Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018151
Original file (20080018151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       3 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018151 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he sustained an injury while on active duty.

2.  The applicant states he had polio as a child but pre-service surgery completely corrected this problem.  The injury that resulted in his release from active duty occurred as a result of unloading lumber during a training exercise.

3.  The applicant reports that at age 2 he contracted paralytic polio.  At age 12 he underwent surgical intervention to correct the orthopedic problems that resulted from the polio.  He played both football and baseball in high school and soccer in college.  At the time he enlisted he underwent a thorough medical examination and was found fit for enlistment.  

4.  The applicant provides a personal statement and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 July 1961.  He completed basic training and was assigned to Fort Gordon for training as a military policeman.

3.  On 6 November 1961, the applicant signed a form letter wherein he requested discharge for a physical disability that existed prior to 31 July 1961, the date of his enlistment.

4.  The available record includes a copy of a coversheet indicating that a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceeding was approved on 22 November 1961.  Attempts to locate the actual MEB proceedings have met with negative results.

5.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 24 November 1961 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40A (Physical Evaluation For Retention, Retirement, Or Separation), paragraph 6, for a physical disability that existed prior to service.  He had 3 months and 24 days of creditable service.

6.  The applicant's service medical records are not associated with the available file.

7.  Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions regarding an applicant’s request for the correction of a military record.  In pertinent part, it states that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he had polio as a child but pre-service surgery completely corrected this problem.  The injury that resulted in his release from active duty occurred as a result of unloading lumber during a training exercise.

2.  The applicant's service medical records are not associated with the available file.  It is probable that they are either nonexistent or on permanent loan to the Department of Veterans Affairs and are not available for review.  Without the applicant's service medical records and/or the MEB proceedings, it is impossible to determine if the condition that resulted in his discharge was a preexisting condition, an injury that aggravated a preexisting condition, or an injury that was incurred independent of any preexisting condition.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4.  Without the medical records the Board must apply the presumption of administrative regularity in the processing of the applicant's discharge.  There is nothing in the available records or in anything submitted by the applicant to overcome that presumption.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018151



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018151



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009805

    Original file (20130009805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests reconsideration of an earlier request for payment of a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity to him, as a disabled adult, based on the death of his father and mother, the beneficiary of the FSM's SBP annuity. The applicant provided numerous medical records which show: * on 24 May 1954, at age 2, he was diagnosed with spinal poliomyelitis, recovered with residual paralysis in muscles of both legs * he walked with braces...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021336

    Original file (20140021336.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the disability rating he received from the physical evaluation board (PEB) on 2 July 2009 included a 10 percent (%) disability rating for his right shoulder and, as a result, he was granted a total disability rating of 70% vice 60%. He provides a VA Rating Decision, dated 17 December 2009, wherein it shows, in part, that effective 16 December 2009 he was granted service­connected disability for: * PTSD (also claimed as insomnia) -...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015966

    Original file (20130015966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, the narrative reason and separation program designator (SPD) code shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to reflect that he was discharged for medical reasons so he can receive medical benefits. He advised the applicant that the final decision in his case rested with the separation authority and if his separation was approved, his service would be characterized as honorable. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00269

    Original file (PD2009-00269.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    His neck and shoulder pain and numbness and weakness in both upper extremities, right greater than left, continued and he was unable to work in his civilian job in the lumber mill after he was released from active duty in late November 2006. The Informal PEB determined in January 2008 that he was unfit for continued military service and he was then separated with a combined total of 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01521

    Original file (PD 2012 01521.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A final PEB revised for an administrative correction dated 18 March 2003 adjudicated the chronic pain, left knee condition as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USPDA) pain policy. By rating decision 15 March 2004, the VA rated the condition 30% based on the partial knee replacement surgery after separation (coded 5055). RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001456

    Original file (20110001456.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show the additional 20-percent disability rating for his right ankle condition is combat-related. He also provides a letter, dated 4 January 2011, from a podiatry consultant who states "upon review of the medial reports and magnetic resonance imaging comparing to the x-rays of the right foot and ankle he had performed in 2003 is not related to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021436

    Original file (20110021436.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress, payment of a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity to him, as a disabled adult, based on the death of his father, a former service member (FSM) and his mother, the beneficiary of the FSM's SBP annuity. Once she died, the annuity payment she had been receiving since the FSM's death on 20 September 2004 stopped. The Member of Congress provides: * Letter, dated 23 February 2009, from DFAS - Retired and Annuity Pay * Applicant's statement *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064312C070421

    Original file (2001064312C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that the applicant was not wounded as a result of hostile action therefore, there is insufficient evidence to award the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 26 January 1945.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004138

    Original file (20110004138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his records be screened by a medical evaluation board (MEB) and physical evaluation board (PEB), correction of his discharge to show medical retirement, and correction of his initial enlistment date on active duty. The applicant provides: * DD Form 2246 (Applicant Medical Prescreening) * extract of his military medical records * unsigned copy of a DA Form 4707 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * extract of his VA medical records *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014378C070206

    Original file (20050014378C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    This document shows that the proceedings of a Board of Medical Officers convened on 18 July 1944. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was injured as a result of an accident on 7 July 1944 when he suffered a fracture of his left tibia and fibula. There is no official documentary evidence in the applicant's military service records that supports the contention that he sustained a wound as a result of hostile action or was treated for such wound by a medical officer.