Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015544
Original file (20080015544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080015544 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) be added to his record and separation document (DD Form 214). 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he served with the 76th and 176th Army Security Agency (ASA) Companies in Taiwan in the late 1950s through 1962 and believes he is authorized the AFEM based on this service.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that he initially enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 4 September 1958, and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 051.10 (Intelligence Specialist).

3.  The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows in item 29 (Foreign Service) that he served in Taiwan from 18 August 1959 through 18 February 1962 and in Korea from 27 October 1963 through 14 November 1964.

4.  The applicant's Service Record (DA Form 24) shows in Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, or Reductions) that the applicant was promoted to specialist five on 12 June 1961 and was laterally appointed to sergeant on 28 June 1962, and that this is the highest grade he held while serving on active duty.  Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) shows that while serving in Taiwan, he was assigned to the 176th ASA Company from 25 August 1959 through 31 May 1961 and to the 76th ASA Company from 1 June 1961 through 20 February 1962.

5.  On 19 February 1962, the applicant was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  The Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) he was issued at the time shows he earned the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine (M-2) Bar and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar during the period of service covered by the separation document (4 September 1958-19 February 1962).

6.  On 20 February 1962, the applicant reenlisted for 3 years and continued to serve on active duty until 19 February 1965, at which time he was honorably discharged by reason of expiration of term of service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at this time shows he earned the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar and AGCM (2nd Award) during the period covered by the separation document (20 February 1962-19 February 1965).

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 2-12 contains guidance on the AFEM and states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded to members of the Armed Forces who, after 1 July 1958, participated in designated operations.  Table 2-2 identifies all the operations for which the AFEM is authorized and shows that it is authorized for service in the Taiwan Straits during the period 23 August 1958 to 1 January 1959 and for service in Korea from 1October 1966 to 30 June 1974.    


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he is authorized to receive the AFEM based on his service in Taiwan was carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2.  By regulation, the AFEM was authorized for service in the Taiwan Straits during the period 23 August 1958 through 1 January 1959 and the applicant's tour in Taiwan did not begin until 18 August 1959, which was subsequent to this AFEM qualifying period.  In addition, the regulation identifies no AFEM qualifying periods for service in Taiwan or Korea during the periods the applicant served in these overseas areas.  As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015544



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015544


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009778

    Original file (20080009778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his active duty service in Taiwan from May 1958 through April 1960. Army Regulation 600-8-2 lists the designated U.S. military operations, areas, and dates for eligibility for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050017041C070206

    Original file (AR20050017041C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The AFEM was authorized for the period beginning 23 August 1958 and required that individuals serve in the area of operations for 30 consecutive days in order to be eligible for the award. The applicant did not depart Taiwan until 10 October 1958, which is more than sufficient time to qualify for that award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006758

    Original file (20080006758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his deployment to the Taiwan Straits (Army and Air Post Offices (APO) 63) during the period 5 September 1958 to 1 October 1958 and in effect, award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correction of item 24c on his DD Form 214 to show additional foreign service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006140

    Original file (20080006140.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in Taiwan for more than 30 consecutive days during a qualifying period for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and correction of his military records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089059C070403

    Original file (2003089059C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. Reconstructed records show that the applicant served a period of qualifying service in Taiwan for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. __jl___ ___rw__ __ao___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006655

    Original file (20110006655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 does not list the AFEM and CIB. However, there is no evidence of record and he has provided insufficient evidence to show he served in Taiwan. Even if he served in Taiwan, the DA Form 2-1 was prepared and maintained for active Army personnel during their active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005265

    Original file (20120005265.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110015199 on 7 February 2012. He recounted his participation in the "Battle of the Taiwan Strait" and said they put on a night fire demonstration for the Communists on 15 August 1958.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015199

    Original file (20110015199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was deployed to the Republic of China (ROC) in Taiwan with the 2nd Missile Battalion, 71st Artillery from 8 October 1958 to 25 August 1959. The documents provided by the applicant contain his name and show he was located at APO 63, which at the time of his service covered the area of Taiwan.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002941

    Original file (20110002941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of his official records show he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service and his records are void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016228

    Original file (20100016228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the: * National Defense Service Medal * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Bazooka, Rifle (M-14), Pistol, Automatic Rifle, Sub-Machinegun, Bayonet, Carbine, Anti-Aircraft Artillery, and Grenade Bars 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for the following...