisions of paragraph 15-3A, Army Regulation 635-200, and that he receive an honorable discharge. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation confirms that he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 15-3a, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of committing a Homosexual Act. The evidence of record confirms that by his own...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004262

    Original file (AR20130004262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 July 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130004262 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of the applicant's service is inequitable and the reason for the separation is now inequitable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009322

    Original file (20130009322.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains a DA Form 4856-R (General Counseling Form), dated 19 September 1986, which shows he was counseled because his commander was taking action to discharge him prior to his expiration term of service (ETS), under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel - Personnel Separations) for homosexuality. On 21 October 1986, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge IAW Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15, and directed his service be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001712

    Original file (20140001712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The commander's separation memorandum (as stated by the applicant in his statement, above), is erroneous and not supported by evidence. There is no evidence of previous counseling with respect to homosexual conduct, which the applicant was advised of by the commander for the first time on 31 October 2005. The evidence of record also shows the applicant received mental health, behavioral counseling, and family counseling.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019151

    Original file (AR20080019151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? However, the analyst noted that the separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-2, AR 635-200 is the discharge policy, therefore the separation authority should read paragraph 15-3a, and the narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Homosexual Conduct (Acts)” with the separation code as "JRA." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009596

    Original file (20140009596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. Counsel requests the separation authority, separation program designator (SPD) code, reentry eligibility (RE) code, and narrative reason for separation on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 17 April 1997 be changed. The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001128

    Original file (AR20130001128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a change to the narrative reason for his discharge from the Army. The available evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3a, AR 635-200, in effect at the time, by reason of a homosexual act. The Board considers any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority.