| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Member | ||
| Mr. Harry B. Oberg | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the separation authority, narrative reason for his discharge, separation program designator (SPD) code, and reentry (RE) code he was assigned at discharge be changed.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the separation authority, narrative reason for discharge, SPD and RE codes he was assigned at discharge must be changed in order to allow him enlist in the Air Force. He states that the separation action taken against him was an overreaction and not properly handled by his chain of command, and specifically his first sergeant (1SG). He claims that a one time experiment resulted in the Army labeling him as a homosexual. In support of application, he submits a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214), separation packet, and associated military documents.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 26 July 2000, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular Army. He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS)
92A (Automated Logistical Specialist). His record documents no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition, and it confirms that the highest rank he attained while on active duty was private first class/E-3.
On 15 March 2002, the applicant’s unit commander notified him that separation action was being initiated against him under the provisions of paragraph 15-3A, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of the commission of a homosexual act. The reason cited for the action was the applicant’s admission in a sworn statement that he had participated in a homosexual act. The applicant consulted legal counsel and after being advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action, he requested consideration of his case by a board of officers.
On 10 June 2002, a Board of Officers convened to consider the applicant’s separation from the service. This board determined that the applicant did participate in a homosexual activity; and it recommended that he be discharged under the provisions of paragraph 15-3A, Army Regulation 635-200, and that he receive an honorable discharge.
On 26 June 2002, the appropriate authority approved the findings and recommendation of the Board of Officers and directed that the applicant be discharged and receive an HD. On 27 July 2002, the applicant was discharged accordingly. At the time of his discharge, he had completed a total of 2 years and 1 day of active military service.
The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation confirms that he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 15-3a, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of committing a Homosexual Act. It also verifies that based on the authority and reason for his separation, he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JRA and a reentry (RE) code of RE-4.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 15 contains policies concerning homosexual conduct. Paragraph 15-3a, provides for the separation of members who engaged in, or solicited another to engage in a homosexual act.
Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. This regulation establishes the SPD code of JRA as the appropriate code to assign soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 15-3a, Army Regulation AR 635-200, based on committing a Homosexual Act. Additionally, the SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table establishes RE Code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to soldiers separated under this authority and for this reason.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s request that the authority and narrative reason for his discharge, and the resultant SPD and RE codes assigned be changed in order to allow him to enlist in the Air Force. However, the Board finds insufficient evidence to support these claims.
2. The evidence of record confirms that by his own admission, the applicant engaged in a homosexual act. As a result, he was separated under the provisions of paragraph 15-3a, Army Regulation AR 635-200, based on engaging in a homosexual act. Lacking evidence to the contrary, the Board finds that the separation authority, narrative reason for separation, to include the SPD and RE code assignment, were accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation.
3. The Board also finds that the RE-4 code assigned the applicant was appropriate based on the authority and reason for his discharge and the basis for this RE code assignment has not changed. In addition, there is no basis changing his RE code and the disqualification upon which the code was based is nonwaivable for reenlistment purposes.
4. The evidence of record also confirms that the applicant’s case was considered by a Board of Officers, at which the applicant and his legal counsel were personally present. The Board is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
5. In view of the facts of this case, and given the applicant’s admission that he did engage in a homosexual act prior to his separation, the Board is compelled to deny the applicant’s requested relief.
6. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__RWA__ __KYF___ __BPI__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002079622 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/12/19 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007389
The applicant requests correction of his records to reflect the separation authority and narrative reason for separation under current standards. On 8 June 1984, the separation authority approved the proposed discharge action and directed the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15, with service characterized as under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged on 25 June 1984 under the provisions of Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001128
The applicant requests a change to the narrative reason for his discharge from the Army. The available evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3a, AR 635-200, in effect at the time, by reason of a homosexual act. The Board considers any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022835
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019151
Applicant Name: ????? However, the analyst noted that the separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-2, AR 635-200 is the discharge policy, therefore the separation authority should read paragraph 15-3a, and the narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Homosexual Conduct (Acts) with the separation code as "JRA." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130016702
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 25 June 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130016702 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The separation authority directed the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003368
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 December 1984, the applicant's commander recommended the applicant's discharge under the provisions of paragraph 15-3a of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), due to homosexuality. The applicant was processed for discharge based on his own sworn statement that he was a homosexual, had engaged in homosexual acts, and approached others for the same.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090638C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE Codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Although the character of the applicant's discharge was changed the underlying basis for the discharge, homosexuality, did not.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006556
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The record indicates the applicant had a period of 20 days of time lost under USC 972 (021016-021104); thus, it appears the characterization of service was appropriate and in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. However, in view of the current standard it is recommended that the applicant's narrative reason for discharge be changed to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130019565
The DD Form 214 indicates that on 26 August 2004, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3a, AR 635-200, for homosexual act, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The record indicates the applicant achieved the rank of PFC/E-3 and was discharged as a PVT/E-1; thus, it appears the characterization of service was appropriate and in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. However, in view of the current...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009322
His record contains a DA Form 4856-R (General Counseling Form), dated 19 September 1986, which shows he was counseled because his commander was taking action to discharge him prior to his expiration term of service (ETS), under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel - Personnel Separations) for homosexuality. On 21 October 1986, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge IAW Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15, and directed his service be...