Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019357
Original file (20080019357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       25 JUNE 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019357 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) and two awards of the Joint Meritorious Unit Award (JMUA).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the MSM was not added to her DD Form 214 because it was being processed by the chain of command at the time of her discharge.  She adds that the JMUA is also missing from her DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214, orders for the JMUA, award citations for the JMUA, a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) for the MSM, an award certificate for the MSM, a memorandum and by-name listing from the 6th Psychological Operations Battalion (Airborne), Subject:  Award of the NATO Medal, and a web page with JMUA information in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 31 August 1994 and upon completion of basic combat and advanced individual training she was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 31F (MSE Network Switching Systems Operator).  She reenlisted on 9 September 1997 and was honorably released from active duty on 11 July 2001 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete her remaining Reserve obligation.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show award of the MSM or any award of the JMUA.

3.  On a DA Form 638, dated 29 May 2001, the applicant was recommended for award of the MSM for the period 3 April 1995 to 12 August 2001.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC), Fort Bragg, NC, Permanent Orders Number 178-15, dated 27 June 2001, awarded her the MSM for the period 3 April 1995 to 12 August 2001.

4.  The applicant provided orders and award citations for the JMUA which show that Headquarters, Joint Task Force Shining Hope, Einsiedlerhof, Germany, was awarded the JMUA for the period 3 April 1999 to 1 July 1999 and Headquarters, Joint Task Force Noble Anvil, Naples, Italy, was awarded the JMUA for the period 31 January 1999 to 20 July 1999.

5.  The memorandum and by-name listing from the 6th Psychological Operations Battalion (Airborne) shows the applicant was awarded the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal for service in support of Kosovo Operations.

6.  Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1348.33 (Military Awards Program) provides, in pertinent part, that the Joint Meritorious Unit Award was authorized by the Secretary of Defense on 10 June 1981.  It is awarded to recognize joint units and activities for meritorious achievement or service, superior to those which are normally expected.  Qualifying achievements must be superior to that which is expected under conditions of combat with an armed enemy of the United States, a declared national emergency situation or extraordinary circumstances and should be operational in nature.  The Joint Meritorious Unit Award may not be awarded to any DOD activity which has received any other unit award for the same achievement or period of service.  An oak leaf cluster is authorized for wear for each additional award of the Joint Meritorious Unit Award.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Permanent orders awarded the applicant the MSM.  Therefore, she is entitled to have her records corrected to show this award.

2.  The orders and citation provided by the applicant for award of the JMUA show that the JMUA was awarded to Headquarters, Joint Task Force Shining Hope, Einsiedlerhof, Germany, during the period 3 April 1999 to 1 July 1999 and to Headquarters, Joint Task Force Noble Anvil, Naples, Italy, during the period 
31 January 1999 to 20 July 1999.  However, there is no evidence in the applicant's records, such as official orders, and she did not provide any evidence showing she was assigned or attached to these units during the period for which they were awarded the JMUA.  As a result, there is insufficient evidence to show she is entitled to this unit award or an oak leaf cluster to be affixed to the same.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ___X____  ____X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Meritorious Service Medal.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to two awards of the JMUA.



      __________XXX____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019357



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019357


3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008058

    Original file (20080008058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was awarded the Driver Badge on 11 March 2001 and that he was awarded the NATO Medal and the Kosovo Campaign Medal for his service in Kosovo from 7 November 2001 to 19 May 2002. The award certificate provided by the applicant which shows he was awarded the NATO Medal is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend his DD Form 214 to show the NATO Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068934C070402

    Original file (2002068934C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214; temporary duty orders assigning him to Bosnia; a Certificate of Participation; two award certificates for the NATO Medal and the ARCOM; a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award); and three messages authorizing the Kosovo Campaign Medal, the AFEM, and the NATO Medal for Kosovo. There is no evidence which shows the applicant was awarded the NATO Medal or the Kosovo Campaign Medal based on service in Kosovo. Evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008648

    Original file (20100008648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, he is entitled to award of the GWOTSM and correction of his records to show this service medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the following awards to item 13 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 December 2002: * AAM * AGCM (1st Award) * Kosovo Campaign Medal * NATO Medal with one...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004498C070206

    Original file (20050004498C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that her separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show combat service she performed in support of a military operation. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents that are prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002470C070205

    Original file (20060002470C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Achievement Medal and the Kosovo Campaign Medal. Service members who were awarded the NATO Medal for operations relating to the Republic of Yugoslavia and the NATO Medal for operations relating to Kosovo will wear a bronze service star on the NATO Medal. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Kosovo Campaign Medal and the NATO Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077491C070215

    Original file (2002077491C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also requests that the Armed Forces Service Medal, for participation in NATO operations related to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), and the Army Superior Unit Award be awarded to him and added to his DD Form 214. The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the NATO Medal, Kosovo Campaign Medal, the Armed Forces Service Medal, or the Army Superior Unit Award, as authorized awards. Evidence of record shows the applicant met the criteria for award of the NATO Medal, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008618

    Original file (20090008618.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides an Operation Allied Force Certificate; a memorandum for award of the Kosovo Campaign Medal; temporary change of station orders assigning the applicant's unit to the MFO mission in the Sinai, Egypt; an authorization to wear the MFO Medal; an MFO Certificate of Participation; a Total Army Personnel Command (TAPC) military personnel (MILPER) message pertaining to the NATO Medal; and a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his application. He further provided a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070732C070402

    Original file (2002070732C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214; an award certificate and orders for award of the Good Conduct Medal; two award certificates and two DA Forms 638 (Recommendation for Award) for the Army Commendation Medal; a Memorandum for Record, dated 9 August 2000, which authorizes wear of the Kosovo Campaign Medal; a Memorandum for Record, dated 9 August 2000, which authorizes wear of the Joint Meritorious Unit Award; a Memorandum, dated 26 July 2000, which authorizes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072166C070403

    Original file (2002072166C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded two awards of the NATO Medal for service in the former Yugoslavia and in Kosovo. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Kosovo Campaign Medal and correction of his discharge document to show this medal. one bronze service star, the Kosovo Campaign Medal and the Humanitarian Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100164C070208

    Original file (2004100164C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The undated NATO award certificate indicates that the applicant was awarded the NATO Service Medal for operations in Kosovo for the period from 28 June 1999 through 12 December 1999. The evidence of record shows that the applicant participated in operations in Kosovo and is authorized the NATO Service Medal, the Armed Forces Service Medal, and the Kosovo Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...