Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006728
Original file (20130006728.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 December 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130006728 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not reflect his two tours in Vietnam from October 1969 to March 1971. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, orders transferring him to Vietnam, and orders transferring him to Germany. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s official records, though somewhat incomplete, show that he was inducted on 29 April 1969 and was transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky to undergo his basic training.

3.  On 4 May 1969, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of enlisting in the Regular Army.

4.  On 5 May 1969, he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years and training as a petroleum storage specialist.  He completed his basic training and was transferred to Fort Lee, Virginia where he completed his advanced individual training before being transferred to Vietnam on 11 October 1969.

5.  He was assigned to the 201st Aviation Company until he departed on 29 April 1971 for assignment to Germany.  He arrived in Germany on 4 June 1971 and remained there until 16 January 1972 when he was transferred to Fort Dix, New Jersey and was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD).  He had served a total of 2 years, 8 months, and 26 days of active service.

6.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and the Good Conduct Medal. It also shows that he served 7 months and 7 days of foreign service.

7.  A review of the available records shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for meritorious achievement in Vietnam during the period 11 October 1969 to 10 March 1970.

8.  He served in six campaigns in Vietnam during the period of 11 October 1969 – 29 April 1971 for 1 year, 6 months, and 19 days of foreign service in Vietnam and a total of 2 years, 1 month, and 26 days of total foreign service.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.  This same regulation states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each credited campaign.  A silver service star is authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  

11.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the applicant’s unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his service in Vietnam should be reflected on his DD Form 214 has been noted and found to have merit.  It appears that the applicant was separated on temporary records at the time and his service in Vietnam was not reflected on those records.

2.  Accordingly, the entry “Service in Vietnam 11 October 1969 – 29 April 1971” should be added to item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 dated 16 January 1972.

3.  The awards of the ARCOM, Vietnam Service Medal with one silver and one bronze service star, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation should be added to his DD Form 214.

4.  Additionally, the entry in item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) should be corrected to reflect 2 years, 1 month, and 26 days of total foreign service. 

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
* Deleting the entry “0  7  7” from item 22c of his DD Form 214
* Entering the entry “2  1  26” to 22c of his DD Form 214
* Adding awards of the ARCOM, Vietnam Service Medal with one silver and one bronze service star, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation should be added to his DD Form 214
* Adding the entry  “Service in Vietnam 11 October 1969 – 29 April 1971” to item 30 of his DD Form 214

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006728





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006728



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004372

    Original file (20140004372.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence shows he was awarded the ARCOM on 4 occasions during his service in Vietnam; however, 1 of those awards was made for a period of service already recognized by a previous ARCOM award. He served in Vietnam during five campaigns; therefore, he is entitled to award of one silver service star to be added to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction to his DD Form 214 to show this service star. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016235

    Original file (20100016235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 4 June 1971 to show: * He had 2 years, 6 months, and 6 days of Foreign and/or Sea Service * The Army Commendation Medal * Four bronze service stars affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal * His service in Vietnam from 14 March 1968 through 24 March 1969 2. Item 30 (Remarks) of his last DD Form 214 shows 14 March 1969 through 24 March 1969 and 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011881

    Original file (20110011881.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant's third tour in the Republic of Vietnam is not properly documented on his separation DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 December 1971; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this foreign service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012668

    Original file (20090012668.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his last duty assignment was the 196th Aviation Company and to document both his tours in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the 1st award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 2 October 1967 through 25 September 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007434

    Original file (20090007434.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he served 2 years in Vietnam; however, his DD Form 214 reflects only 1 year and 6 days of foreign service in block 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service). The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, but it does not show that he was awarded any bronze service stars to signify campaign participation credit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021325

    Original file (20120021325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of record he was issued a DD Form 214 for his period of service from 6 May 1969 through 6 February 1971. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 * adding the following awards to his DD Form 214 * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018284

    Original file (20130018284.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows in: a. item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), he completed 1 year and 22 days of foreign service but does not contain the name of the major overseas theater or command, in his case, U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC); b. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) c. item 30 (Remarks), no entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008735

    Original file (20080008735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a DD Form 214 for the period ending 8 May 1970, a DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 September 1967, and a citation and award certificate for the Army Commendation Medal. Evidence of record shows the applicant served in Vietnam from 20 May 1968 through 6 May 1970, a total of 1 year, 11 months, and 17 days. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry, "00 11 17" in item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018365

    Original file (20130018365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. c. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the AGCM at the time of the applicant's separation processing, based on the available evidence, and notwithstanding 2 days bad time, it would be appropriate to award the applicant this medal. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019473

    Original file (20130019473.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following corrections to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * Adding his award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * Showing no lost time in item 26a (Non-Pay Periods Time Lost) * Showing in item 30 (Remarks) that he had no lost time * Showing in item 30 that he served in Vietnam during the period 4 April 1969 – 3 April 1970 * Showing in item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) all of his foreign service * Adding...