Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015882
Original file (20080015882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        12 FEBRUARY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080015882 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that her military records be corrected to show that she elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that when she submitted her paperwork for retirement pay in the spring of 2007, she specifically noted that she did not wish to participate in the SBP.  She contends that she had been married less than a year, that her marriage was strained, that her husband refused to sign the documents, and that her military career preceded her marriage to him.  She points out that on her original retirement documents there was no beneficiary noted.  However, when she received her first retired pay check, the SBP was subtracted.  She indicates that she was divorced on 1 May 2008 and that she has not seen her ex-husband since 13 May 2007 when he left her bedside in the trauma unit at the local medical center following a domestic accident.  She contends that her ex-husband only cared about the money and the benefits that he anticipated from her retirement.  She also requests that the monies taken from her pay for the first year of eligibility be refunded.   

3.  The applicant provides a letter, dated 6 May 2008, she wrote to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS); a copy of her Retiree Account Statement, dated 30 May 2007; and a copy of her final Judgment for Dissolution of Marriage in support of her application.




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 24 May 1947.  Having prior enlisted service, she was appointed a Reserve officer in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 
10 December 1968.  She was promoted to lieutenant colonel in the USAR on 
14 March 1986.     

2.  On 5 May 1990, the applicant received her notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (her 20-year letter).  Paragraph 3 of this letter pertains to the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) and the DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) and informed her that she had 90 calendar days from the date she received the letter to submit her DD Form 1883 or she would not be allowed to obtain SBP coverage until she applied for retired pay at age 60.  It appears she did not return the DD Form 1883.

3.  The applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 25 September 1997.

4.  The applicant married on 26 November 2005.

5.  The applicant’s DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 3 May 2007, shows she is married.  Section IX (Survivor Benefit Plan Election) on her DD Form 2656 is blank.  Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence (Required when member is married and elects children only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage)) on this form is blank.  Section X (Remarks) states, "Though married, I have opted out of the SBP.  I have been married to my husband for only one year and am currently estranged from him - my husband is unwilling to sign this document.  He is self-sufficient and covered by his own retirement plan so this will not present him with a financial burden.  I have no other dependents."

6.  The applicant divorced on 1 May 2008.  He former husband was not awarded SBP. 

7.  The applicant provided a letter, dated 8 May 2008, she wrote to DFAS enclosing a copy of her divorce decree requesting a change in marital status, and requesting a review of SBP assessments to date.  Based on this letter, DFAS appears to have suspended the SBP collections.  

8.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  

9.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse's written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's contentions were considered.  However, it appears she was automatically enrolled in the SBP for spouse coverage since she was married and could not provide spousal concurrence to her declination of coverage, as required by law, at the time she submitted her DD Form 2656 on 3 May 2007.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.   

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

______X__  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  XXX _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015882





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015882



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018474

    Original file (20110018474 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. she declined SBP coverage when she completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) on 10 June 2010; b. upon receiving her retirement pay a few months ago, she realized the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) deducted $102.00 for SBP cost; c. the DFAS provided that her record showed she completed an election of coverage for her husband in 1991; d. she divorced her husband Mr. K______ B______ in 1993 and remarried her current husband in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002540

    Original file (20090002540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she declined participation in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and that she receive reimbursement for any and all deductions from her retirement pay. The 20-Year Letter, dated 28 July 2004, also stated that "NOTE: Public Law 106-398, 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of this Letter, a qualified Reserve Component member, who is married, will automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017903

    Original file (20090017903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show that within one year of her marriage she elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with spouse only coverage at the full base rate. DFAS records show that: a. the applicant's letter and marriage certificate were received on 29 April 2008, b. DFAS sent her a DD Form 2656 on 19 June 2008, c. on 24 June 2009, DFAS received the applicant's DD Form 2656 but did not process it because it was received more than a year after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011766

    Original file (20130011766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel provides copies of the following documents: * FSM's Chronological Statement of Retirement Points * FSM's Death Certificate * Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage * Mediation Agreement * 20-year letter * email messages, dated March 2013 * Military Pension Division Order * former attorney's letter to DFAS, dated 28 December 2009 * extract of DODFMR 7000.14-R * HRC letter, dated 19 January 2012 * applicant's Application for Survivor Annuity, dated 30 January 2012 * HRC letter,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023390

    Original file (20110023390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 343-072 (Retired Reserve) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23B (Army National Guard (ARNG) Retirement Points History Statement) * Letters from her divorce attorney * Superior Court of the State of New York, County of Orange, Court Order – Acceptance for Processing and Amended Court Order – Acceptable for Processing * Correspondence with and from DFAS * DD Form 2656-10 (SBP/RCSBP Request for Deemed Election) * Copies of certified mail receipts * Letter from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017316

    Original file (20090017316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) be terminated and that he be reimbursed all SBP premiums deducted from his retired pay. In a 9 April 2010 email, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) informed a staff member of the following: * The applicant had named N____ L. S________ as his spouse and beneficiary in his SBP election * The retired pay system reflects SBP spouse coverage based on full gross pay for N_____ L. S_________ * Letter received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001910

    Original file (20070001910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he remarried and added his present spouse as his SBP beneficiary in 2005, DFAS dropped the SBP election. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, filed 13 December 2002; a copy of their Marital Settlement Agreement, dated 9 October 2002; a copy of a letter the applicant wrote to DFAS, Subject: Correct My Mistake, dated 16 June 2006; a copy of a DD Form 2656-9, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and Reserve Component Survivor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013584

    Original file (20100013584.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the record of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he elected spouse coverage based on full retired pay under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant states the FSM elected children-only RCSBP coverage when he retired from the U.S. Army Reserve in 1987 and did not have a spouse at that time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012764

    Original file (20100012764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter also advised her that she must notify the USAR Personnel Command, using DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), of her decision within 90 days of the date of the letter. Public Law 106-398, dated 30 October 2000, required Reserve and Guard members, who had completed their service obligation, considered entitled for retired pay, but who are not yet age 60, to obtain their spouse's concurrence in RCSBP elections that do not provide maximum spouse coverage (immediate option). As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004993

    Original file (20120004993.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his spouse and children based on his full retired pay vice a reduced amount. b. SBP Spouse Concurrence Statement, dated 8 September 1999, wherein it stated the FSM elected SBP coverage for spouse and children with a base amount of $462.00, which was less than full retired pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...