Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014840
Original file (20080014840.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       22 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014840 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that his highest rank held satisfactorily was staff sergeant, pay grade E-6, and that his retired pay be adjusted accordingly.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he is currently receiving retired pay as a sergeant, pay grade E-5.  He held the rank of staff sergeant, pay grade E-6 and wants his retired pay adjusted to reflect this status.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of two NGB Forms 22 (Reports of Separation and Record of Service) dated 6 August 1968 and 1 October 1994.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 7 August 1960, the applicant enlisted in the Michigan Army National Guard.  He served as a supply sergeant with the 46th Engineer Group in Flint Michigan.  

3.  On 7 April 1966, the applicant was promoted to staff sergeant, pay grade E-6.

4.  On 6 August 1968, the applicant was discharged in the rank of staff sergeant, pay grade E-6, with an honorable characterization of service at his ETS (expiration term of service).  He had completed 8 years of creditable service in an active Reserve status.

5.  The applicant's Statement of Service for the period from 7 August 1960 to 
6 August 1968 shows that he had attained a total of 749 points creditable towards retirement and that every year of this period was identified as a satisfactory year of Federal service.

6.  On 28 September 1982, the applicant enlisted in the Michigan Army National Guard.  The applicant's Enlistment/Reenlistment Document (DD Form 4) shows that he enlisted in pay grade E-5.

7.  Orders 46-1, Michigan Army National Guard, dated 22 July 1988, reduced the applicant from sergeant, pay grade E-5 to specialist four, pay grade E-4.  This action was voluntary and without prejudice.

8.  Orders 20-1, Michigan Army National Guard, dated 21 April 1989, promoted the applicant to the rank of sergeant, pay grade E-5.

9.  On 1 October 1994, the applicant was discharged from the Michigan Army National Guard, with an honorable characterization of service, and transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Retired Reserve) in the rank of sergeant, pay grade E-5.  He had completed a total of 20 years and 8 days of creditable service.

10.  Records show that the applicant was born on 5 December 1942.  The applicant attained 60 years of age on 5 December 2002 and eligibility for retired pay.

11.  Title 10 of the United States Code, section 12731 provides the legal authority for age and service (non-regular) retirements.  Section 1406 provides the legal authority for establishing the retired pay base for members who first became members before September 8, 1980.  Paragraph (b)(2) contains guidance on non-regular service retirement.  It states, in pertinent part, that in the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the Armed Forces.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show his highest pay grade held as E-6.  He further contends that he is receiving retired pay as an E-5 and that it should be adjusted to reflect his highest pay grade 
of E-6.

2.  The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant was promoted to staff sergeant, pay grade E-6 on 7 April 1966, and that he satisfactorily served in that rank until his honorable discharge at his ETS on 6 August 1968.

3.  By law, in connection with a non-regular retirement, enlisted members are entitled to receive retired pay in the highest grade held satisfactorily at any time in the Armed Forces.  The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant’s service in the highest grade he held (staff sergeant, pay grade E-6) was satisfactory.  

4.  In view of the facts of this case, the applicant’s record should be corrected to show he was authorized to receive non-regular retired pay based on pay grade E-6 on 5 December 2002, the date he turned age 60 and became eligible to receive retired pay.  Further, it would be appropriate to provide him all back retired pay due as a result.  

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he is authorized to receive non-regular retired pay based on pay grade E-6, effective 5 December 2002.  Furthermore, it would be appropriate to provide him all back pay due as a result of this correction. 






      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014840



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014840



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000296

    Original file (20120000296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation (DODFMR), volume 7B (Military Pay Policy and Procedures-Retired Pay), chapter 1 (Initial Entitlements-Retirements), section 0105 (Rank and Pay Grade), paragraph 010501A (General Determinations) states that unless entitled to a higher grade under some other provision of law, those Regular and Reserve members who retire other than for disability, will retire in the Regular or Reserve grade they hold on the date of retirement. By law, a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009457

    Original file (20090009457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When he was reduced, he was not provided an opportunity to have his case heard by a reduction board. The applicant’s records further show he enlisted in the AZARNG for a period of 3 years in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 on 11 June 1981. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in the AZARNG in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 on 11 June 1981.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006856

    Original file (20080006856.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his retired pay grade as E-6. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant held the rank of staff sergeant, pay grade E-6 for a period of 8 months and 18 days from 7 July 1978 to his honorable discharge on 25 March 1979. In view of the above, the applicant’s records should be corrected to show his retired pay grade as E-6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021210

    Original file (20140021210.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he was placed on the retired list in the rank/pay grade of SSG/E-6, the highest grade he satisfactorily held, instead of SGT/E-5, because he was not reduced for adverse reasons. The available evidence in this case confirms the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6, on 7 January 1998, and he satisfactorily served in that rank until he was administratively reduced to SGT/E-5 on 21 December 2004. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019837

    Original file (20130019837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show his retired rank and grade as staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. His DD Form 214 shows he held the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 on the date of his separation and that he had been promoted to that grade on 30 July 1984. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve - Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Non-regular Service) implements statutory authorities governing granting retired pay to Soldiers and former Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001126

    Original file (20130001126.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that in the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the Armed Forces. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Non-regular Service) states that a person granted retired pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011310

    Original file (20080011310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that in the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the Armed Forces. In view of the facts of this case, the applicant’s retirement orders should be corrected to show he was placed on the retired list in the retired grade of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001266C071029

    Original file (20070001266C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains a request for voluntary reduction made by the applicant on 25 September 1980. The orders further indicated that the authority for reduction was paragraph 6-35, National Guard Regulation 600-200, and that the reason for reduction was the individual request of the applicant. The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 4 June 1974, and that he satisfactorily served in that rank until...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022239

    Original file (20110022239.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was retired in the rank/pay grade of major (MAJ)/O-4, the highest grade he satisfactorily held. It states, in pertinent part, that in the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017218

    Original file (20070017218.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, Orders C-06-02539, dated 20 June 1986 (Relief from the USAR Control Group-Reinforcement). He is currently a retired USAR SGT/E-5. In light of the applicant’s over four years of satisfactory service as a SSG/E-6, and in light of the fact that he was not reduced for misconduct or inefficiency, he should have been placed on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade at the time of his retirement.