Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018545
Original file (20080018545.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       12 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018545 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United states Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he completed 7 years of foreign service instead of 3 years, 11 months, and 9 days.

2.  The applicant states that he completed 3 years and 6 months of foreign service in Germany and another 3 years and 6 months in the Republic of Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Forms 214, dated 30 July 1972 and 4 August 1960; a copy of his DD Form 214N (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge-Navy), dated 10 August 1976, and a copy of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of service), dated 8 October 1970, in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 4 August 1960.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training, and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 111.07 (Light Weapons Infantry).  He was subsequently assigned to Company D, 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry, Fort Campbell, Kentucky, on 22 December 1960.  He was honorably discharged on 30 July 1961 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.

3.  Item 24a (Net Service This Period) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 11 months and 27 days of creditable active military service, none of which was foreign service.

4.  The applicant’s records further show he executed a 6-year reenlistment in the Regular Army at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, on 31 July 1961.  He was subsequently reassigned to 7th U.S. Army in Germany on 30 August 1962.  He completed nearly 36 months of foreign service and departed on 10 August 1965 enroute to Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

5.  On 16 March 1966, the applicant departed Fort Campbell, Kentucky, enroute to the Republic of Vietnam.  He arrived in the Republic of Vietnam on 21 April 1966 and was initially assigned to Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, 101st Airborne Division.  He was subsequently reassigned to Company B, 1st Battalion, 327th Infantry Regiment.  He departed the Republic of Vietnam on 17 April 1967 and arrived at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, where he was ultimately discharged on 28 July 1967.

6.  Item 22 of his DD Form 214, dated 28 July 1961, shows he completed 5 years, 11 months, and 28 days of creditable active military service, 3 years, 11 months, and 9 days of which was foreign service.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training and will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  Item 22c (Foreign and Sea Service) of the version in effect at the time, showed, for enlisted personnel, the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214. 
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he completed 7 years of foreign service

2.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed 2 years, 11 months and 12 days of foreign service in Germany, from 30 August 1962 to 10 August 1965, and 11 months and 27 days of foreign service in the Republic of Vietnam, from 21 April 1966 to 17 April 1967.  Therefore, he completed a total of 3 years, 11 months, and 9 days of foreign service, which is correctly shown on his DD Form 214, dated 28 July 1967.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.  Therefore, he is not entitled to relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018545



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018545



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001298

    Original file (20090001298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 17 (Foreign Service) shows he served in the U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) in the Republic of Korea from 19 April 1967 through 23 February 1968; in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 27 January through 3 April 1969; and in Hawaii from 4 April through 22 June 1969. c. Item 18 (Record of Assignments), in pertinent part, shows the applicant was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 5th Battalion, 1st Infantry, Fort Campbell, Kentucky, and served in MOS 8510 (Combat Artist) while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010310

    Original file (20070010310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he had 3 years of active federal service at the time of his discharge on 15 January 1964. His records also show that he was separated from Fort Campbell, Kentucky. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any, to show he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007674

    Original file (20100007674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was issued a second DD Form 214 for the enlistment period 30 April 1967 to 12 December 1969 that shows in item 22c his last overseas command was in USAREUR. During the timeframe the applicant served Army Regulation 635-5 provided that a Soldier would be issued a DD Form 214 for each enlistment period and item 22c would show the last overseas command in which a Soldier performed. A later revision of Army Regulation 635-5 directed that the inclusive date of service for duty in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006728

    Original file (20130006728.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016235

    Original file (20100016235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 4 June 1971 to show: * He had 2 years, 6 months, and 6 days of Foreign and/or Sea Service * The Army Commendation Medal * Four bronze service stars affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal * His service in Vietnam from 14 March 1968 through 24 March 1969 2. Item 30 (Remarks) of his last DD Form 214 shows 14 March 1969 through 24 March 1969 and 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020838

    Original file (20110020838.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Korea. On 13 January 2010, he was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) that added award of the National Defense Service Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016978

    Original file (20080016978.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size while assigned in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002341

    Original file (20120002341.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * He was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star on 25 January 1969 * He wants his service with the 101st Airborne Division included on his DD Form 214 3. There is no evidence to show the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019699

    Original file (20120019699.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show completion of 1 year, 9 months, and 29 days of foreign service in USARPAC. c. Furthermore, there will be no harm to the Army or the applicant if his Vietnam service from 8 February 1967 to 4 February 1968 and from 22 October 1968 to 17 August 1969 is also listed in item 30 of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005369

    Original file (20110005369.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. General orders clearly show the applicant was awarded the Air Medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting all...