Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016502
Original file (20080016502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        26 FEBRUARY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080016502 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that her WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) be corrected to reflect her date of birth (DOB) as 25 September 1923. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that her DOB is actually 25 September 1923 and that her WD AGO Form 53-55 reflects it as 25 October 1923.  She goes on to state that at the time she served her birth certificate reflected her DOB as 25 October 1923; however, she has subsequently had her birth certificate corrected to reflect the correct DOB of 25 September 1923.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her corrected birth certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Women's Army Corps (WAC) of the Army of the United States (AUS) in Montgomery, Alabama on 17 November 1944 and entered active duty on 29 November 1944.  She completed her training as a medical technician and was transferred to the 62nd WAC Hospital Company at O'Reilly General Hospital in Springfield, Missouri.  She attained the rank of Technician Fifth Grade (T/5).

4.  On 4 June 1946, the applicant was honorably discharged at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.  She had served 1 year, 6 months and 6 days of total active service.  Her WD AGO Form 53-55 issued at the time of her discharge indicates that her DOB was 25 October 1923.

5.  The corrected birth certificate provided by the applicant with her application shows that on 9 October 2008, the Arkansas Department of Health, Division of Vital Records, issued an Affidavit for Correction of a Record in which it changed the applicant's month of birth from October to September.  The documents used to support the change were an insurance policy and a burial policy indicating that her DOB is 25 September 1923.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  At the time of the applicant's service, her DOB was listed as 25 October 1923 and that is the date that was entered on her WD AGO Form 53-55. 

2.  While the applicant has obtained a corrected birth certificate, she did so using an insurance policy and a burial policy.  While the policies may be sufficient proof for a State to change a DOB on a birth certificate, more definitive proof is required to change an Army record. 

3.  There is no evidence that suggests the applicant has or would suffer any injury or injustice as a result of the Army maintaining its records with the DOB under which she served.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  

4.  While it is clear that the applicant now wishes to record what she claims is her correct DOB in her military records, this is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army's records at this late date.

5.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with her application and the supporting evidence she provided, which confirms that her current DOB is 25 September 1923, will be filed in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the DOB recorded in her military records and to satisfy her desire to have what she claims is her correct DOB documented in her OMPF.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during World War II.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of her service in arms.



      _______ _ XXX  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016502



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                      AR20080016502


3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005700

    Original file (20110005700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show his date of birth (DOB) as "12 August 1923" instead of "12 January 1922." This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's military records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006240

    Original file (20090006240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation and Honorable Discharge) for the period ending 8 January 1946 to show his correct date of birth (DOB), correct date of induction, and correct date of entry into active service. Item 10 (Date of Birth) of his WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was born on 24 August 1924. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001500

    Original file (20130001500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation honorable Discharge) and a Certificate of Birth CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. Absent any other official evidence from the applicant's military record to corroborate his claim that the DOB listed on his WD AGO Form 53-55 contains an error, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis upon which to grant the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021824

    Original file (20110021824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110021824 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states the year of his date of birth (DOB) is 1923 and not 1924 as is listed on the WD AGO Form 53-55. While the applicant’s desire to have the records changed to reflect the DOB listed on the birth certificate he now provides is understood, there is no indication he questioned the DOB at any time during his military service, or at the time he was separated from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002381C070206

    Original file (20050002381C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Carol Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant provides sufficient evidence to show the FSM was born on 21 December 1923.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006003

    Original file (20120006003.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her deceased husband's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge), a former service member (FSM), to show his year of birth as "1922" instead of "1923." The applicant's contention that the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected to change his year of birth from "1923" to "1922" was carefully considered. Although the FSM's year of birth appears as "1923" on the WD AGO Form 53-55 issued to him at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001566

    Original file (20150001566.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150001566 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show his date of birth (DOB) as 7 September 1923 vice 1924. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011239

    Original file (20130011239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * birth certificate * Honorable Discharge Certificate * WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) for the period ending 29 June 1945 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003743

    Original file (20140003743.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military record to show his correct date of birth (DOB). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003629

    Original file (20080003629.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned by corrected by providing an appropriate document to correct the applicant’s date of birth currently reflected on his WD AGO Form 100 to read 20 February 1923. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.