Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015029
Original file (20080015029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  18 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080015029 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage.

2.  The applicant states that neither she nor her husband realized there was a time limit in making an SBP election.  Therefore, they were not properly informed about the SBP.

3.  The applicant provides details of her husband's illnesses, the pain he experienced as a result of his illnesses, and how she was there for him throughout his ordeal.  The applicant adds that she is also disabled due to a spinal injury, but cannot collect her husband's social security widow's pension until she is 50 years old and she is only 48 years old.

4.  The applicant provides her certificate of marriage and her husband's death certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM's records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 June 1972 and was honorably released from active duty on 28 June 1974 and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) the following day.

2.  On 1 March 1978, the FSM was permanently retired for physical unfitness.

3.  The FSM married the applicant on 18 June 2004 and he died on 23 April 2008.

4.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name.  Changes in SBP options are not authorized except in specific instances, or authorized by law.

5.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.  

6.  Army Echoes is an Army Bulletin for the Army Retiree published three times a year and mailed to Army retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army.  These Bulletins consistently contain a reminder to retirees that they are responsible for updating their accounts within one year of marriage, remarriage, divorce or upon the death of a spouse and that they may need to make or update a SBP election.  Periodically, these Bulletins contain articles explaining the SBP and the importance of keeping accounts up to date.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence that the FSM elected SBP within 1 year of his marriage to the applicant.

2.  The applicant contends that she was not properly counseled concerning SBP. In this regard, while the Army will provide counseling on SBP to individuals upon request, the Army is under no obligation to seek out spouses of military retirees who marry after their retirement to inform them of their spouse's SBP options.

3.  In addition, the FSM was reminded at least three times a year to keep his SBP current in his Army Echoes Bulletin.  If he was unsure on what his options were, the Army Echoes provided contact information on counselors who would have provided that information and would have assisted him.  

4.  Regrettably, in view of the foregoing there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015029



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015029



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015438

    Original file (20080015438.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A letter from DFAS, dated 11 March 2008, informed the FSM that his request for spouse coverage under SBP for his newly married spouse could not be implemented because he had not elected coverage within 1 year of their marriage date. The FSM's Retiree Account Statement, with an effective date of 7 April 2008, does not show any SBP premiums being deducted from the FSM's retired pay. They would have received at least one Retiree Account Statement within one year of their marriage and the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007875

    Original file (20070007875.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. The applicant provides a copy of a DD Form 1883, DD Form 2656-6, NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) with Separation Orders 311-833 dated 7 November 2001, a letter from U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC) dated 21 December 2006, a letter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010010

    Original file (20100010010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM was born on 23 February 1968 and he enlisted in the Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG) on 11 August 1986. Therefore, even if he had been married to the applicant for a year, she would still not be eligible to receive an SBP annuity because the FSM named his children as the beneficiaries of his SBP annuity and never added the applicant. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005450

    Original file (20090005450.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within a year of his marriage to the applicant. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child, may elect to participate in the SBP. Since the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012872

    Original file (20130012872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM married the applicant on 26 October 2000. The applicant provided a letter from DFAS to a Member of Congress, dated 5 June 2013, which stated: * the FSM retired on 1 September 1997 * he was not married at the time, but he had minor children and he elected children only SBP coverage * he married the applicant on 26 October 2000, but he did not notify DFAS within 1 year of that marriage that he wished to elect spouse SBP coverage * his lack of an SBP election constitutes a declination...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011300

    Original file (20080011300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM and the applicant married on 8 May 1999. The FSM married the applicant in May 1999. However, the Army Echoes issued at the time he married the applicant reminded retirees that if they remarried and needed to make an SBP election they were responsible for contacting DFAS, clearly indicating that an SBP election could be made upon remarriage and clearly implying that the new wife could be covered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004639

    Original file (20130004639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's record to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage. He married the applicant on 6 September 1985.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005059

    Original file (20120005059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She provides the following: * DD Form 2656-7 (Verification for Survivor Annuity) * Orders 6-1 and 195-17, dated 11 March 1985 and 6 October 1994, respectively * U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) letter, dated 2 February 2012 * DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), dated 7 September 1991 * Marriage License * Direct Deposit Sign-Up Form * Form W-4P (Withholding Certificate for Pension or Annuity Payments) * Memorandum, Subject: Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001369

    Original file (20090001369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her previous request that the records of her husband, the former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "Natural person with insurable interest-mother" to "Spouse only" coverage upon marriage. The applicant appealed to the ABCMR in an application dated 1 August 2007 requesting that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he elected to change his SBP coverage from "Natural...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013359

    Original file (20090013359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The evidence available to the Board indicates the FSM annotated on his October 1993 DD Form 1883 that he was not married at the time he elected to provide an annuity to his dependent son. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that the FSM...