Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020013
Original file (20080020013.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       26 March 2009   

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080020013 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her award of the Army Commendation Medal be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the final approval of the award did not occur until after her release from active duty.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the approved DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) with order number.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was commissioned a captain in the Army Reserve Veterinary Corps and entered active duty on 2 July 2002.

3.  On 25 March 2005, the applicant's command initiated a DA Form 638 recommending her for the award of the Meritorious Service Medal.  On 11 April 2005, the intermediate authority recommended the award be downgraded to the Army Commendation Medal.  The award approval authority approved the award of the Army Commendation Medal on 13 April 2005.

4.  The DA Form 638 shows that U.S. Army Medical Command, Fort Sam Houston, Permanent Order Number 112-2 was issued on 22 April 2005 awarding the applicant the Army Commendation Medal.

5.  The applicant was released from active duty on 7 July 2005 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) having served honorably for 3 years and 6 days.

6.  The applicant is currently serving in the Ready Reserve and has been promoted to major.

7.  Her 7 July 2005 DD Form 214 lists her awards as the Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award), the National Defense Service Medal, the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, and the Army Service Ribbon.

8.  Except what is listed on her DD Form 214, the applicant's Integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System file contains no copies of orders, certificates, or other notations for any of the applicant's awards or decorations.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states, in effect, that the final approval of the award did not occur until after her release from active duty. 

2.  The DD Form 638 shows that the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal in accordance with U.S. Army Medical Command, Fort Sam Houston Permanent Order Number 112-2.

3.  It is appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show she was awarded the Army Commendation Medal on 22 April 2005.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080020013



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080020013



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006306

    Original file (20090006306.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award). Unfortunately, her iPERMS record only contains one set of orders awarding her the Army Achievement Medal (for the period 1 September 2000 to 30 August 2001), so her iPERMS record does not provide evidence of the correct number of awards. In the absence of clear evidence that the applicant was awarded more than three Army Achievement Medals, the Board must presume regularity as to the number of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007583

    Original file (20090007583.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 SEPTEMBER 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090007583 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be amended to show additional awards of the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Achievement Medal. The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214, two DA Forms 638 (Recommendation for Award), her DA Form 71 (Oath of Office), and two award certificates.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017410

    Original file (20130017410.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, U.S. Army Medical Command, Fort Sam Houston, Permanent Order Number 165-103, dated 14 June 2013, awarded her the Legion of Merit for service from 1 June 2003 to 31 May 2013. Her intermediate chain of command recommended downgrading the award to the Meritorious Service Medal and issued orders awarding her the Meritorious Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * removing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011398

    Original file (20070011398.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR) and the award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). The applicant's military service records show that she entered active duty on 20 September 2000. Evidence shows that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013648

    Original file (20100013648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition, he provided a DA Form 638 showing he was awarded by Permanent Order Number 212-06 the Meritorious Service Medal by the commanding general of the 72nd Brigade Combat Team (TXARNG) upon his retirement for his period of service from 1 June 1988 to 21 January 2009. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant was awarded a second Army Commendation Medal on 30 June 2008 and upon his retirement, a Meritorious Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004464

    Original file (20140004464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show his DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), which awarded him the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (6th Award), was filed in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) prior to 12 August 2013, the date the Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13) Lieutenant Colonel (LTC), Judge Advocate General’s (JAG) Corps, Promotion Selection Board convened. It applies to officers in the Regular Army, the ARNG, and USAR officers on an active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000847

    Original file (20100000847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was recommended for or awarded the Legion of Merit. There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was recommended for or awarded the Legion of Merit. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014351

    Original file (20140014351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, she provides an LOM Certificate dated 13 March 1992 showing she was awarded the LOM for meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service during the period 1 April 1981 to 31 March 1992 and that her performance reflected great credit on the U.S. Health Services Command. Each individual approaching retirement may be considered for an appropriate decoration based on his or her grade, years of service, degree of responsibility, and manner of performance. Meritorious...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001195

    Original file (20100001195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. He is entitled to award of the Kosovo Campaign Medal with one bronze service star and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this medal; and c. served on active duty from 1 May 1987 to 30 June 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004050

    Original file (20110004050.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge and correction to his Army Commendation Medal to show the "V" device for valor. Within the information provided to HRC, there was no record or mention that the applicant performed his medical duties while his combat patrol was engaged in active ground combat with the purpose to close with and destroy the enemy with direct fires. Therefore, with no supporting evidence showing his combat patrol was directly engaged with the enemy, this...