Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006140
Original file (20080006140.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  22 JULY 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006140 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. 

2.  The applicant essentially states that he never received the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal that he is entitled to.  He also states, in effect, that other members of his unit in Taiwan, the 176th United States Army Security Agency (USASA) Company, received the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.  He further states that he was assigned to this unit from 1957 to 1959.  He continued by stating that he tried to join the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), but must show that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal in order to do so.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 June 1956.  After completing initial entry training, he departed the continental United States on 9 April 1957 for a tour in Taiwan, where he served with the 176th USASA Company.  He returned to the continental United States on or about 22 March 1959, and was stationed at Camp Wolters, Texas until he was honorably released from active duty on 20 June 1960.  The DD Form 214 that he was issued does not show that he was awarded any awards, decorations, or badges.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.  However, he served a tour in Taiwan from 9 April 1957 to on or about 22 March 1959.

4.  During a review of the applicant’s records, it was determined that he is entitled to a badge that is not shown on his DD Form 214.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar.  However, Section 9 (Medals, Decorations, and Citations) of the applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows that he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar by Headquarters, 316th USASA Battalion Special Orders Number 32, dated 8 March 1960.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period.  An individual, who was not engaged in actual combat or equally hazardous activity, must have been a bona fide member of a unit participating in, or be engaged in the direct support of, the operation for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days provided this support involved entering the area of operations.  This regulation also essentially shows that service in the Taiwan Straits during the period 
23 August 1958 to 1 January 1959 was a qualifying period for a United States military operation for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he should be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

2.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in Taiwan for more than 30 consecutive days during a qualifying period for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and correction of his military records to show this award.

3.  Special orders awarded the applicant the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar, but it is not listed on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show the award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar.

BOARD VOTE:

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and by showing the award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar.

2.  The Board wants to thank the applicant for the sacrifices he made in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his honorable service in arms. 




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006140



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006140



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009778

    Original file (20080009778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his active duty service in Taiwan from May 1958 through April 1960. Army Regulation 600-8-2 lists the designated U.S. military operations, areas, and dates for eligibility for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015544

    Original file (20080015544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows in item 29 (Foreign Service) that he served in Taiwan from 18 August 1959 through 18 February 1962 and in Korea from 27 October 1963 through 14 November 1964. On 20 February 1962, the applicant reenlisted for 3 years and continued to serve on active duty until 19 February 1965, at which time he was honorably discharged by reason of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016228

    Original file (20100016228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the: * National Defense Service Medal * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Bazooka, Rifle (M-14), Pistol, Automatic Rifle, Sub-Machinegun, Bayonet, Carbine, Anti-Aircraft Artillery, and Grenade Bars 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for the following...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006758

    Original file (20080006758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his deployment to the Taiwan Straits (Army and Air Post Offices (APO) 63) during the period 5 September 1958 to 1 October 1958 and in effect, award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correction of item 24c on his DD Form 214 to show additional foreign service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050017041C070206

    Original file (AR20050017041C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The AFEM was authorized for the period beginning 23 August 1958 and required that individuals serve in the area of operations for 30 consecutive days in order to be eligible for the award. The applicant did not depart Taiwan until 10 October 1958, which is more than sufficient time to qualify for that award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002824

    Original file (20070002824.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of the Vietnam Service Medal for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Records show that the applicant served in four campaigns in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to Item 24 of his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 October 1970, the Army Commendation Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal (5th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013253

    Original file (20090013253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he qualified with the Carbine Rifle three times, four awards of the Overseas Service Bar, and any award to which he is entitled for service during the Cold War. Therefore, he is not eligible for correction of his records to show any awards of the Overseas Service Bar. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 26 of his DD Form 214 the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000703

    Original file (20130000703.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of: * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), for the period ending 20 October 1959 to show the Airborne Course * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 February 1965, to show in: * item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Overseas Service Ribbon * United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089059C070403

    Original file (2003089059C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. Reconstructed records show that the applicant served a period of qualifying service in Taiwan for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. __jl___ ___rw__ __ao___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001207

    Original file (20120001207.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 July 1979 to show all medals for his service in Korea and Okinawa. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 July 1979 the: * Korea Defense Service Medal *...