Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017542
Original file (20080017542.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       19 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080017542 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he changed his election for Survivor Benefit Plan coverage from spouse to former spouse.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was divorced in 2002.  He further contends that he was not briefed at the time of his retirement briefing in 1997 about the possible requirement to provide for former spousal coverage.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his marriage license and certificate, SBP election form (DD Form 2656), and his divorce judgment with separation agreement (partial copy).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 11 June 1973, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He subsequently served through a series of enlistments and assignments until his retirement on 30 June 1997, based on sufficient length of service.  He had attained the rank of master sergeant, pay grade E-8, and had completed 24 years and 20 days of creditable active duty service.

3.  On 2 July 1975, the applicant married R____ E____.  

4.  On 27 March 1997, the applicant elected SBP coverage for his spouse based on his full gross retirement pay.  His spouse concurred with his election.   She signed and dated the DD Form 2656 on 27 March 1997.

5.  The applicant's divorce judgment, dated 6 March 2001, ordered that the separation agreement between him and his former spouse entered into on 
22 January 2001, be incorporated into the Judgment for Absolute Divorce as if it were fully set out therein.

6.  Page 6, of what appears to be a part of the separation agreement, states, in effect, that the applicant will enroll his former spouse in the SBP as beneficiary and that this designation is irrevocable.  The applicant was further required to verify annually to his former spouse that she is the beneficiary.  The applicant was to be fully responsible for the payment of the SBP out of his military retirement pay.  Both the applicant and former spouse signed the agreement.   

7.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  

8.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members, including Reservists.

9.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his SBP election should be changed to show his former spouse as beneficiary.

2.  The evidence clearly shows that the applicant elected full coverage for his spouse at the time of his retirement and that his spouse at the time concurred.  His subsequent divorce requires him to retain his former spouse as the irrevocable beneficiary of his SBP.   

3.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be granted.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that his former spouse is the beneficiary for his Survivor Benefit Plan.







      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017542





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017542



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008440

    Original file (20080008440.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant further submits a notarized statement, dated 24 April 2008, wherein his current spouse concurred with the correction of his records to provide SBP benefits to his former spouse. On 10 July 1991, the applicant elected to provide an SBP annuity to his former spouse, who was at the time, his current spouse. In 2006, the applicant elected SBP coverage participation for his "Spouse Only" for coverage for his current spouse; however, this election was of no effect because he had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018050

    Original file (20140018050.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She provides: * Self-authored statement * State of Michigan, Military Qualifying Court Order, dated 10 January 2013 * State of Michigan, Divorce Decree, dated 23 June 2011 * DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Certificate), dated 22 August 1994 * DFAS letter, dated 7 February 2013 * Orders P10-815755, dated 8 October 2008 * DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits), dated 25 February 2008 * AHRC Form 249-2-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), dated 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013941

    Original file (20130013941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Once he became aware of the requirement, he submitted a DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage), but the change was denied because it was made outside of the 1-year period following the divorce. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show his election for former spouse SBP coverage was received and processed in a timely manner.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013941

    Original file (20130013941 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Once he became aware of the requirement, he submitted a DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage), but the change was denied because it was made outside of the 1-year period following the divorce. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show his election for former spouse SBP coverage was received and processed in a timely manner.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013941 (2)

    Original file (20130013941 (2).txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Once he became aware of the requirement, he submitted a DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage), but the change was denied because it was made outside of the 1-year period following the divorce. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show his election for former spouse SBP coverage was received and processed in a timely manner.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003140

    Original file (20110003140.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service record is void of evidence which indicates the FSM or the applicant made a deemed election to change his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage within 1 year of the divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. However, there is no evidence which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001910

    Original file (20070001910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he remarried and added his present spouse as his SBP beneficiary in 2005, DFAS dropped the SBP election. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, filed 13 December 2002; a copy of their Marital Settlement Agreement, dated 9 October 2002; a copy of a letter the applicant wrote to DFAS, Subject: Correct My Mistake, dated 16 June 2006; a copy of a DD Form 2656-9, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and Reserve Component Survivor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004491

    Original file (20140004491.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The FSM and applicant were divorced on 26 September 2012. Unfortunately, there is no evidence the FSM changed his SBP coverage to "former spouse" coverage or the applicant deemed the election within one year of her divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016638

    Original file (20110016638.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 May 1991 the applicant submitted his DD Form 1883 electing full spouse and children coverage under option C for immediate coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The applicant made an irrevocable RCSBP election for full spouse and children coverage in 1991 and after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007441

    Original file (20140007441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the record of her former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show her as the former spouse beneficiary for the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits. The available records do not show the FSM made a voluntary election to change his SBP election from spouse and child to former spouse coverage within 1 year after their divorce or that the applicant requested a deemed election of former spouse coverage within that same period of...