IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 5 March 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080018437
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 28 May 1969 to show award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states that he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for an injury he received on 18 December 1968, near Long Bihn [sic], Vietnam. The applicant states that the truck he was in struck a landmine and he was evacuated to an Army Hospital in Vung Tau, Vietnam, with a broken foot and ankle.
3. The applicant continues that a fellow Soldier was issued a Purple Heart for the same incident. The applicant states that he was told by his sergeant that he and the fellow Soldier were both recommended for the Purple Heart. He never heard anything else about it. The applicant further states that he earned the Purple Heart and it should have been awarded.
4. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame
provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army on 23 October 1967 and successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training. He was awarded military occupational specialty 67N (UH-1 Helicopter Repairman).
3. The applicant arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to the 398th Transportation Detachment, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment on or about 15 May 1968.
4. The applicant departed Vietnam on or about 27 May 1969. He was honorably released from active duty on 28 May 1969 after completing 1 year, 7 months, and 6 days of creditable active service.
5. His DD Form 214 for the ending period 28 May 1969 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Aircraft Crewman Badge.
6. There are no general orders in the applicants service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There also is no evidence that shows he was treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.
7. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the applicant was wounded and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart.
8. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart.
9. The applicant's Army Medical Treatment Records are unavailable.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows he received any injury that was a result of hostile action.
2. Regrettably, lacking any corroborating evidence of record showing the applicant was treated for a wound/injury that was the direct result of or caused by enemy action, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x____ ___x____ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
XXX
_________________________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080018437
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080018437
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003103
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He requests, through his Congressional representative, reconsideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision denying him the award of the Purple Heart. The service medical treatment record, provided by the applicant, indicates that on 5 July 1969 he was treated for a puncture wound on the bottom of his right foot and had sand debris in the wound.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020750
Standard Form 600, dated 7 November 1968, Weed Army Hospital, Fort Irwin, CA, shows the entry "suffered alleged fragment wound to right foot in June 1968 in Vietnam; nothing in records. The evidence of record shows the applicant sustained a fragment wound to his right foot in Vietnam in or around June 1968. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of corroborating evidence that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021081
There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant, which give conflicting descriptions of the alleged wounding, are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. _______ _ X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021588
He should be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 31 January 1968, at the beginning of the TET Offensive [Republic of Vietnam], which were not reported. c. He was wounded during the attack when he was pushed to the cement sidewalk while running to his assigned bunker and sustained injuries to his right leg, including deep lacerations, blood loss, and bruising. His DD Form 214 shows he was credited with the completion of 3 years, 10 months, and 20 days of total active...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008220
There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The Purple Heart requires: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002812
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002812 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The medical records, dated between 1981 and 1987, and provided by the applicant do not show his ear problems were the result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam the statement the applicant provided from a fellow Soldier was not sufficient as a basis...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011918
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Purple Heart. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart: * Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound or injury * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not list the Purple Heart as an authorized...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004811
He provided the following documents: a. a personal letter, dated May 1986, in which he stated he was "put in" for a Purple Heart and he stated a piece of metal shrapnel hit him in the back. Unfortunately, his memory does not recall particular dates and details; however, he did, for a number days, clean and dress an infected wound to the applicant's lower back while they served in M Platoon, Company A performing combat duties. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009909
There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders, his medical records, or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Regrettably, there is insufficient...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014156
There is no evidence in the available records which show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant provides a letter of support, dated 16 February 2008, from a Soldier who served with him in the Republic of Vietnam. In the absence of any other evidence which shows the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the...