Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019741
Original file (20080019741.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019741 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he served in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states that he served in Vietnam on the Army's LT-529 from January 1970 to October 1971.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a statement from an individual who states that he served aboard the LT-529 in Vietnam with the applicant.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 





substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army, on 17 October 1969, and he was awarded the military occupational specialty of seaman, and was promoted to pay grade E-4.  

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Item 31 (Foreign Service), shows the applicant served in Okinawa from 28 April 1970 to 9 October 1971.

4.  All the documents contained in the applicant's military records show that he was assigned to a unit located in the Ryukyu Islands (the island chain which includes Okinawa).

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 9 October 1971.  His DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded any Vietnam service medals.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant submits a statement from an individual who says he served with the applicant on a vessel in Vietnam, all of the applicant's military records show that he served in Okinawa.

2.  As such, without corroborating evidence such as orders or morning reports, there is insufficient evidence in which to grant the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019741



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019741



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019624

    Original file (20110019624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the periods ending 1 July 1970 and 2 April 1973 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Letter from the Office of the Chief of Transportation * Letter from a former chief * Extract of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Although the detachment may have sailed out of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001386

    Original file (20110001386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his Vietnam area service in Thailand. The available evidence does not show he served in Vietnam or Thailand. _______ _ X___ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009628

    Original file (20130009628.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings for Docket Number AR20080003630, dated 17 September 2008 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to duty with the U.S. Army Finance Service Center, Ryukyu Islands, from 17 April 1969 to 15 August 1971. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019989

    Original file (20140019989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence of record showing he served in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003213

    Original file (20150003213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states, in effect: * he was sent to Vietnam on TDY in early December 1971 * this service was not reflected on his DD Form 214 * TDY may have been viewed as trivial at the time, but this is not the case today * he requests the Board to note his December 1971 sub-voucher initially showed the payment of hostile fire pay (HFP); it was taken away from him when he was at Oakland Army Base...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009970

    Original file (20080009970.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge; Army Commendation Medal; Army Achievement Medal; Good Conduct Medal; Army Service Ribbon; and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle, Pistol, and Grenade Bars. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. Records show the applicant qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016586

    Original file (20130016586.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), ending on 1 May 1972, to show his temporary duty (TDY) tours in Vietnam. The applicant's service personnel record shows he served in USARPAC-Okinawa for a period of 1 year and 6 months and his DD Form 214 properly lists this service in item 22c.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011428

    Original file (20080011428.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his service record shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam and Okinawa, but his DD Form 214 only shows Foreign Service in USARPAC (United States Army, Pacific). Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, prescribes that the DD Form 214 should show the Soldier's total active duty outside continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013349

    Original file (20110013349.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records contain no DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to indicate his DD Form 214 was corrected. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), dated 23 January 1967, specified that item 22c would contain the total amount of active duty served outside the continental limits of the United States during the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which the service was performed, e.g., "Foreign and/or Sea Service (USAREUR [United States Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014397

    Original file (20110014397.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and any other awards he is entitled to. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant served honorably...