Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018536
Original file (20080018536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  April 14, 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018536 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states that he is eligible for award of the Good Conduct Medal.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) as documentary evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 May 1971.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded the primary military occupational specialty (MOS) of 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) and the secondary MOS of 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four (SP4)/E-4.  The applicant was released from active duty on
14 February 1973 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 and subsequent DD Forms 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) does not show award of the Good Conduct Medal.

4.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he served an overseas tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 9 October 1971 through 7 August 1972.

5.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows that he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his tenure of service.

6.  The applicant's record does not contain any derogatory information or a record of a commander's disqualification for award of the Good Conduct Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal was carefully considered and found to have merit.

2.  Evidence of record shows the applicant completed a period of honorable service during which he received all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and had no convictions by a court-martial.  Additionally, there is no evidence that the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal (first award) for the period 14 May 1971 to 14 February 1973 and entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (first award) for the period 14 May 1971 to 14 February 1973; and
   
   b.  adding to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Good Conduct Medal (first award).



      __________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018536



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018536



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018529

    Original file (20080018529.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his first period of military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000832

    Original file (20100000832.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. However, there is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he actively participated in ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit, therefore, the available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003616

    Original file (20080003616.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010420

    Original file (20080010420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant received an "Excellent" conduct and efficiency rating throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019541

    Original file (20120019541.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However: * There is no derogatory information in his record that would have disqualified him from being recommended for or awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal * Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service 9. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017784

    Original file (20100017784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he received an official commendation and award of the Army Commendation Medal. The evidence of record shows the Department of the Army Certificate and DA Form 2441 are properly filed in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and to correct his DD Form214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014739

    Original file (20090014739.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Naval hospital ship, USS Sanctuary; c. his conduct and efficiency ratings are recorded as "excellent" or "unknown"; d. he served during one campaign period (Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII (1 July 1970 – 30 June 1971)); e. he received a gunshot wound to his left leg on 3 March 1971; and f. his authorized awards are listed as the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016571

    Original file (20130016571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 12 November 1969 to 20 August 1971 and correct his DD Form 214 to show this medal. Therefore, he is authorized to wear two bronze service stars on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018375

    Original file (20080018375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 173rd Airborne Brigade, General Orders Number 405, dated 23 February 1971, show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 18 February 1971 in the Republic of Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002714

    Original file (20090002714.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, item 28 (Record of Assignment) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received an excellent conduct and efficiency rating throughout his enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior,...