Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014473
Original file (20080014473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       16 DECEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014473 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 16 May 1972, be corrected to show that he entered active duty on 15 September 1967.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that he entered active duty on 22 May 1968, when in fact he entered active duty on 15 September 1967.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and pictures from his basic training graduation cycle book.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in Buffalo, New York on 21 September 1967 for a period of 3 years under the Airborne Unassigned enlistment option.  He completed his basic and advanced individual training at Fort Dix, New Jersey and was transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia, where he completed airborne training before being transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina for duty as an infantryman. 

3.  After serving 8 months and 1 day of active service, he was honorably discharged on 21 May 1968 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He was issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate and a DD Form 214.

4.  On 22 May 1968, he reenlisted for a period of 4 years and training as a welder.  He attended welder training at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland from July to December 1968 and was then returned to Fort Bragg.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 21 June 1969.  

5.  He was reassigned to Fort Campbell, Kentucky on 23 April 1970 and on 20 June 1970, he was transferred to Germany with his unit.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 11 February 1971.

6.  He departed Germany on 11 May 1972 and was transferred to Fort Dix, where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 16 May 1972 as an overseas returnee.  He had served 3 years, 11 months, and 25 days of active service during his current enlistment and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects his 8 months and 1 day of prior active service.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation and issuance of the DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect at the time provided in pertinent part, that individuals would be issued a DD Form 214 when discharged for immediate reenlistment.  Information contained on a previous DD Form 214 would not be entered on succeeding DD Forms 214 except for cumulative and prior service.  On 1 October 1979, that regulation changed and a DD Form 214 was not authorized to be issued for immediate reenlistments or separations/
breaks in service of less than 1 full day.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2.  The applicant reenlisted on 22 May 1968 for a period of 4 years and his DD Form 214 correctly reflects that he entered on the period of service covered by the DD Form 214 on that date.

3.  Additionally, his DD Form 214 correctly reflects that he had served 4 years, 7 months and 26 days of total active service which when subtracted from his date of discharge, equates to his initial entry date of 21 September 1967.

4.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 is correctly prepared in accordance with the applicable regulation and the applicant has failed to show otherwise.  Therefore, there appears to be no basis to change the dates on his DD Form 214 dated 13 February 1973.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  __X______  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________XXX______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014473



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014473



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006750

    Original file (20120006750.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending on 18 February 1972 shows: a. he had reenlisted on 20 February 1969 for 3 years; b. he had attained the rank of specialist five, E5; c. his specialty number and title at the time of REFRAD was 44C2O (Welder); d. he did not have any insurance in force. The applicant contends that his DD Forms 214 do not complement each other and they fail to show his correct: * dates of service * MOSs * period of service in the FRG * promotion status *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015659

    Original file (20080015659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 13 February 1973 be corrected to reflect that he entered the service on 12 January 1960. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 19 January 1962 and on 11 January 1963, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment and was issued a DD Form 214 on that date. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004727

    Original file (20110004727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his pay grade as E-5 and his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) as 44C2O (Welder). His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows his pay grade as E-4 and his PMOS as 13A1O. In the absence of evidence to show he was promoted to pay grade E-5 and that PMOS 44C2O was awarded prior to his REFRAD on 14 February 1972, there appears to be no basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010422

    Original file (20080010422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam was from 14 July 1969 to 14 July 1970. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 11 July 1969 to 3 July 1970. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011359

    Original file (20090011359.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    With respect to the applicant's MOS, the evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded PMOS 63B5H, indicating completion of instructor training. With respect to the applicant's date of entry, the regulation in effect at the time required item 12a to show the date of the first day of the last immediate reenlistment for which a DD Form 214 was not issued and that a DD Form 214 would not be prepared for member discharged for immediate reenlistment. The evidence of record shows that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089835C070403

    Original file (2003089835C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his service in Korea, Vietnam and with a military police battalion at Fort Dix, New Jersey, be entered on his separation document. His foreign and/or sea service (item 22c) is reflected as 3 years, five months, and 3 days when in actuality the applicant only had a total of 1 year, 9 months, and 1 day of overseas service between his tour of duty in Korea and his tour of duty in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010034

    Original file (20080010034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 dated 26 March 1971 incorrectly reflects that he entered active duty on 30 June 1968, when in fact he entered active duty on 27 September 1967. He was issued a DD Form 214 covering his service from 27 September 1967 to 29 June 1968. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013173

    Original file (20060013173.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add the Purple Heart. This document show the unit to which the applicant was assigned was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 1 August 1967 to 31 October 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders 53, dated 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012804

    Original file (20110012804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his correct social security number (SSN). Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his correct SSN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008514C070205

    Original file (20060008514C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he earned the MOS of 95B and that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that he was a military policeman. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which occurred on 28 September 1973, the date of his discharge. Item 38 (Record of Assignment), of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), shows he served as a military policeman, in MOS 95B4O, from 11 August 1971 to 9 July 1973.