Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019333
Original file (20080019333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019333 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he served at Cam Ranh Bay, Vietnam and that he needs this information shown on his DD Form 214 to register for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health benefits.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, documents he sent to the VA, and a document he sent to the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Missouri in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 July 1965.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded the military occupational specialty of cook.  Specialist four/E-4 was the highest rank that he achieved.

3.  Item 31 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he served in the U.S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC) Okinawa from 1 December 1965 through 28 June 1967.

4.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant served in Vietnam/the Philippines in a temporary duty (TDY) status sometime between 6 August 1966 and 2 February 1967. 

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that on 28 June 1967 he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) with a honorable characterization of service after completing 1 year, 11 months, and 14 days of creditable active service.  

6.  Block 22c (Foreign and or Sea Service) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he served in the USARPAC 1 year, 6 months, and 28 days.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time prescribed in pertinent part that the last oversea theater in which service was performed would be entered in block 22c of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he served at Cam Ranh Bay, Vietnam.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 shows he served in a TDY status in Vietnam/Philippines.  However, it is not possible to determine from his records where, when, or how long he may have served in Vietnam.


2.  Even if it could be established that the applicant served in Cam Ranh Bay, Vietnam, there are no provisions for entering this information on the applicant's DD Form 214.  During the period the applicant served, the foreign service entry was limited to the theater as it is shown in Item 22c of the applicant’s DD Form 214.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019333



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019333



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016586

    Original file (20130016586.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), ending on 1 May 1972, to show his temporary duty (TDY) tours in Vietnam. The applicant's service personnel record shows he served in USARPAC-Okinawa for a period of 1 year and 6 months and his DD Form 214 properly lists this service in item 22c.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019624

    Original file (20110019624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the periods ending 1 July 1970 and 2 April 1973 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Letter from the Office of the Chief of Transportation * Letter from a former chief * Extract of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Although the detachment may have sailed out of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016980

    Original file (20120016980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His service record contains no permanent change of station orders, TDY orders, or any other official documents that shows he was ordered to or served in Vietnam from September to December 1966. Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contained guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and stated that item 18f shows the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002343

    Original file (20130002343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 173 (Joint Message Form), dated 11 September 1968, shows the applicant was released from the USARV Transient Detachment and reassigned to Fort Sill, OK. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006528

    Original file (20120006528.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states there is no record on file of him serving in these countries except the records he provides with this application. Qualifying service for this award includes service in Korea from 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974. d. The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014894

    Original file (20080014894.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military service records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 19 November 1965. In addition, the applicant’s military service records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011881

    Original file (20110011881.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant's third tour in the Republic of Vietnam is not properly documented on his separation DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 December 1971; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this foreign service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026586

    Original file (20100026586.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) and his tour of duty in Japan. The applicant requests, in effect, his DD Form 214 be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) and his tour of duty in Japan.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017204

    Original file (20090017204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he served in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows that subsequent to completion of his MOS training, the applicant was assigned to Fort Lewis, WA, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty on 20 August 1971. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of documentary evidence that shows he served in Vietnam, there is insufficient evidence to grant him relief in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002616

    Original file (20110002616.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant completed 1 year, 2 months, and 6 days of foreign service in USARPAC (RVN and Okinawa) from 8 February 1966 to 13 April 1967; however, his DD Form 214 shows 11 months and 17 days. He was assigned to the RVN from 8 February to 8 May 1966; therefore, it would be appropriate to enter his foreign service in the RVN in item 30 of his DD Form 214. Recording in item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry "RVN SERVICE: 8 February 1966 - 8 May 1966."