Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017316
Original file (20090017316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090017316 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) be terminated and that he be reimbursed all SBP premiums deducted from his retired pay.  

2.  The applicant states the following:

* He enrolled in the SBP for his spouse
* He has recently found out he was not legally married to N____ L. W_____
* SBP premiums have been deducted from his retired pay
* N____ L. W_____ will not be eligible for an SBP annuity if he passes away
* He has no current beneficiary 

3.  The applicant provides a letter from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, dated 31 August 2009, in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 16 February 1948.  He married his first wife on 18 January 1975 and they were divorced in June 1977.  

2.  The applicant completed prior active and inactive service and he enlisted in the Army National Guard on 7 March 1984.  



3.  The applicant’s notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (20-Year Letter) is dated 13 January 1993.    

4.  On 19 June 1993, the applicant completed a DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) and enrolled in the RCSBP for dependent child coverage only, full base amount, Option A (Defer).  His RCSBP Election Certificate indicates he was not married at the time of his election.  

5.  The applicant was released from the Army National Guard and assigned to the Retired Reserve effective 1 October 1993.

6.  On 25 July 2007, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) and elected SBP for spouse only coverage.  Block 27 (Level of Coverage) on his DD Form 2656 does not show his level of coverage.  He indicated he was married and named N_____ L. S_________ as his beneficiary.  This form shows he married N_____ L. S_________ on 25 April 1997 in Junction City, KS.  

7.  The applicant reached age 60 on 16 February 2008.  He applied for retired pay on an unknown date.

8.  The applicant provided a 31 August 2009 letter from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment addressed to N_____ W____.  The letter shows the following:

* A search of records for 1993 through 1997 was conducted based on the information provided 
* No marriage certificate was located 
* She was advised to contact the Clerk of the District Court in the county where the event took place

9.  In a 9 April 2010 email, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) informed a staff member of the following:

* The applicant had named N____ L. S________ as his spouse and beneficiary in his SBP election
* The retired pay system reflects SBP spouse coverage based on full gross pay for N_____  L. S_________
* Letter received on 11 January 2010 from N_____ W____ stipulated she was never married to the applicant 
* N_____ W____ requested SBP be terminated
* The applicant would have to prove he was never married by providing a letter from the clerk of courts from his home of domicile
10.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

11.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  

* Option A -  elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to 
start SBP participation
* Option B - elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before 
age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday
* Option C - elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon 
their death if before age 60

12.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the 
second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  Reservists who elected an option under the RCSBP will continue to have the Reservist Portion cost deducted from their retired pay.  The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.

13.  The applicant, when he applied for retired pay and listed N.W. as his spouse, lived in Kansas.  Kansas allows common law marriages (Whetstone v. Whetstone, 178 Kan. 595, 290 P. 2d. 1022 (Kan. 1955); K.S.A. 23-101.  Even if he did not have a formal document attesting to his Kansas marriage, he and N.W. were legally married since they held themselves out as husband and wife.  Though they now live in Arizona (which does not allow common law marriage) Arizona honors common law marriages from another state.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions have been carefully considered.  However, the applicant’s service record does not contain sufficient evidence on which to grant relief in this case.  

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant received his 20-Year Letter on 13 January 1993.  He completed the DD Form 1883 and elected dependent child only coverage, Option A.  He was not married at the time.  
3.  The applicant retired on 1 October 1993.  

4.  The applicant completed a DD Form 2656 in July 2007 and elected SBP spouse coverage.  He named N_____ L. S_________ as his spouse.  The retired pay system at DFAS indicates the applicant elected SBP spouse coverage based on full gross pay for N_____ L. S_________.

5.  The 31 August 2009 letter from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment performed a search of records for the period 1993 through 1997 and no marriage certificate was located.  This search was based on information provided by N____ W____.  

6.  The 9 April 2010 email from DFAS indicates that office received a letter from N_____ W____ in January 2010 in which she attested she was not married to the applicant.  However, she did not provide sufficient evidence to support her claim.  

7.  In the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary, there is a reluctance to change the applicant’s records to terminate his enrollment in the SBP for spouse coverage.  However, if the applicant can provide sufficient documents to verify he was not married at the time of his SBP election (either formally or as a common law marriage in Kansas), he can reapply.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION












BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017316



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017316



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018659

    Original file (20080018659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 2000, the applicant and the FSM were divorced. The Separation and Property Settlement Agreement to the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage ordered the FSM to maintain the applicant as the beneficiary of his SBP election; that is, he was ordered to change his SBP coverage from spouse only to former spouse. On 7 June 2004, the applicant filed a request with DFAS for, in effect, a deemed election changing SBP coverage from spouse only to former spouse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013359

    Original file (20090013359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The evidence available to the Board indicates the FSM annotated on his October 1993 DD Form 1883 that he was not married at the time he elected to provide an annuity to his dependent son. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006196C070205

    Original file (20060006196C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, when her husband was notified in 1991 of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, he was single and listed his sister as the person to receive his RCSBP annuity. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448 (Application of Plan), provides, in pertinent part, that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the Plan. However,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007720C070206

    Original file (20050007720C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a divorce decree dated 4 November 1971 with a related certification from the Office of the Prothonotary, Philadelphia, PA dated 18 May 2004; an Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) letter dated 28 July 2004 administratively closing his case with his original application to the ABCMR; his retirement orders; orders transferring him to the Retired Reserve; his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter); three DD Forms 1883...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075048C070403

    Original file (2002075048C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60 th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant and the FSM formally married on 10 February 1995 and the FSM died on 17 May 1995. If the applicant can provide evidence to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101070C070208

    Original file (2004101070C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that they divorced in 1996. The applicant provided evidence to show she and the FSM lived together after their divorce; however, she provided insufficient evidence to show that she and the FSM were party to a common law marriage for SBP annuity purposes. Nevertheless, there is sufficient evidence to show that it was the FSM's intent to continue to provide the SBP for the applicant.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015823

    Original file (20140015823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    h. DFAS letter to the applicant, dated 4 June 2014 (Exhibit L), that notified him of an adjustment in the SBP portion of his retired pay account based on documentation received from him. However, there is no evidence of record that shows the applicant notified DFAS concerning an error in his SBP coverage from the time that he retired from the U.S. Army on 25 March 2009 through May 2014. On 4 June 2014, DFAS notified the applicant of an adjustment in the SBP portion of his retired pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016997

    Original file (20140016997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show she is the eligible beneficiary to receive a Reserve Component (RC) Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity as a former spouse. The applicant contends, in effect, that the FSM's records should be corrected to show his RCSBP election was changed from spouse to former spouse coverage because their divorce judgment required the FSM to maintain SBP with former spouse coverage for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000030

    Original file (20120000030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He elected participation in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage based on the full amount under Option C (Immediate coverage). On 15 August 2011, by letter, a DFAS official notified the applicant's Member of Congress that: * Entitlement to retired pay terminates on the date of the retiree's death * The Arrears of Pay (AOP) include unencumbered amounts due to the deceased member * An amount of $752.40 was mailed to the applicant on 1 September 2010 for his AOP from 1 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001957

    Original file (20140001957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her marriage to a deceased former service member (FSM) be recognized as being in excess of the 1 year of marriage required to receive a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity. Public Law 94-496, enacted 14 October 1976, reduced this waiting period to 1 year following post-retirement marriage. The evidence shows that on 15 September 1998, the FSM submitted a DD Form 1883 and indicated at that time he was married to a spouse other than the applicant.