Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016863
Original file (20080016863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	      24 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080016863 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her military records to show that she was retired due to physical disability.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that she was injured while on active duty.  However, she contends that many of her medical problems were not addressed prior to her discharge.  She states that her medical problems included asthma, back injury, sarcoidosis of the lung, gynecological problems, borderline hypertension, migraines, heart problems, ankle fracture, back problems, borderline diabetes during pregnancy, right arm injury, and tendonitis.

3.  The applicant provides no documentation in support of her application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 28 January 1986, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  She completed her initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 75D (Personnel Records Specialist).

3.  The applicant performed duty as a personnel records specialist with the Regional Personnel Center in the Federal Republic of Germany from 26 June 
1986 to her return to the United States on or about 14 June 1988.

4.  On 25 July 1988, the applicant was assigned for duty as a personnel records specialist with the 4th Personnel Services Company, Fort Carson, Colorado.

5.  On 26 January 1990, the applicant reenlisted for another 3 years.

6.  On 26 October 1990, the applicant sustained a traumatic injury to her right shoulder while lifting a file cabinet.  She reported to sick call the next day and was subsequently referred to the hospital outpatient department.  X-rays were taken and she was referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation.  She was diagnosed with a severe tendonitis or partial tear, displacement of the distal clavicle, and fluid in the joint and surrounding the tendon of the long head of the biceps.  She was placed on a physical profile that provided for no physical fitness training, no lifting, and no overhead work.

7.  During the period from 15 March 1991 to 16 June 1991, the applicant was hospitalized for extensive physical therapy.  This program did not result in any significant improvement of her medical condition.

8.  On 28 April 1992, a medical evaluation board (MEBD) convened to evaluate the medical condition of the applicant.  It found that she had the following medical conditions:  severe chronic right shoulder pain, chronic tendonitis, chronic bursitis of the right shoulder, and prophylactic anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy.  The MEBD recommended that she be referred to a physical evaluation board (PEB).  The applicant did not present any views on her own behalf.  She indicated that she did not desire to continue on active duty.  The findings and recommendation of the MEBD were approved.  The applicant signed the MEBD findings and recommendation but did not indicate agreement or disagreement.

9.  On 2 June 1992, a PEB convened to consider the applicant’s medical condition.  It found that she suffered from chronic pain of the right shoulder with tendonitis and bursitis, rated at 20 percent disabling.  The diagnosis of prophylactic anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy was found to be not unfitting and not ratable.  The PEB found the applicant to be physically unfit and recommended a combined disability rating of 20 percent and that she be separated with severance pay, if otherwise qualified.  The applicant concurred and waived a formal hearing.  The applicant was counseled as to her legal rights pertaining     to the PEB.  Both the applicant and counselor signed the proceedings on            5 June 1992.

10.  Accordingly, on 1 July 1992, the applicant was discharged due to physical disability and awarded severance pay.  She had attained the rank of specialist, pay grade E-4, and had completed 6 years, 5 months, and 4 days of creditable active duty service.

11.  The applicant's service medical records were not available for review.

12.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), appendix B (Army Application of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities), paragraph B-3f, provides that conditions which do not render a Soldier unfit for military service will not be considered in determining the compensable disability rating unless the conditions contribute to the finding of unfitness.

13.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his or her office, rank, grade, or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

14.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has an impairment rated at least 30 percent disabling.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that she should be granted a medical retirement based on her medical condition at the time of her discharge.  She further contends that all of her medical conditions were not evaluated at the time.

2.  The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant was medically disabled and was evaluated by an MEBD and PEB.  The MEBD found only her shoulder pain with tendonitis and bursitis and her prophylactic anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy to be medically unacceptable and referred her to the PEB.  The PEB found only her shoulder pain with tendonitis and bursitis to be medically unfitting for military service and recommended separation with a 20 percent disability rating.  The applicant was counseled regarding her legal rights.  She concurred with the findings and recommendation of the PEB and waived a formal hearing.  Accordingly, she was discharged with severance pay.

3.  The applicant has not provided any documentary evidence to substantiate her claim that the Army did not properly evaluate all of her medical conditions.  Furthermore, she concurred with the PEB findings and recommendation.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

5.  In view of the above, the applicant’s request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016863



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016863



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014685

    Original file (20100014685.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB found the applicant unfit due to tendonitis, chronic of the left supraspinatus tendon, left patellar tendon, and the left Achilles tendon, rated at 10 percent disabling. Whether the decision to deny service connection for left patellar tendonitis and left shoulder bursitis was clearly and unmistakably erroneous. The available documentary evidence, provided by the applicant, shows the VA reevaluated his medical conditions in October 2000 and granted 10 percent disability ratings for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010979

    Original file (20110010979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    MEB Proceedings he provided in support of his previous application show, on 29 December 1992, an MEB diagnosed him to have chronic tendonitis of the left supraspinatus tendon, left patellar tendon, and left Achilles tendon, and recommended that he be referred to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). f. A VA Rating Decision, dated 28 September 2004, showing he was granted service-connection for: (1) left shoulder tendonitis rated at 20% from 1 May 2000. The available records show no evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013452

    Original file (20090013452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. His clinical records, laboratory findings, and physical examinations (his entire medical records) were subsequently considered by an MEBD which recommended he be given a PEB. It also provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years service and a disability rating at less than 30 percent.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019126

    Original file (20080019126.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was rated under the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and was granted a 10 percent disability rating for code 5241 (chronic low back pain), a 10 percent disability rating for codes 5099 and 5003 (chronic pain of the left shoulder and left knee), and a 10 percent disability rating for codes 5030 and 5261 (flexion contracture of the right knee). Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058583C070421

    Original file (2001058583C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That she had a compression fracture from an injury that she received in Kuwait. An 8 June 2001 VA medical record shows that she was receiving a 60 percent disability rating for neck and back pain, that the applicant stated that her problem had been progressively getting worse. Physical evaluation boards are established to evaluate all cases of physical disability equitability for the soldier and the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03093578C070212

    Original file (03093578C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he received a 10 percent disability rating for his shoulder condition and a 10 percent disability rating for his eye condition from the Army. Both physicians noted that according to VASRD rating code 5202 the applicant’s right shoulder warranted a 30 percent rating while one physician also stated that the applicant’s left shoulder could be rated at 20 percent under code 5202. Unlike the VA, the Army must first determine whether or not a soldier is fit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008169

    Original file (20090008169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was rated under the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) codes 5099 and 5003 (chronic right knee pain) and was granted a 10-percent disability rating. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before he or she can be medically retired or separated. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01440

    Original file (PD 2012 01440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Trochanteric Bursitis, left & right hip – very hard to get sleep at night; also hard to stand or sit for prolonged periods of time.” SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00090

    Original file (PD2012-00090.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Complaints of right shoulder pain, back pain, and knee pain were noted, but not ankle pain. At the MEB examination, the examiner recorded no limitation in ROM and normal strength of the right shoulder. It was noted that PT was beneficial and that the second C&P documented essentially normal ROM for the hip.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02128

    Original file (PD-2013-02128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On exam there was TTP of the neck with negative testing for nervecompression (Spurling’s), with normal ROM and normal bilateral UE examination.At the MEB examination on 21 October 2004, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported chronic neck pain without radicular symptoms. The NARSUM notes the CI had a history of hip pain (trochanteric bursitis), with normal bilateral hip X-rays.Notes in the STR indicated that in April 2000 the CI reported 5 weeks of right hip pain. At the MEB...