Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014829
Original file (20080014829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        23 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014829 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage be terminated effective 30 June 2006 and that all money collected be refunded to his bank account. 

2.  The applicant states that he and his family already have insurance to cover all means of surviving any unforeseen emergency.  He adds that he submitted a DD Form 2656-2 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request) to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and that he was advised by a DFAS representative of the procedure and steps to follow in applying for this correction. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of DD Form 2656-2, dated 5 July 2006; a copy of Orders C-05-690857, dated 4 May 2006, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC)-St. Louis; and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 30 June 2006 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s records show he was born on 24 November 1951 and enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 16 May 1976.  He subsequently entered active duty for training, completed basic combat and advanced individual training, and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).  His records also show he was ordered to active duty in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status on 26 September 1983.  

2.  The applicant’s records also show he executed several reenlistments in the USAR and attained the rank of sergeant first class (SFC).

3.  On 10 December 1997, the U.S Army Reserve Personnel Command issued the applicant a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter).  This letter notified the applicant that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60.  

4.  On 4 May 2006, HRC-St. Louis published Orders C-05-690857 ordering the applicant’s release from active duty effective 30 June 2006 and placing him on the Retired List in his retired rank of SFC effective 1 July 2007.

5.  On 8 June 2006, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel).  On this form, he indicated that he was married, but had no dependent children.  He elected to participate in the SBP, spouse coverage, based on the full gross pay.  He authenticated this form by placing his signature and date in the appropriate blocks.  Furthermore, a Retirement Services Officer witnessed the signature and placed her own signature and date in the appropriate blocks.

6.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 30 June 2006, transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired), and placed on the Retired List on 1 July 2006.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was credited with over 24 years of active duty.

7.  The applicant submitted a DD Form 2656-2, dated 5 July 2006, that shows he desired to discontinue participation in the SBP.  He authenticated this form by placing his signature and date in the appropriate blocks.  His spouse concurred with his decision.  She and a witness authenticated this form by placing their signatures and dates in the appropriate blocks.  

8.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.  This Law also provides that every member having a spouse and/or child(ren), who retired/transfers to the retired list on or after that date, is automatically covered under SBP at the maximum rate unless he/she elected otherwise before retirement or transfer to the retired list.



9.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement, the applicant elected to participate in the SBP, spouse coverage.  It appears that he was counseled and authenticated this form in the presence of a retirement services officer.  The applicant was a senior noncommissioned officer at the time he made his election.  He knew or should have known the implications of his decision.  

2.  With respect to termination of SBP enrollment, the applicant is advised that retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required, if the Soldier is married.  The applicant could have made a written request to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) as early as 1 July 2008 (the beginning of the second anniversary of the date on which his retired pay started) to request disenrollment; however; there is no indication that he did so.  

3.  Furthermore, by law, in order to terminate SBP enrollment, spousal concurrence is required.  The DD Form 2656-2, dated 5 July 2006, that contains his spouse's concurrence was invalid when submitted in July 2006 since it was not submitted within the time frame allowed by law.  Therefore, it cannot be accepted today to show that the spouse concurred with the decision.  When submitting his request to DFAS to terminate his SBP, the applicant must obtain a new concurrence from his spouse. 

4.  With respect to a refund of premiums paid, as stated earlier, retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required. No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  If the applicant elects to terminate his SBP participation at that time, he is advised that despite his action, he is not entitled to a refund because the monthly deductions are the cost of the SBP coverage or protection the applicant's spouse enjoyed from the date the applicant made an election.



5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.   Therefore, he is not entitled to relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


															XXX
      ______________________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014829



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014829



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029388

    Original file (20100029388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The spouse's signature MUST be notarized] of the DD Form 2656 is neither signed by his spouse to indicate her concurrence or non-concurrence with his election nor by a witness and/or retirement services officer. The evidence of record shows he retired on 13 July 2009 by reason of temporary disability. By law, his spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date he made this election but prior to the date of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012267

    Original file (20110012267.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement on 31 December 2010, the applicant and his wife elected to decline participation in the SBP with a duly witnessed and notarized DD Form 2656, dated 21 December 2010. In the interest of equity and justice, his records should be corrected to show he elected not to participate in the SBP with his spouse's concurrence prior to the date of his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018920

    Original file (20100018920.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of the DD Form 2656 instructs the applicant that "SBP spouse concurrence is required when a member is married and elects child(ren) only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage. The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement on 31 May 2010, the applicant and his wife elected to decline participation in the SBP with a notarized DD Form 2656, dated 30 March 2010. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021300

    Original file (20110021300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. Public Law 106-398, dated 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of the 20-year letter, a qualified Reserve Component member who is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012944

    Original file (20080012944.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no record that the applicant attempted to terminate his participation in the SBP and there is no indication at DFAS that the applicant submitted any requests to terminate the SBP. An email, dated 1 October 2008, from the Retired Pay Office, Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) confirms that the applicant's $87.66 monthly SBP premium was in error and based on "spouse" coverage. The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement, the applicant elected to participate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018353

    Original file (20140018353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section XI (Certification) item 30 (Member) states, "Also, I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within 1-year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. He provided a DD Form 2656-2 requesting termination of his SBP coverage. The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 wherein he elected to participate in the SBP for spouse/children based on the full amount in the presence of an RSO counselor.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011716

    Original file (20080011716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with his spouse's concurrence. By doing so, he also acknowledged he had been counseled that he can terminate SBP participation, with his spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. Completion of Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of DD Form 2656 is required when a service member is married and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011734

    Original file (20100011734.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, she requests correction of her records to show, at the time she retired, she elected not to participate in the SBP. Although she and her spouse failed to make the election before her retirement, it appears the RSO counselor also failed to inform her or her spouse that the SBP election was required to be signed and dated before the effective date of her retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000166

    Original file (20140000166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her November 2013 Retiree Account Statement shows she currently has SBP coverage for spouse and children and she had made 16 payments toward her 360 months of paid-up SBP coverage. Because she retired by reason of sufficient active duty service for retirement, she made an SBP election in connection with this retirement wherein she elected not to participate in the SBP. The applicant retired on 31 July 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007522

    Original file (20100007522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends the DD Form 2656 that he completed on 27 October 2009 where he declined SBP spouse coverage should be honored and the SBP premiums refunded because both he and his spouse were present when he signed the document in the presence of an Army SBP counselor and notary public, respectively. The evidence of record confirms that on 27 October 2009, in his application for retired pay, the applicant declined to participate in SBP. The evidence shows that, for some period of...