IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 09 OCTOBER 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080010420
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states that he was wounded in combat on 7 March 1971 with Rocket Propelled Grenade (RPG) shrapnel in the Republic of Vietnam.
3. The applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 16 September 1971; a copy of his Certificate of Retirement, dated 1 May 1973; a copy of the Office of the Adjutant General Letter Orders Number D9-169, dated 2 September 1971 (Enlisted Disability Retirement); copies of Certificate of Appreciation from the Disabled American Veterans; and a copy of s Certificate of Appreciation from the Commander in Chief, in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 July 1970. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman). The highest rank he attained during his military service was specialist four (SP4)/E-4. He was placed on the Permanent Disability Retired List (PDRL) on 17 September 1971.
3. The applicants records show he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 9 January 1971 to 13 April 1971. He was assigned to Company B, 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade.
4. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicants DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device, the Bronze Star Medal, the Parachutist Badge, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). Item 24 does not show award of the Purple Heart.
5. Headquarters, 173rd Airborne Brigade, General Orders Number 576, dated 13 March 1971, show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in connection with military operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam on 7 March 1971.
6. Review of the applicant's records indicates his entitlement to additional awards that are not shown on his DD Form 214.
7. Headquarters, 173rd Airborne Brigade, General Orders Number 829, dated 11 April 1971; show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in connection with ground operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam from January 1971 to March 1971.
8. Headquarters, 173rd Airborne Brigade, General Orders Number 925, dated 22 April 1971; show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for heroism in connection with ground operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam on 7 March 1971.
9. A review of the applicant's service record shows no derogatory information that would disqualify him for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. Additionally, Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant received an "Excellent" conduct and efficiency rating throughout his military service.
10. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The enlisted person must have had all excellent conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying. Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.
11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974 and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal-First Class Unit Citation, based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 71, dated 1973.
12. Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.
13. Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows that the applicant participated in the Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase VII, campaign during his tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam. This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. General Orders awarded the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in connection with military operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam on 7 March 1971, which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.
2. General Orders show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for heroism in connection with ground operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam on 7 March 1971, which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to have his records corrected to show this award.
3. General Orders awarded the applicants unit the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal-First Class Unit Citation, which are not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to have his records corrected to show these awards.
4. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Additionally, records show the applicant participated in one campaign while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to award of a bronze service star to be affixed to the Vietnam Service Medal.
5. Evidence of record confirms that the applicant served honorably during the period 1 July 1970 to 16 September 1971. He attained the rank of SP4, received an "Excellent" conduct and efficiency rating, and was awarded the Purple Heart. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.
BOARD VOTE:
__XXX __ __XXX__ __XXX__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 1 July 1970 to
16 September 1971;
b. deleting the entry "Bronze Star Medal";
c. showing award of the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device and 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal-First Class Unit Citation, and a bronze service star to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.
___ XXX ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080010420
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080010420
5
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004982
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Special Orders show that the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018375
Headquarters, 173rd Airborne Brigade, General Orders Number 405, dated 23 February 1971, show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 18 February 1971 in the Republic of Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013919
The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show that he was awarded two Purple Hearts, more than one Air Medal, and an Army Good Conduct Medal. Records show that the applicant participated in five campaign periods during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013752
Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence of record shows that the applicant served a qualifying period in the Republic of Vietnam for award of one Overseas Service Bar. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 22 February 1970 in the Republic of Vietnam; b. awarding the applicant the Good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088371C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22, section I provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. It is appropriate to award the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for his period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013510
He goes on to state he contacted the Military Awards Branch and was made aware that no record of his submission for the Purple Heart was recorded and he would like to correct this oversight. For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016007
The applicants records show he was issued three awards of the Good Conduct Medal, issued on miscellaneous dates, by various Headquarters, for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity, from 4 February 1967 through 3 February 1960 (1st Award); from 18 December 1961 through 17 December 1964 (2nd Award); and from 20 March 1965 through 19 March 1968 (3rd Award). Item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 23 February 1972, shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005997
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, three bronze...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001817
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) as follows: * item 17c (Date of Entry) to show 14 October 1968 vice 14 October 1950 * item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show the Purple Heart and Air Medal * item 25 (Education and Training Completed) to show his education 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076689C070215
Paragraph 2-15b provides that requests for reconsideration, which are received more than 1 year after the Board’s original consideration or after the Board has already reconsidered the case will be considered only if the staff of the Board determines that substantial relevant new evidence shows fraud, mistake of law, mathematical miscalculation, manifest error, or that there is substantial relevant new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time after the Board’s...