Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016539
Original file (20080016539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        31 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080016539


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his reentry eligibility (RE) code be upgraded to one that will allow him to reenlist.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he has a heart murmur.  This caused his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 5-11, by reason of "failed medical/physical/procurement standards."  He would like to rejoin the Army, but he needs a more favorable RE code.  He adds that a civilian doctor has given him an endorsement.

3.  The applicant provides a letter from a civilian physician from the City of Philadelphia, Department of Public Health, dated 1 July 2008.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve Delayed Entry Program (DEP) for 8 years on 17 July 2006.  On 3 October 2006, he was discharged from the DEP and he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 4 October 2006.

2.  The applicant was transferred to Fort Jackson, SC, for initial entry training.  At Fort Jackson he was diagnosed with medical problems and was determined not to meet medical/physical procurement standards.  After only 2 months and 5 days of active service, he was discharged for failing to meet medical/physical procurement standards and given a separation program designator (SPD) code of "JFW" and an RE code of "3."

3.  A City of Philadelphia public health doctor stated the Army rejected the applicant because of trace mitral valve regurgitation, trace pulmonary regurgitation, and trace tricuspid regurgitation.  The civilian doctor found only a slight cardiac murmur at the sterna border.  The civilian doctor recommended the applicant be allowed to enlist.

4.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlisting and processing into the RA and the eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment.  This regulation includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes and RA RE codes.  A separation code of "JFW" applies to persons whose physical condition does not meet procurement requirements.  An RE code of RE-3 applies to such persons.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his RE code.

2.  There is no error or injustice associated with the applicant's RE code.  He was separated under the authority of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11.  This separation authority carries an SPD code of "JFW" and an RE code of "3."  This RE code makes him ineligible to reenlist; however, the ineligibility is waivable.

3.  The applicant provided civilian medical evidence that indicates he should be able to serve in the military without medical problems.  The applicant should take his medical documentation to a recruiter and ask the recruiter to file a waiver to permit him to reenlist.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


																XXX
      _________________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016539



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016539



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000639

    Original file (20150000639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty, active duty training, or initial entry training, will be separated. A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00979

    Original file (PD2010-00979.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    BAV and chest pain (exertion related) were the only conditions on the MEB’s submission to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr. XXXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of separation or in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000692

    Original file (20150000692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 11, EPTS [existed prior to service], by reason of palpitations. The available evidence shows he was treated/seen in 2007 and 2010, for heart palpitations that occurred when he was 9 years old, and he did not mention this episode or treatments at the time of his enlistment. The evidence of record shows the proper RE code for Soldiers separated under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020170

    Original file (20140020170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings), dated 11 July 2012, shows he was diagnosed as having chronic right shoulder pain which existed prior to service based on a right shoulder injury while playing baseball in 2009. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by the appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the Soldier’s initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019466

    Original file (20090019466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table in effect at the time established the RE code of 3 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11 for failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002399

    Original file (20140002399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a: * 4 February 2010 letter from a doctor in the Boston Medical Center stating the applicant did not have any kidney stones that day * 28 December 2011 Boston University Urology Department letter stating the applicant was seen on 4 February 2010 and had no kidney stones * page 10 of enlistment documents showing his enlistment included an enlistment bonus, SLRP, and the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) * 5 January 2012 Clinical Record showing a medical waiver had been...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006600

    Original file (AR20130006600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a DD Form 293, dated 25 March 2013. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011528

    Original file (20140011528.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, his record contains false statements saying he attempted suicide and received psychiatric care while still in high school. After seeing the doctors he was given a profile, put on "buddy watch," told he could not be around weapons, and was removed from all training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003447

    Original file (20120003447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120003447 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. He was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11, and was properly issued a separation code of “JFW” and an RE Code of "3" in accordance with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019768

    Original file (20110019768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier’s initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at the time, and the medical condition does not...