Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018010
Original file (20080018010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        22 JANUARY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018010 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he received shrapnel wounds to the right leg in Vietnam, while assigned to D Company, 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment.  He goes on to state that no paperwork was prepared at the time and that the medic treated him at the time and he refused to be evacuated.  He further states that he continued to battle the enemy because he did not want his family to know he was injured. 

3.  The applicant provides statements from four individuals who claim that they served with the applicant in Vietnam and witnessed his being wounded.  One of the individuals claims to have been the medic.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in Detroit, Michigan on 28 November 1969 for a period of 3 years under the basic training buddy plan.  He completed his basic training at Fort Knox, Kentucky; his advanced individual training at Fort Ord, California; and his airborne training at Fort Benning, Georgia.  Upon completion of training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) with a Special Qualification Identifier of "P" to indicate parachutist qualified.  He was subsequently transferred to Vietnam on 22 September 1970 and assigned to Company D, 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade.

3.  He departed Vietnam with his unit on 17 August 1971 and was transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 14 March 1973, due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He had served 3 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal Unit Citation.

4.  A review of the applicant's records and the Vietnam Casualty Listing fails to reveal any indication that the applicant was either wounded or that he was reported as wounded/injured.

5.  The third party statements provided by the applicant with his application indicate that they all recall the applicant being wounded when another member stepped on an anti-personnel mine and that the applicant was treated and remained with the unit.  The individual who served as a medic claims that he did treat the applicant and that the applicant requested not to be medically evacuated.  He also states that it was his fault that the treatment was not made a matter of record.

6.  On 13 March 2006, in response to a congressional inquiry on behalf of the applicant, officials at the Military Awards Branch, Human Resources Command - Alexandria, Virginia informed the Member of Congress that there was no evidence in the available records and the Vietnam casualty files that showed that the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action or that treatment for such injuries had been made a matter of record.  The officials at the Human Resources Command advised the congressional representative that the applicant could request a search of morning reports that may provide information relating to the event in question or possibly obtain medical documents from the Department of Veterans Affairs that would confirm his treatment of such wounds/injuries.  He was further informed that the applicant should submit such evidence to that office when obtained.

7.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart or any additional individual awards earned during his tour in Vietnam and not already noted on his DD Form 214.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he was wounded as a result of enemy action is not in doubt, to qualify for award of the Purple Heart, there must be sufficient evidence to show that the individual was in fact wounded/injured as a result of enemy action and that treatment for such wounds was made a matter of record.  

2.  In addition to the requirements outlined above, it is also noted that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound/injury incurred on a specific date; however, no specific date can be established from the available evidence.  This is especially difficult given the passage of time (38+ years).

3.  Therefore, in the absence of sufficient evidence to establish his entitlement to award of the Purple Heart, there appears to be no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ________XXX______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018010



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018010



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021546

    Original file (20140021546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 November 1969, he was transferred to Fort Knox, Kentucky where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 20 January 1971 due to the expiration of his term of service. There is also no evidence of his being awarded the Purple Heart. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he was wounded as a result of enemy action and that treatment was made a matter of record, there appears to be no basis for granting his request for a Purple Heart at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003865

    Original file (20080003865.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For wounded Soldiers requiring hospitalization in excess of 24 hours or medical evacuation from Vietnam, the authority to award the Purple Heart was delegated to hospital commanders. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006216

    Original file (20110006216.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of his official records failed to show any evidence to show that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action or that treatment for such injuries were made a matter of record. However, the applicant did serve in two campaigns in Vietnam and thus is entitled to wear two bronze service stars on his already awarded VSM. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008756

    Original file (20070008756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the "Annual Supplement to the History of the 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade (Separate)" dated January to March 1967; three separate 4th Battalion (Airborne), 503rd Infantry Combat After Action Reports dated 17 March 1967, 13 April 1967 and 5 May 1967; and two personal witness statements in support of his application. Item 24 (Decorations, Medal, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010189

    Original file (20120010189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He served in Vietnam as infantryman from August 1969 to June 1970; he was assigned as a platoon sergeant to A Company, 3rd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade * Between August and October 1969, he was wounded; his unit received small arms fire during a patrol; he dropped to the ground near a rock when a bullet hit the rock next to his hand and fragments injured his hand * After the shooting stopped, a medic examined his wound and gave him a topical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009806

    Original file (20100009806.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of his records shows that he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of any action by the commander to prevent him from being awarded the AGCM. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears the applicant should have received the AGCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009052

    Original file (20100009052.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on his combat service in the Republic of Vietnam and subsequent award of the Purple Heart for combat wounds, it appears reasonable to believe that the applicant, who served in MOS 11B1P and in an infantry unit, was actively engaged with enemy ground forces when he encountered an enemy booby trap. General orders announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the 2nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001008

    Original file (20150001008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was wounded in Vietnam is not in doubt, there is insufficient evidence to warrant award of the Purple Heart at this time. _____________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007331

    Original file (20100007331.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A copy of a DA Form 2658, dated on various dates through his military service, shows he received medical services at the 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry aid station on 29 August 1969. b. His record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds, his available medical records do...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023038

    Original file (20120023038.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * a self-authored memoir of what occurred before, during, and after his Saigon trip * a statement of support from another individual * Congressional correspondence * DD Form 214 * Honorable Discharge Certificate * Discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * Letter of appreciation * Court Order for change of name * Statement in support of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) claim * Letter from the National Personnel Records Center CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1....