Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000961
Original file (20090000961.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090000961 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar      (M-60), three military occupational specialties (MOS), and any other awards and decorations he may have earned.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 contains errors. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 6 October 1966; a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); a copy of Special Orders Number 36, issued by Headquarters, Fort Polk, LA, on 11 February 1964; and copies of Special Orders Number 44 and 253, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Aviation Center, Fort Rucker, AL, on 3 March 1964 and 17 December 1964, in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 7 October 1963.  He completed basic combat training at Fort Leonard Wood, MO, on or about 3 January 1964, and proceeded to Fort Polk, LA, where he completed advanced individual training for MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantry).  He then proceeded to Fort Rucker, AL, and completed training for MOS 51M ((Fire Fighter).  

3.  On 20 April 1964, Headquarters, Special Troops, U.S. Army Aviation Center, Fort Rucker, AL,  published Special Orders Number 77, awarding the applicant secondary MOS 525.10 (Fire Fighter).  This MOS was re-designated as 51M in 1964. 

4.  On 14 August 1964, Headquarters, Special Troops, U.S. Army Aviation Center, Fort Rucker, AL, published Special Orders Number 146, awarding the applicant primary MOS 525.10 and primary MOS 111.00 (Light Weapons Infantryman).  MOS 111.00 was re-designated as 11B in 1964.

5.  The applicant's records also show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 1 April 1965 to on or about 27 March 1966.  He was assigned to the 92nd Aviation Company.

6.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows his principal duty was in MOS 09B (Trainee) on 14 October 1963, MOS 11B on 4 January 1964, and MOS 51M on 3 March 1964.

7.  The applicant's records further show he was honorably separated in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) on 6 October 1966.

8.  Item 25a (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "51M Fire Fighter." 

9.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Good Conduct Medal.  


10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).  This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.  Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing 6 months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal.

11.  Headquarters, Fort Polk, LA, Special Orders Number 36, dated 11 February 1964, show the applicant was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60) on 29 January 1964.

12.  Review of the applicant's records indicates his entitlement to additional awards that are not shown on his DD Form 214.

13.  Headquarters, Special Troops, U.S. Army Aviation Center, Fort Rucker, AL, Special Orders Number 198, dated 6 November 1964, show the applicant was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).

14.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows that the applicant participated in the Vietnam Defense Campaign (8 March 1865 to 24 December 1965) and the Vietnam Counteroffensive (25 December 1965 to 30 June 1966) campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.  A silver service star denotes five bronze service stars.

15.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that the 92nd Aviation Company was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation from 1 October 1964 to 31 December 1966 based on Department of the Army General Orders 17, dated 1968, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation from 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973, based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974.





DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60), three military occupational specialties (MOS), and any other awards and decorations he may have earned.

2.  With respect to the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the evidence of record shows the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 1 April 1965 to on or about 27 March 1966; therefore, he served a qualifying period of service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

3.  Special orders show that the applicant was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60) which are not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these badges.

4.  General orders awarded the applicant’s units of assignment the Meritorious Unit Commendation and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation which are not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards.

5.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.  Additionally, records show the applicant participated in two campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to award of two bronze service stars to be affixed to the Vietnam Service Medal.

6.  With respect to the applicant's MOS, the evidence of record shows the applicant completed formal training for and was awarded two specialties, 51M (Firefighter) and 11B (Light Weapons Infantry), one of which is not listed on his DD Form 214.  The 09B designation is not an MOS; it is assigned to Soldiers who complete basic combat training but fail to compete formal schooling for award of an MOS.  







BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

_____X___  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  adding the entry "11B Light Weapons Infantryman" to item 25a of the applicant's DD Form 214; and

	b.  awarding the applicant the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60), the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and two bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal, and adding these awards to his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to listing a third MOS in item 25a of his DD Form 214.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000961



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000961



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011591

    Original file (20070011591.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record further shows that his grade is correctly reflected in Item 3a of his DD Form 214. Evidence of record further shows that PMOS 72M2P is correctly reflected in Item 25a of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to change the applicant's grade, MOS, and civilian occupation associated with this MOS; listing his certificate of achievement, letter of commendation, Soldier of the Month Award, and the Cold War...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020412

    Original file (20090020412.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003356C070206

    Original file (20050003356C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 December 1967 shows the Vietnam Service Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the first award of the Good Conduct Medal, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar as authorized awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry in item 10a on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007642

    Original file (20120007642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, through a member of Congress, requests: * correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Medal with 8 oak leaf clusters * a copy of his separation physical examination from 1967 * update of his DA Form 759 (Individual Flight Record – Army Aviator) * award of the Silver Star for being injured in a helicopter crash in March 1966 * any other awards he is entitled to 2. The applicant provides: * a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014398

    Original file (20080014398.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Parachutist Badge. General Orders awarded the applicant the Air Medal for meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight in the Republic of Vietnam which is not shown on his records; therefore,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009671

    Original file (20100009671.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following information: * separation as a sergeant (E-5) * conversion in 1965 of the MOS 111.07 to the new MOS designation of 11B1P (Light Weapons Infantryman - Parachute qualified) * foreign service in Okinawa from 19 November 1963 through 4 May 1965 with assignment to Company C, 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment * award of the Parachutist Badge, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam), and the Marksman Marksmanship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020495

    Original file (20140020495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records shows Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, General Orders (GO) Number 1650, dated 25 March 1968, and GO Number 7444, dated 7 November 1968, announced award of the AM to the applicant for meritorious achievement from 12 October 1967 to 29 February 1968. Therefore, it is concluded that he is entitled to correction of his records to show one award of the AM; b. GOs awarded the applicant the Soldier's Medal for heroism; c. the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005341

    Original file (20130005341.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 November 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130005341 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He completed training and he was awarded MOS 93B. Although the applicant completed training for award of MOS 93B and he held this MOS throughout his service, he is not eligible for the Basic Aviation Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000115

    Original file (20090000115.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) for the period from 1 September 1964 to 31 August 1967; and b. adding to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000222

    Original file (20100000222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s records contain orders awarding him the Air Medal (2nd through 13th award). Additionally, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Basic Aviation Badge that was omitted from his records and that all units assigned to the U.S. Army Vietnam were awarded the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 26 of his DD Form 214 the...